On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 02:36 +, Rob Taylor wrote:
Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
Op dinsdag 12-02-2008 om 13:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Shaun
McCance:
I've used it for grabbing tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. Unfortunately,
it's not as useful as it could be, since the gnome-vfs
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 01:30 +0100, Mattias Bengtsson wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 01:26 +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Moreover, a regression is a regression, and should be prioritized. Btw,
how much useful is having WebDAV and ObexFTP in before normal FTP
support?
No idea what is used
Op woensdag 13-02-2008 om 11:06 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Alexander
Larsson:
Well, gvfs already does this for the uris it supports. Its one of the
main features of it. Any app can open and save to files on gvfs
shares.
A dumb question maybe, but why is it needed to re-implement
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
ti., 12.02.2008 kl. 16.32 +0100, skrev Andre Klapper:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release date matters. What matters
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:28 +0100, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
Op woensdag 13-02-2008 om 11:06 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Alexander
Larsson:
Well, gvfs already does this for the uris it supports. Its one of the
main features of it. Any app can open and save to files on gvfs
shares.
ti., 12.02.2008 kl. 16.32 +0100, skrev Andre Klapper:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release date matters. What matters
here is a _product_. It should
I use ftp:// on Nautilus daily to connect to six-to-seven different FTP
servers on a GNOME 2.20 workstation at work. It's a little bit shaky,
but usable.
Now on GNOME 2.21.x at home, I use lftp on a terminal, 'cause I don't
fear typing :-).
However there are quite a lot of people out there
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 01:26 +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Moreover, a regression is a regression, and should be prioritized. Btw,
how much useful is having WebDAV and ObexFTP in before normal FTP
support?
No idea what is used the most or anything. But i use ObexFTP daily at
work transfering
Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
Op dinsdag 12-02-2008 om 13:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Shaun
McCance:
I've used it for grabbing tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. Unfortunately,
it's not as useful as it could be, since the gnome-vfs ftp backend
doesn't follow symlinks. So if you try to use
Op dinsdag 12-02-2008 om 13:30 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Shaun
McCance:
I've used it for grabbing tarballs from ftp.gnome.org. Unfortunately,
it's not as useful as it could be, since the gnome-vfs ftp backend
doesn't follow symlinks. So if you try to use Nautilus to grab all
the
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:20 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
ti., 12.02.2008 kl. 16.32 +0100, skrev Andre Klapper:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 17:11 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So I suggest - delay the release. Delay Ubuntu LTS. Delay also other
distro releases. Why? Because not release date matters. What matters
here is a _product_. It should be usable, it should be documented,
it is *definitely*
Yeah, i also don't see the regressions as major. I mean, its not like
gnome-vfs is bugfree. The reason we're going from it is because its
problematic.
I have to disgraee. I think they are. The end user is more likely to see
these regression than any bug or design issue that gnome-vfs has.
13 matches
Mail list logo
