Hi,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:10 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
In applications with a large toolbar at the top, the glossy-gradient
effect is a huge throwback to the days of Crux. It's a large departure
from the old Clearlooks that used a flat surface for the toolbar. The
top of every window
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:10 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
It appears to me that the two major issues are:
In applications with a large toolbar at the top, the glossy-gradient
effect is a huge throwback to the days of Crux. It's a large departure
from the old Clearlooks that used a flat
Il giorno lun, 01/08/2005 alle 01.38 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Let me get this part off my chest first:
3) The libgnome maintainers need to change the default GTK+
and icon themes in their GConf schemas.
4) The Metacity maintainers need to change the default
theme in their schemas
a cursor theme. Did we want that changed, is that a
battle for 2.14, or does that just not matter?
4) The Metacity maintainers need to change the default
theme in their schemas.
Done (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312249). Same thing
about the kicking.
Cheers,
Elijah
On 8/1/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I need now:
1) The Clearlooks Metacity theme needs to be landed into CVS
in gnome-themes. Any number of people have provided patches
for this, including me.
2) A
Il giorno gio, 14/07/2005 alle 17.17 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Really. The default theme. Let's make this happen.
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/Clearlooks.tar
Take that tarball. Extract it in a fresh gnome-themes checkout.
It'll add the Clearlooks Metacity theme
Heya,
I'm obviously very excited about this, but some comments:
Please let's clean up the theme list a little bit. Right now it is
proper chaos. The theme called Default which has the comment Gnome
Default Theme is not even the default theme since quite a while. If
we'd now add Clearlooks
quote who=Daniel Borgmann
One alternative would be that you just call it Clearlooks and we change
the Clearlooks default to be what you have in mind (at least for the
metatheme, which is GNOME specific anyway). Another one would be to call
it Default or maybe GNOME Default. In any case I
Let's just remove everything else, and put Clearlooks in, and move the
a11y themes to their own tarball. :)
-- dobey
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:41 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
The tarball also contains Clearlooks.diff. Apply this patch
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
The tarball also contains Clearlooks.diff. Apply this patch to
get all the build files right. Build, install, witness the glory.
I don't mind adding it to gnome-themes, but I think I'd be wanting to
take something else out to make room
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:50 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
None of the other Great Monarchs have assumed power on this issue.
Thus I, as the GDP Fearless Leader, hereby declare this the new
default theme. I don't want a long discussion about people's
favorite colors. I want to start taking
On 7/15/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:50 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
None of the other Great Monarchs have assumed power on this issue.
Thus I, as the GDP Fearless Leader, hereby declare this the new
default theme. I don't want a long discussion about
Really. The default theme. Let's make this happen.
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/Clearlooks.tar
Take that tarball. Extract it in a fresh gnome-themes checkout.
It'll add the Clearlooks Metacity theme, the ClearlooksBlue GTK
theme, and the ClearlooksBlue desktop theme. Compare Clearlooks
Be merry, or else! ;-)
Hurray!
Let us rejoice in the glow of the freshly re-painted bike shed.
Thanks Shaun.
- Callum
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:11:18 -0600, James M. Cape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hacked ClearlooksHuman on my machines both at home and work to turn
off the inset menubar, it really is pretty weird. :-) Without the inset
menubar it looks really slick, IMO.
I won't believe it until I see it ;)
In
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 17:28 +0100, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:52:54 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing the insetting makes the theme look so flat and old and boring that
it ain't even funny:
http://www.osnews.com/img/9810/cl.png
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 21:24 +0100, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:11:18 -0600, James M. Cape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hacked ClearlooksHuman on my machines both at home and work to turn
off the inset menubar, it really is pretty weird. :-) Without the inset
menubar it
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:03 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
I think you should just revert the change. If you're looking for r-t
approval, I think I saw Jeff (on irc) say he thought it should be
reverted now and I'm saying it now too ... so there's your two
approvals :-)
According to me,
On 2 Mar 2005, at 11:06, Davyd Madeley wrote:
According to me, this hasn't been reverted yet. Not to pressure anyone,
or anything. More of a reminder.
Will get to it in the next half hour... some of us only work regular
hours y'know :)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun
On 2 Mar 2005, at 12:20, Calum Benson wrote:
Will get to it in the next half hour... some of us only work regular
hours y'know :)
Now done, btw.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group
http://ie.sun.com
Doing screenshots for the release notes, I don't know if any of you have
noticed, what the default theme looks like.
http://oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au/~davyd/misc/gtk-theme-nuts.png
This seems completely b0rked to me.
The offending patch would seem to be this one:
http://cvs.gnome.org
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:42, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Can someone *PLEASE* explain what's going on here? We've already had one
call to revert the patch (plus one call from someone who doesn't count).
It was a patch from Eugenia that I applied six months ago, that I said
I'd revert if people
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 16:41, Davyd Madeley wrote:
What's the call?
Well, I said I'd revert it if it caused anyone a problem and I'm still
happy to do so, but at this late stage I guess it's a release team
decision.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems
Hey Calum,
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 18:54 +, Calum Benson wrote:
you could have reply to me to my email I sent you some months ago
asking for the status of
the change.
I did, attached again just for the record.
[snip]
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:04 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
stage I guess it's a release team
decision.
Sure.
Well, I've been shooting with the patch reverted. Shaun, how much
documentation will reverting this patch cause regressions too?
Sounds like it was just a mistake and since no one uses the default
theme because it's so insidiously ugly
http://oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au/~davyd/misc/gtk-theme-nuts.png
This seems completely b0rked to me.
I just installed the latest version of gnome-themes and tried the broken
Simple.
I like what I see there better than the normal version that will be reverted
back to. Granted, the button
quote who=Eugenia Loli-Queru
http://oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au/~davyd/misc/gtk-theme-nuts.png
This seems completely b0rked to me.
I just installed the latest version of gnome-themes and tried the broken
Simple. I like what I see there better than the normal version that will
be
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:52:54 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing the insetting makes the theme look so flat and old and boring that
it ain't even funny:
http://www.osnews.com/img/9810/cl.png
Please, don't remove the insettiness/color of the menu. Leave it as is.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:12 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
http://oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au/~davyd/misc/gtk-theme-nuts.png
This seems completely b0rked to me.
I like what I see there better than the normal version that will be reverted
back to. Granted, the button color is a tiny bit
, these colors were meant for the Default theme, not for Simple.
However, applying the same principles on Simple with more matching colors,
here's a quick try:
http://www.gnomefiles.org/shots/simple.png
(note: this looks ok on my Linux laptop LCD, but it still doesn't look right
when I look
Hey all,
What do you want in a new default theme? I'm looking for everything
from big-picture to details. I don't want information like the
$insert_widget should look like $insert_existing_theme I want
information like the $insert_widget should look like
$insert_description which can
quote who=Aidan Delaney
What do you want in a new default theme? I'm looking for everything
from big-picture to details. I don't want information like the
$insert_widget should look like $insert_existing_theme I want
information like the $insert_widget should look like
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 19:29 +, Aidan Delaney wrote:
Hey all,
What do you want in a new default theme? I'm looking for everything
from big-picture to details. I don't want information like the
$insert_widget should look like $insert_existing_theme I want
information like
On Thu, 2005-17-02 at 06:36 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Aidan Delaney
What do you want in a new default theme? I'm looking for everything
from big-picture to details. I don't want information like the
$insert_widget should look like $insert_existing_theme I want
information
34 matches
Mail list logo
