Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Havoc Pennington
Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by. Havoc ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Andre Klapper
hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170782 , i'd say. :-)

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Havoc Pennington
Andre Klapper wrote: hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by.

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vytautas Liuolia
Indeed, but it doesn't mention GtkUnique (i.e. there's no API proposal on there) Maybe gtk-devel is a more appropriate place to start than bugzilla, I don't know. But the point is, if nobody proposes the API for gtk and gets feedback on it from gtk maints then it's pretty much known it

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:51 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: Andre Klapper wrote: hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi Vincent; thanks for the reminder. :-) On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:12 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: 1. Get this in a GTK+ release we can ship with GNOME 2.18 2. Bless GtkUnique as an external dependency 3. Include the code in the modules that want to use it for now (while waiting for a

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi Vincent; On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:13 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed I'll also request a Bugzilla product for it; I can commit it to API+ABI freeze after the 1.0 release - which should happen as soon as the

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi; On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 00:10 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote: Even if it implemented tabs, it's likely that the apps run on different workspaces, and it's nice to have the help browser right next to the app for which you seek help. GtkUnique would only be used so that there is

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:06 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: Hi; On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 00:10 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote: Even if it implemented tabs, it's likely that the apps run on different workspaces, and it's nice to have the help browser right next to the app for which you

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:39 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:06 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: That is the case of Firefox nowadays. It complains there is another instance running. So, you can't follow links in the another one. Yelp doesn't have to just complain:

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Don Scorgie
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 00:10 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 23:09 -0300, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote: snip Only one help browser at the time? Even if it implemented tabs, it's likely that the apps run on different workspaces, and it's nice to have the

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 15 novembre 2006, à 09:39, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:06 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: GtkUnique should support multi-head environment; I say should because I cannot test it - so if any has one should download the library and launch one of the tests and

Multi-headed gecko apps [was: Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency]

2006-11-15 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, I'd just like to point out that gecko is _not_ multi-head safe. So any single-instance application that uses gecko will need one instance _per screen_. And if it uses a (gecko) profile, it'll be basically impossible to use it on more than one screen at a time since you cannot share the

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-15 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: Hi; On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 00:10 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote: Even if it implemented tabs, it's likely that the apps run on different workspaces, and it's nice to have the help browser right next to the app for which you seek help. GtkUnique would only be

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Havoc Pennington
Emmanuele Bassi wrote: This can be fixed before 1.0, but given the number and usage of symbols GtkUnique exports, I would expect them to be the same in case of inclusions inside GTK+. When you submit the lib to gtk bugzilla, the gtk maintainers almost certainly will want some API changes.

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Don Scorgie
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:29 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:24 +, Richard Hughes wrote: as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed

Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi Paolo; On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:43 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote: GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed I'll also request a Bugzilla product for it; I can commit it to API+ABI freeze after the 1.0 release - which should happen as soon as the end

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Richard Hughes
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 11:56 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. Plus one from me

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:24 +, Richard Hughes wrote: as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. Plus one from me (for

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Vytautas Liuolia
Hi all, Any comments are, as always, welcome. ciao, Emmanuele. I just wanted to let you know that I reviewed GtkUnique briefly, and I like the improvements made to my original library. My time is a bit limited now to develop it actively myself, plus one developer rans out of ideas quickly,

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Paolo Borelli
Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 11.56 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME.

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
Emmanuele Bassi wrote: [...] Even if it stays an external lib, can you make sure to not use the gtk_* namespace? This way we can eventually put it into gtk at a later point without symbols conflicts. This can be fixed before 1.0, but given the number and usage of symbols GtkUnique exports, I

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi Vytautas; On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 14:49 +0200, Vytautas Liuolia wrote: Hi all, Any comments are, as always, welcome. ciao, Emmanuele. I just wanted to let you know that I reviewed GtkUnique briefly, and I like the improvements made to my original library. My time is a bit

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 11.56 +, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME.

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi Vincent; On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 17:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed I'll also request a Bugzilla product for it; I can commit it to API+ABI freeze

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 16:49, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi Vincent; On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 17:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed I'll also

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Mark Rosenstand
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:33 +, Don Scorgie wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:29 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:24 +, Richard Hughes wrote: as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 02:54 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:33 +, Don Scorgie wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:29 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:24 +, Richard Hughes wrote: as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 07:43 -0500, Paolo Borelli wrote: This would avoid yet-another-mini-lib that distro have to ship and then keep around for a long time because any random third party project may have started to depend on it. +1. - One class - One library - 4kb of private memory per

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-14 Thread Germán Poó Caamaño
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 23:09 -0300, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 02:54 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:33 +, Don Scorgie wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:29 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:24 +, Richard Hughes wrote: