Jeff Waugh wrote:
More and more, I'm getting the balance of these two: The icons look good,
but the colours are dull (which is somewhat on purpose, because we don't
want to overwhelm the user, but they tend to come across very brown [1]).
yup, brown is the same comment I got... after asking it
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:45 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
I certainly support a new default widget theme (the popular candidates
look nice to me, no favoritism there), but please, please please don't
mess with the icon theme!
Fully agreed. The default wm is not good (difficult to click
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:11 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
More and more, I'm getting the balance of these two: The icons look good,
but the colours are dull (which is somewhat on purpose, because we don't
want to overwhelm the user, but they tend to come across very brown
I'm baffled why Run as is a problem to anyone but the balance
is hard
and the more folks can go and talk to users/potential users the
better.
Do note that Run as isn't an issue for me - it is the greater
issue of removing features in the future that some individual
doesn't see a need for,
Le lundi 14 fvrier 2005 23:29 -0500, William Lovaton a crit :
I straced some programs in both versions of Gnome and counted the number
of calls to the open() syscall. I got interesting results:
- gedit-2.8: 2700
- gedit-2.9: 780
Just as a data point, under FC3, gedit 2.8.1 does 3213 open()
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 23:24, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
I hope the Gnome HIG at least is updated to include instructions about
window sizes for common resolutions.
The draft version does suggest that the default size of a window should
be no larger than 480 pixels wide and 640 pixels high and
Gabriel Bauman wrote:
Most folks I know install GNOME, shudder, then install Bluecurve and
never look back.
Is it a Red Hat licensing issue perhaps?
I would say it's a little more than that. Bluecurve is what identifies
RedHat. I don't think that it would be appropriate to use it, legally
Hey guys,
Remember that not all user are technician and normal end users like
colors. The KDE themes and icons is very nice, I prefer GNOME but normal
users like a my girlfriend, my sister and my friends like colors.
Ok... somebody say me hey install another theme, gnome-look theres a
lot of
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:00 -0800, Gabriel Bauman wrote:
Most folks I know install GNOME, shudder, then install Bluecurve and
never look back.
Most folks I know remove GNOME and switch to KDE because they don't find
GNOME attractive with Bluecurve as default theme on Fedora or Red Hat. I
think
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 12:13 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Gabriel Bauman wrote:
Most folks I know install GNOME, shudder, then install Bluecurve and
never look back.
Is it a Red Hat licensing issue perhaps?
I would say it's a little more than that. Bluecurve is what identifies
RedHat. I don't
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 19:52 +0100, Daniel Borgmann wrote:
Well, did you take a look at Clearlooks
Just in case anyone wants a look at this engine and uses Debian, I've
got packages in http://burtonini.com/debian, specifically:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Dave Ahlswede wrote:
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:31:43 -0500
From: Dave Ahlswede [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Exciting GNOME?
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:11 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
More and more, I'm getting the
This CleanLooks is nice but I dont like menus... I think that menu need
to be same aspect at tool bar like original BlueCurve.
Everaldo.
Em Ter, 2005-02-15 s 19:52 +0100, Daniel Borgmann escreveu:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 12:13 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Gabriel Bauman wrote:
Most folks I know
ClearLooks is really nice but now we need a more atractive icon set.
Everaldo.
Em Ter, 2005-02-15 s 17:53 -0200, Everaldo Canuto escreveu:
This CleanLooks is nice but I dont like menus... I think that menu need
to be same aspect at tool bar like original BlueCurve.
Everaldo.
Em Ter,
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 18:06 -0200, Everaldo Canuto wrote:
ClearLooks is really nice but now we need a more atractive icon set.
Are they icons really that bad? Is it just the folders that most people
find boring? Most the icons seem pretty nice to me.
The biggest problem I see with the icons
--- Sean Middleditch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are they icons really that
bad? Is it just the folders that most people
find boring? Most the icons
seem pretty nice to me.
I think the GNOME Icons are on the whole really
good, and I'd strongly resist moving to some gooey kde-like icon theme. I
do
Hi,
Ok... the icons are not ugly but need more colors, I say one more time,
the end users like colors and because this some users like Kde Icons.
End users dont like gray desktop and for a moment (except for Fedora
users) the G of GNOME is a Gray.
Everaldo.
Em Ter, 2005-02-15 s 20:27 +,
After playing with Gnome 2.9.91 I've found new panel transparency really
exciting. But some things need a little bit love. For example icons in
the notification area looks ugly as they ignore panel background
settings. Also I'd love to see workspace switcher supporting
transparency. Last but not
I think the new etiquette icon theme is quite attractive... It's still
clean like the default Gnome one, but it has a refreshing new look...
Especially the mime-types... I love it...
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=19853
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:06:17 -0200, Everaldo Canuto
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 19:52 +0100, Daniel Borgmann wrote:
Well, did you take a look at Clearlooks? Someone mentioned it at the
Wiki, I tried it and it totally blew me away!
Wow. I have a new default theme. The only issue I have with it so far is
a common one with most GTK engines: menu bars
This isn't the place to start a KDE/GNOME flamewar. End users is very
general. Everyone likes something different. The current desktop
trendiness is to be flashy with colors and stuff. OS X doesn't really
have that much color. It's just a very well done interface. Making
things shiny with a
I am not intent to start a flamewar... I really like to see GNOME with a
better look but I think that the hackers know what change themes and
is very important that default theme is designed to end-users like
Windows XP and KDE 3.3.
No flames please... I am a GNOME user. :)
I dont like when I
Ok.
Em Ter, 2005-02-15 s 13:39 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru escreveu:
Look at this: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=5358
A nice icon theme. Colors and Life
Sorry, but this is just not gnome. What we see in this icon theme is
cartoonish-style icons that have absolutely no
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 21:53 +0100, Przemysaw Sowa wrote:
After playing with Gnome 2.9.91 I've found new panel transparency really
exciting. But some things need a little bit love. For example icons in
the notification area looks ugly as they ignore panel background
settings. Also I'd love to
24 matches
Mail list logo
