On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 14:52 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
If this is what
Redhat thinks of the work done
I thought it was obvious, but I'd like to point out that I'm not
speaking on behalf of Red Hat on this matter.
David
___
desktop-devel-list
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 14:52 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Well, I'm not sure that many vendors nor users really care that much
about what we include in the desktop set - they usually omit some
software in the desktop and include lots of other useful bits. I think
the picture you're trying to
Davyd Madeley wrote:
Some of us
care that the GNOME we ship and give out tarballs for is sane and cogent
and makes sense by itself.
But it doesn't make sense by itself. GNOME doesn't contain a kernel, a C
library, or an X server. It only contains half of a printing
architecture (the half that
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 11:45 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:54 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Quoting David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This was moved to gnome-power-manager by Jon, as monitor DPMS control
was considered more of
Hi Vincent,
Today at 8:24, Vincent Untz wrote:
We'll be trying something new for new modules in 2.16. I think most of
us agree that it didn't turn out well for this cycle.
Like: lets remove all desktop modules, and reevaluate them again?
Not that it would bring any concrete results, but I'd
Hi,
Metacity has branched; the stable branch is called
gnome-2-14. Development will proceed in HEAD.
Soren
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
- David's recent point in this thread about the desktop release set
not being so important also rings true to me. It's a binary in-or-out
yet there are lots of really rocking Gnome programs that are well
integrated but aren't in the
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/16/06, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Today at 8:24, Vincent Untz wrote:
We'll be trying something new for new modules in 2.16. I think most of
us agree that it didn't turn out well for this cycle.
On 2/16/06, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/16/06, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Today at 8:24, Vincent Untz wrote:
We'll be trying something new for new modules in 2.16. I think most of
hi guys : )
i don't write much on this list, but i think a few days ago i had a fantastic
idea for gnome three. it's a revolution.
awright, picture this situation. you're browsin' some web page or i dunno,
usin' xchat to chat with people, or i dunno you're listenin' to music and
enjoyin'
What I'm seeing seems like lack of guidance along with the other points
you mentioned. For instance this release team reason:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but
we'd like to see a
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 20:06 -0500, Bryan Clark wrote:
Some proposed action items (from me):
* HIG has no real notification area guidelines
To me this doesn't mean g-p-m is doing anything wrong, just that
we design / usability people are behind the game and need to get
12 matches
Mail list logo
