Module proposal: GNOME Color Manager

2010-02-18 Thread Richard Hughes
Purpose: GNOME Color Manager is a session framework for the GNOME desktop environment that makes it easy to manage easy to manage, install and generate color profiles. Target: Desktop Dependencies: gtk, vte, lcms, gudev, libtiff, cups, shared-color-profiles, gconf, xrandr, gnome-desktop,

Re: Module proposal: GNOME Color Manager

2010-02-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 10:27 +, Richard Hughes wrote: Purpose: GNOME Color Manager is a session framework for the GNOME desktop environment that makes it easy to manage easy to manage, install and generate color profiles. snip The upstream homepage:

Re: Module proposal: GNOME Color Manager

2010-02-18 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 10:27 +, Richard Hughes wrote: Purpose: GNOME Color Manager is a session framework for the GNOME desktop environment that makes it easy to manage easy to manage, install and generate color profiles. In view of the fact that the Cairo graphics library community has no

application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Colin Walters
Hi, On the subject of the Ubuntu application indicators work: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators First, +5000 that this change is being driven by designers, and +1000 that new useful code is being written. There are definite problems being solved here. Now,

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Jorge O. Castro
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Now, both of those said, I have two issues I'd like to bring up. Hi Colin, thanks for bringing this up. * In the big picture, is this something we're recommending all applications to use?  Some?  Only ones which send

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jorge O. Castro jo...@ubuntu.com wrote: We have put together a design guide for application authors here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CustomStatusMenuDesignGuidelines Feedback on this would be appreciated. Thanks, yes this is useful. * It'd be really nice to get

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:32 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: * It'd be really nice to get some discussion of how this fits in with the design plans for GNOME Shell (note that in GNOME 2 if applications use this, you have potentially *3* representations of an application in the top panel, this

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:46 -0600, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:32 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: snip But, do we agree that it makes sense for this to be in GTK+ (at least under #ifdef X11)? Ted seemed to say maybe.If we agree roughly on that, then do we want a cycle where

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote: I'll ping usability and see if we can get this on the agenda for the usability hackfest next week. Awesome! Yes, I think GTK/glib is a good place.  One of the big blockers is the requirement for DBus, Yes, clearly having

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote: I think that, as long as the APIs are really similar, porting from libappindicator to the GAppIndicator (or whatever) shouldn't be too difficult.  That

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:54 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: Have you done any research on what Windows or MacOS X provide in that area, for applications to use? How do the APIs differ? We weren't trying to match an API or duplicate one from OSX or Windows. What we were targeting is having a

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote: I think that the API is probably a little bit off topic for this list though, so I'd invite everyone interested over the Ayatana list to hash through it a little bit more.   http://launchpad.net/~ayatana If you want something

New module proposal: Simple Scan

2010-02-18 Thread Robert Ancell
I'd like to propose Simple Scan for inclusion in GNOME 3.0 Website: https://launchpad.net/simple-scan Tarballs: http://people.ubuntu.com/~robert-ancell/simple-scan/ Purpose: Simple scanning application, suitable for single-click scanning Target: Desktop Dependencies: libsane

Module Proposal: PDF Mod

2010-02-18 Thread Gabriel Burt
I'm not exactly excited to enter a possible flame fest when I'm happy doing my hacking and having users find me and tell me they like the results. But, in case others agree GNOME could benefit from this, I'm proposing PDF Mod for inclusion in GNOME 2.30. Purpose: a simple tool for doing basic

Re: application indicators

2010-02-18 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On the subject of the Ubuntu application indicators work: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators First, +5000 that this change is being driven by designers, and +1000 that new useful code