On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Luis Menina wrote:
7. Who would do the work ? As someone already explained, this is not how
things work in a community. The ones who decide are not the ones who want,
but the ones who actually do the job.
I do agree with most of your points, with this caveat:
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 01:40 +0200, Luis Menina wrote:
Wolter Hellmund a écrit :
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation
Hi,
I'm going to summarize why I am strongly against that proposal. My
reflexion is based on what I saw in
Wolter Hellmund a écrit :
I suggest that a new component in the GNOME bug database is created that
corresponds to the purpose of innovating GNOME. This way, the people who
are not serious about suggesting ideas to implement will be avoided at a
big percentage; the people who will contribute with
Wolter Hellmund a écrit :
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation
Hi,
I'm going to summarize why I am strongly against that proposal. My
reflexion is based on what I saw in Mandriva's equivalent to Ubuntu
brainstorm.
1. This creates
Andre Klapper a écrit :
On a related note:
What I agree with is that GNOME is missing a kind of bazaar where people
can post their ideas (that do not cover one existing application) and
find other people willing to work on it.
Wouldn't the wiki be a good place for that ? One could just
Because this proposal has been already widely discussed previously in
this mailing list, I request the resolution of it. But before you take a
side, I suggest you to read all the comments on this project proposal.
I would like to remember you all that this project is not supposed to
replace the
Wolter,
While I think this is an interesting idea, I don't thing your email below is
necessarily the right way to approach this.
When you say you below - whom are you referring to? GNOME is a
distributed project with hundreds of volunteers all over the world. What
infrastructure would be used?
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 18:39 -0500, Paul Cutler wrote:
Wolter,
While I think this is an interesting idea, I don't thing your email
below is necessarily the right way to approach this.
When you say you below - whom are you referring to? GNOME is a
distributed project with hundreds of
Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 20:20 -0400 schrieb Jud Craft:
There is one good reason why this is a good idea: GNOME's support
system is too compartmentalized.
This shows up all the time in bug reports. People have no idea which
component to file against (for particularly tricky
Hi!
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
...so Bugsquad and developers move it to the correct product.
Happens sometimes and will always happen.
In this context I don't see an argument related to this discussion.
I disagree here. Assuming you go to b.g.o and click on
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
...so Bugsquad and developers move it to the correct product.
Happens sometimes and will always happen.
In this context I don't see an argument related to this discussion.
I'm of the opinion voiced by Johannes. An intimidating issue
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:37 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Wolter Hellmund wolte...@gmail.com wrote:
The project is intended to use a Brainstorm System, which is already
provided by
IdeaTorrent. It is already implemented in successful projects such as
There is one good reason why this is a good idea: GNOME's support
system is too compartmentalized.
This shows up all the time in bug reports. People have no idea which
component to file against (for particularly tricky situations, even
developers have to do some investigation before they arrive
Mr. Craft,
I think you've hit one of the most important points in favor of the
GNOME Innovation Project, and I thank you for that. It is indeed a quest
for the user to file a bug report. The system is not very friendly with
people who use their computer for simple tasks such as email, web
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in HTML format for easier comprehension.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Wolter Hellmund wolte...@gmail.com wrote:
The project is intended to use a Brainstorm System, which is already provided
by
IdeaTorrent. It is already implemented in successful projects such as Ubuntu
Brainstorm, SourceForge.net and others.
Is there any data
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:20 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in HTML format for easier comprehension.
Please use ASCII. Some
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 20:40 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:20 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:57 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 20:40 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:20 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new member of the GNOME contributors community.
In the following message, I will
Well, I am really sorry for using HTML. I thought it would be liked.
Well, there is no data indicating that Ubuntu Brainstorm works better
than filing enhancement bugs, for that takes the elaboration of an
investigation I am not prepared to launch.
As far as I know, there is no user-accessible
Wolter:
I think your graphic flowchart is a good start. However, a lot of
GNOME modules do not really have active maintainers. To date, I think
the community has dealt with that problem in an ad hoc manner. However,
if we are going to formalize how such a process works, then I think
i would
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:11 -0600, Wolter Hellmund wrote:
Well, I am really sorry for using HTML. I thought it would be liked.
Ups. Sorry if I was too mean. I'm just somehow old-style person who
still uses USENET ;)
AFAIK HTML in email is not liked very much among at least some old-style
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 12:20 -0600 schrieb Wolter Hellmund:
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in HTML format for easier comprehension.
On a related note:
What I agree with is that GNOME is missing a kind of bazaar where people
When we were having discussions on version control systems, one of the ideas
that I had thrown out for a git/bzr over a centralized version control was
that fact that we could branch all of GNOME on an experimental branch and
create a bazaar for ideas. A lot of times in this mailing list we get
24 matches
Mail list logo
