Tommi Komulainen writes:
On 2/7/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) I believe we should pick a file format that did not already look
antiquated when it was first employed in wanda the fish 5 years ago.
Even gif animations look modern and featureful compared to this.
FWIW we
On 2/7/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) I believe we should pick a file format that did not already look
antiquated when it was first employed in wanda the fish 5 years ago.
Even gif animations look modern and featureful compared to this.
FWIW we chose to use ANIs for animations
Il giorno lun, 06/02/2006 alle 21.57 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
On 2/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the conversation about making g-i-t a 'platform API' - now how major
do you think this change is? :-)
If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform,
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 18:09 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Federico Mena Quintero
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 13:36 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
6. Create a subpackage of symlinks from the missing icons (the old icon
names)
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 13:09 -0500, Rodney Dawes wrote:
1. Can we get this mess fixed (either by fixing apps, or by providing
fallbacks/symlinks/whatever) before the 2.14 release?
I see no problems with getting things patched to use new icons, and
adding symlinks/fallbacks where
quote who=Federico Mena Quintero
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 13:36 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
6. Create a subpackage of symlinks from the missing icons (the old icon
names) to the new icons. If you don't have a new icon that matches,
find the closest generic one, or simply put in
Quoting Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dude, why are we supporting this *wholly inappropriate* late breakage? This
is not the kind of change that we should meekly accept at this stage of the
release process. We don't *have* to do this, and we *shouldn't* do it. This
is a choice between release
quote who=Elijah Newren
Dude, why are we supporting this *wholly inappropriate* late breakage? This
is not the kind of change that we should meekly accept at this stage of the
release process. We don't *have* to do this, and we *shouldn't* do it. This
is a choice between release
On 2/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the conversation about making g-i-t a 'platform API' - now how major
do you think this change is? :-)
If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform, it should
also be pointed out
that the latest releases of g-i-t have added
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 2/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the conversation about making g-i-t a 'platform API' - now how major
do you think this change is? :-)
If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform, it should
also be pointed out
that the latest
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:21:36PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform, it should
also be pointed out
that the latest releases of g-i-t have added animations in the form of
stuff-all-frames-in-a-png. While I think that adding support for
11 matches
Mail list logo
