On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
> a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
> the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
> such modules as
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:41 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> The current version of gnome-speech is 0.4.11, with the '0' in there to
> indicate a lack of courage to just call it 1.0. :-) In general (not
> just for gnome-speech), I sure find it confusing to know which versions
> of which modules go
For gnome-speech: it's mostly in maintenance mode, with drivers for new
speech engines to be added over time. When something changes in
gnome-speech, I tend make a new release of gnome-speech to coincide with
the next point release of whatever happens to be coming out (i.e.,
either even or odd),
On 4/19/07, Torsten Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and
> > provide corrections and clarifications:
> >
> > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateRelease
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and
> provide corrections and clarifications:
>
> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateReleaseCycleModules
The list says that "the entire perl bindings suite" is
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
> a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
> the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
> such modules as
On 4/18/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pango totally follows GNOME's release cycle.
>
> Dasher does too as far as I remember.
I updated the page. Thanks for the correction.
/me waits for the flood of other clarifications and corrections
Elijah
_
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
> a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
> the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
> such modules as
Hi all,
So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
such modules as time has gone on, but there are still lots of existing
modules like