Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-06-06 Thread xclaesse
Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 15:44 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit : > On 6 June 2018 at 15:38, wrote: > > Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 15:33 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit : > > > On 18 May 2018 at 10:52, Philip Withnall > > > wrote: > > > > tl;dr: Want to provide us with a GitLab CI runner for a non- > >

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-06-06 Thread xclaesse
Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 15:33 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit : > On 18 May 2018 at 10:52, Philip Withnall > wrote: > > tl;dr: Want to provide us with a GitLab CI runner for a non-Linux > > > > platform? > > > > > > > > There’s been a surge of interest recently, from various directions, > > in

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-06-06 Thread xclaesse
Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 15:21 +0100, Philip Withnall a écrit : > What are those 5 commands? I think it should be possible to use a > separate Docker image for the FreeBSD CI, but run it on the same > Docker > hosts as the Fedora image which we use for the Linux CI and > crossbuilds. > > See

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-28 Thread xclaesse
Hi, We now have 6 arch tested for glib, all with Meson. - fedora-meson-x86_64: * Native Linux * Builds with --werror * All unit tests pass - fedora-meson-android_ndk_r16_api21_arm64 * Cross build for Android * Fails to build with --werror, if anyone wants to take a look. * Cannot

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-25 Thread xclaesse
Le mercredi 23 mai 2018 à 22:02 +0200, Christoph Reiter a écrit : > > One big item missing in this list is MSVC. Since we already have a > > Windows VM that does MSYS2 CI, is it possible to setup msvc on that > > one > > too, or does it require a VisualStudio licence, or something? > > For the

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-23 Thread xclaesse
Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 10:52 +0100, Philip Withnall a écrit : > Hi all, > > Can anybody else provide and maintain CI runners for other platforms? > I’d particularly like to see: > • *BSD (probably OpenBSD and NetBSD) > • macOS (ideally several versions, since we support from OS X 10.7 >

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-20 Thread xclaesse
Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 22:15 -0400, xclae...@gmail.com a écrit : > • More Windows configurations (currently we have MSYS2 on Windows > > Server 2012; ideally we’d have a MinGW-w64 runner too) > > Could also cross build in docker with mingw. This one was actually easy to setup, our CI docker

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-19 Thread xclaesse
Ok, spent way too much time on this, but finally got it working to cross build glib on our fedora docker image. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796264 Similar setup could be done to cross build for windows using mingw. Tests could maybe run with exe_wrapper=wine, that would be fun :P

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-19 Thread xclaesse
Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 23:38 -0400, philip.chime...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:15 PM wrote: > > Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 10:52 +0100, Philip Withnall a écrit : > > > • macOS (ideally several versions, since we support from OS X > > 10.7 > > >

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-18 Thread xclaesse
Thanks for this call for help, it's our chance to finally be serious about supporting multiple platforms, instead of always fixing a posteriori. Thanks to gitlab that shouldn't be too hard to setup. Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 10:52 +0100, Philip Withnall a écrit : > • macOS (ideally several

Re: [GitLab] Easter gift, GitLab Pages are now enabled

2018-03-29 Thread xclaesse
Hi, Does this means we are going to put project's website inside project's git repo? So your nautilus-web example is ultimately going to be merged into nautilus' git repo? Or I didn't understood? That would be awesome! Regards, Xavier Claessens. Le jeudi 29 mars 2018 à 19:54 +0200, Carlos