On Thu, 22.09.05 10:06, Alexander Larsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The first time an application that uses gnome-vfs calls
gnome_vfs_open_directory (or gnome_vfs_async_load_directory) on
dns-sd://local/ (which will do a query for interesting fileshares using
mDNS) we:
1) start
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 00:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Yes, it's ugly to support synchronous operation on top of mDNS optimally. But
that's the way it is.
I think you're sort of misguided at how this currently works, and not
very good at describing exactly how your optimal solution
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 23:33 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:17 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I'm not saying Avahi needs a mainloop. However, GServiceBrowser clearly
needs one. Anyway, I was just explaining why the gnome-vfs dns-sd code
looks like it does. It seemed
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 23:33 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:17 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I'm not saying Avahi needs a mainloop. However, GServiceBrowser clearly
needs one. Anyway, I was just
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 15:48 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote:
That is not correct, Avahi caches all authorative responses it has *seen*,
there is no way to guarantee the data in the cache is complete and can quite
easily not be, if you wanted to keep a fresh cache you would need a
program running in
On Mon, 19.09.05 09:24, Alexander Larsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 23:33 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:17 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I'm not saying Avahi needs a mainloop. However, GServiceBrowser clearly
needs one. Anyway, I was
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 22:37 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:50:55PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Is there any reasons to prefer Apple's Bonjour over Howl? The license
problems are the same in both implementations, and we can at least have
some influence on Howl. See
On Fri, 16.09.05 10:01, Alexander Larsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Avahi is going to end up much better for us. It integrates with our
main loop; talks via D-BUS; has bindings in C# and Python (and
probably other stuff); is LGPL (all of it); and all in all looks
superior to any existing
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 16:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 16.09.05 10:01, Alexander Larsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm sure your hot new code is a thousand times nicer than the dns-sd
stuff in GNOME-VFS. However, that code is the way it is for a reason.
Since this code is
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will be better tested.
Initial patches that support both from hpj:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312953
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will be better tested.
Initial patches that support both from hpj:
On Iau, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will be better tested.
What makes you assume that ?
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 14:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:37 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 14:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the
On Iau, 2005-09-15 at 09:49 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
The fact that its a core piece of apple technology and heavily used
throughout their system. Every single mac user bumps into it.
Like iTunes5 8)
I'd second the comments people have made about Apple's total failure to
work with as opposed
Hi,
Avahi does sem to be the right way forward. It seems fairly feature
complete, stable and a lot of people are reporting that they are/going
to use it.
What are the compelling reasons for choosing either? Is it purely licensing?
Jono
___
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:50:55PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Is there any reasons to prefer Apple's Bonjour over Howl? The license
problems are the same in both implementations, and we can at least have
some influence on Howl. See how well Apple works with the KDE community.
Not really
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 09:59 -0400, JP Rosevear a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:37 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 14:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:50 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 09:59 -0400, JP Rosevear a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:37 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 14:30 +0100, Bastien
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 01:10 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=JP Rosevear
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will be better tested.
That happened a while
quote who=JP Rosevear
That happened a while ago. Unfortunately, the daemon is still APSL2, so
we should not be recommending that our distributors ship it by
supporting it.
We already are with howl since it uses the same daemon.
Yes, and this is bad. Luckily we've been able to express
JP,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:18:01AM -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has
re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and
almost certainly bonjour will be better tested.
Initial patches that support both from
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 00:55 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote:
It is also possible to use it for all of KDE now as Jakub Steiner has
ported his DNSSD API in KDE to it.
Do we have an homonym of our Jimmac working on KDE, or did you get the
surname wrong? :)
---
Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:01:53PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 00:55 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote:
It is also possible to use it for all of KDE now as Jakub Steiner has
ported his DNSSD API in KDE to it.
Do we have an homonym of our Jimmac working on KDE, or did you
Dnia czwartek, 15 września 2005 16:55, Bastien Nocera napisał:
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:50 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 09:59 -0400, JP Rosevear a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:37 +0200, Frederic
25 matches
Mail list logo
