Il giorno mer, 10/03/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Frederic Crozat ha scritto:
Well, I'm currently strugling with smoketesting GNOME 2.29.5 release and
there are some tarballs no longer building because new G_SEAL
deprecation were added in yesterday GTK+ 2.19.3 release and some modules
were not
Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 17:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
On 3/11/10 11:09 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
I assume the GNOME_MAINTAINER_MODE_DEFINES macro is our preferred means
of addressing this since it exists in gnome-common? It uses maintainer
mode to determine whether to enable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Frederic Crozat fcro...@mandriva.comwrote:
Le 12/01/2010 18:50, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi everyone,
just a quick reminder about deprecation flags and tarball release :
please avoid at all cost to hardcode deprecation flags in compilation
flags, when a
Le 11/03/2010 14:50, Gustavo Carneiro a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Frederic Crozat fcro...@mandriva.com
mailto:fcro...@mandriva.com wrote:
Le 12/01/2010 18:50, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi everyone,
just a quick reminder about deprecation flags and tarball
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Frederic Crozat fcro...@mandriva.comwrote:
Le 11/03/2010 14:50, Gustavo Carneiro a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Frederic Crozat fcro...@mandriva.com
mailto:fcro...@mandriva.com wrote:
Le 12/01/2010 18:50, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 19:05 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Since I'm the release team member taking care of 2.29.92 release, I'm
going to rant again against modules which are hardcoding deprecation
flags in their configure.in (or Makefile.am), even when building from
tarballs. Please, avoid
On 3/11/10 11:09 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 19:05 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Since I'm the release team member taking care of 2.29.92 release, I'm
going to rant again against modules which are hardcoding deprecation
flags in their configure.in (or Makefile.am), even
Le 12/01/2010 18:50, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi everyone,
just a quick reminder about deprecation flags and tarball release :
please avoid at all cost to hardcode deprecation flags in compilation
flags, when a module is built from a tarball (it is ok to have such
flags when building from gi
On 10/03/10 19:05, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Since I'm the release team member taking care of 2.29.92 release, I'm
going to rant again against modules which are hardcoding deprecation
flags in their configure.in (or Makefile.am), even when building from
tarballs. Please, avoid that, it is killing
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 19:05 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Since I'm the release team member taking care of 2.29.92 release, I'm
going to rant again against modules which are hardcoding deprecation
flags in their configure.in (or Makefile.am), even when building from
tarballs. Please, avoid
Hi everyone,
just a quick reminder about deprecation flags and tarball release :
please avoid at all cost to hardcode deprecation flags in compilation
flags, when a module is built from a tarball (it is ok to have such
flags when building from gi checkout).
Why, you may ask ?
Well, I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
