On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
The point is that we already use Tracker in GNOME (Documents and Boxes
depend on it) and I don't see any reason for existing apps to stop
using it and while we could compromise on some code-duplication, its
certainly a big issue if there is two
2012/5/11 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought GNOME only depended on
tracker-store and not the indexer?
The two are in the same tarball release, so it would be up to packagers to
separate them and AFAIK,
On 05/11/2012 11:30 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2012/5/11 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought GNOME only depended on
tracker-store and not the indexer?
The two are in the same tarball release, so it would be up
On 05/10/2012 03:47 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 02:47 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
So from Shotwell's point of view, would it make sense to replace its
existing SQLite store and UI? Would it not be as good as writing from
scratch?
Shotwell's database is presumably optimized for what Shotwell needs to
do. Tracker, as a
2012/5/9 Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop
Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
and a commercial backer. These are VERY important things, prolly the most
important things to take into account, you worry too much about the data
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
That's not a reason at all, Yorba seems open to work on making Shotwell more
GNOME 3 friendly... so those widgets can be shared anyway
Therefore, for these reasons, if you look at the gnome-photos tree, it
is
On 05/10/2012 06:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:14 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
and a commercial backer. These are
It is my understanding that Jon had discussions with the developers of these
applications, and for various reasons it was decided that writing something
from scratch is better. For EoG and GThumb the reason given was that their
maintainers did not have time to work on a major redesign, and for
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:10 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
snip
We would gladly ONLY index data that's of interest to the user/desktop
applications if you could come up with heuristics for that. I touched on
that somewhat in my response earlier. Also, having superfluous coverage
is better
The point is that we already use Tracker in GNOME (Documents and Boxes
depend on it) and I don't see any reason for existing apps to stop
using it and while we could compromise on some code-duplication, its
certainly a big issue if there is two entities harvesting metadata
from tons of
Debarshi,
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Shotwell's goals are exactly those laid out in the design document below: to be
a lightweight, elegant photo browser/viewer for GNOME supporting basic
manipulation, easy photo sharing/publishing, slideshows and so on. If the
GNOME team feels
A quick followup: in my last post I didn't mean to accuse the GNOME design team
of being uncooperative. In fact, we have had some past discussions about this
in which we've realized that there are differences between Shotwell today and
the vision in the GNOME Photos design document, both in
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a photo manager that I wrote during the dying
Hello everybody!
Around 10 days ago I started implementing Photos as laid out in these designs:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Photos
The Git tree is at: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-photos
Currently the application does not do much other than showing a blank window,
but most of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
