Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-27 Thread Jan Schmidt
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:06 +0300, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Felix Riemannfriem...@gnome.org wrote: I'd rather keep gst-mixer at least until GNOME 3.0 (or a bit longer; Also, it is used in Solaris, because they don't ship PulseAudio (they use Solaris

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.07.09 09:00, Diego Escalante Urrelo (die...@gnome.org) wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:02 +0200, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.07.09 12:00, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@sun.com wrote: Solaris continues to use gst-mixer since Solaris does not yet provide PulseAudio.  PulseAudio doesn't provide as much value on Solaris since

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.07.09 04:46, Brian Cameron (brian.came...@sun.com) wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building them can use the 2.26 branch PulseAudio doesn't provide as much value on Solaris since

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 17.07.09 09:41, Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) wrote: In all cases, pass-thru setups are too hard to setup on Linux, so it's not like the extra fiddling will hurt anyone (for now anyway). Currently, using ALSA, it’s just a check box to tick in gst-mixer. Unless you can detect

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-22 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2009/7/22 Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de: On Wed, 15.07.09 04:46, Brian Cameron (brian.came...@sun.com) wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building them can use the 2.26 branch

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 17 juillet 2009 à 00:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : Forcing PA breaks all pass-through setups, which are becoming less uncommon with HDMI spreading. And that’s not specific to Solaris. There's pasuspender for now, and there's already plans to fix this[1]. That’s good news,

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 15 juillet 2009 à 12:00 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@sun.com wrote: Solaris continues to use gst-mixer since Solaris does not yet provide PulseAudio. PulseAudio doesn't provide as much value on Solaris since OSSv4

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 01:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 15 juillet 2009 à 12:00 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@sun.com wrote: Solaris continues to use gst-mixer since Solaris does not yet provide PulseAudio.

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-15 Thread Brian Cameron
Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:29, Felix Riemannfriem...@gnome.org wrote: Regarding the non-default / deprecated widgets I'll take it like Thomas Andersen in comment 9 in above bug: it makes no sense fixing them. * gst-mixer doesn't need any fixing and works with

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-15 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@sun.com wrote: Solaris continues to use gst-mixer since Solaris does not yet provide PulseAudio.  PulseAudio doesn't provide as much value on Solaris since OSSv4 provides mixing functionalities directly in the OSS layer. Would

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-15 Thread Brian Cameron
Patryk: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@sun.com wrote: Solaris continues to use gst-mixer since Solaris does not yet provide PulseAudio. PulseAudio doesn't provide as much value on Solaris since OSSv4 provides mixing functionalities directly in the OSS layer.

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-15 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:02 +0200, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building them can use the 2.26 branch Not

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-15 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelodie...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:02 +0200, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Felix Riemann
Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 23:43 +0300 schrieb Marc-André Lureau: Hi Hey! On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: Less than 5 modules with non-low Gtk-Deprecated-Symbols. = NOT COMPLETED

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Jaap A. Haitsma
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:29, Felix Riemannfriem...@gnome.org wrote: Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 23:43 +0300 schrieb Marc-André Lureau: Hi Hey! On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: Less than 5 modules with non-low Gtk-Deprecated-Symbols.

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building them can use the 2.26 branch Not sure if somebody still uses gst-mixer (at least Fedora is using

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Felix Riemann
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Jaap A. Haitsma: Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2 completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building them can use the 2.26 branch I'd rather keep gst-mixer at least until GNOME 3.0 (or a bit

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Felix Riemannfriem...@gnome.org wrote: I'd rather keep gst-mixer at least until GNOME 3.0 (or a bit longer; Also, it is used in Solaris, because they don't ship PulseAudio (they use Solaris Audio or OSS, I am not sure :) vu-meter, gnome-cd and cdd-slave

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-14 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 12:29 +0200 schrieb Felix Riemann: Well, with gst-properties fixed, the default gnome-media install builds fine with deprecated symbols disabled here. Regarding the non-default / deprecated widgets I'll take it like Thomas Andersen in comment 9 in above bug: it

(Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-13 Thread Andre Klapper
Only covering milestones here listed for GNOME 2.27.4 in http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven . For the rest see http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-June/msg00059.html Note that removing libgnome(ui) usage is quite stuck currently. Stats for all projects at

Re: (Partial) GNOME 3 status update

2009-07-13 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: Less than 20 modules depending on libglade. = PATCHES awaiting review by maintainers: gdm, gnome-media, gnome-panel, sound-juicer, zenity For gnome-media,

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-23 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 16:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Evolution-Data-Server must be migrated to D-Bus by default = NOT COMPLETED. Evolution schedule currently discussed. Git branch at

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-23 Thread Jaap A. Haitsma
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 20:20, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, Le lundi 22 juin 2009, à 13:30 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit : FWIW, Matthias done a great job both porting apps as well as creating /

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-22 Thread David Zeuthen
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 16:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: = Complete migration from HAL to DeviceKit-* by 2.27.3 This also includes libudev/libgudev - the latter is available in udev = 143 which was just released.

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le lundi 22 juin 2009, à 13:30 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit : FWIW, Matthias done a great job both porting apps as well as creating / maintaining this page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PolicyKitOne which is useful for both distributors and the GNOME project itself. I

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, Le lundi 22 juin 2009, à 13:30 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit : FWIW, Matthias done a great job both porting apps as well as creating / maintaining this page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PolicyKitOne which is

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-21 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: I can see several options here: * This is a problem of those older distros and upstream gtk+ does not need to care about it * If'def a lot of code in the affected modules *

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-21 Thread Soeren Sandmann
Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com writes: On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 10:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: What is not covered is creation of thumbnails, for which we probably have to wait for the outcome of the 'thumbnailing service' ideas that are being floated... Is

GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Ahoj, this is a status report refering to the aims listed at http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven . MAINTAINERS: I have listed AVAILABLE PATCHES AWAITING REVIEW. Please DO take a look if your module is listed and review/commit NOW so the changes can receive enough testing for 2.28.

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: Ahoj, = THE PROBLEMS: What migration paths are missing? = libgnomeui provides retrieving

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 16:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: = ZERO modules dependening on gnome-vfs = NOT COMPLETED (Reopened): average: 1 (gst-plugins-base) This

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 10:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: What is not covered is creation of thumbnails, for which we probably have to wait for the outcome of the 'thumbnailing service' ideas that are being floated... Is GnomeDesktopThumbnailFactory recommended for the interim? Matthew Barnes

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread A. Walton
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Barnesmbar...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 10:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: What is not covered is creation of thumbnails, for which we probably have to wait for the outcome of the 'thumbnailing service' ideas that are being floated...

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Hubert Figuiere
On 06/20/2009 10:15 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: * GSEAL: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585391 To Do: A lot. Developers please start taking a look at this. GSEAL has a few outstanding bugs open that make its use impossible. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562937 To me

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Samstag, den 20.06.2009, 13:28 -0400 schrieb Hubert Figuiere: On 06/20/2009 10:15 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: * GSEAL: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585391 To Do: A lot. Developers please start taking a look at this. GSEAL has a few outstanding bugs open that make its use

Re: GNOME 3 status update

2009-06-20 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net wrote: I can see several options here:      * This is a problem of those older distros and upstream gtk+ does        not need to care about it      * If'def a lot of code in the affected modules      * Introduce those API additions