Jamie McCracken wrote:
Iain * wrote:
On 7/15/06, Chipzz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beagle
Quite important IMO, but we have tracker as a replacement.
I'm not holding my breath for tracker really...Call it a hunch, or
female intuition or something...
Well I suggest you try it rather than
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
On 7/15/06, Iain * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diva
Same as monodevelop.
Umm, no, its a video editor...same as pitivi.
I believe he was making a reference to the comment he made for monodevelop.
Indeed.
Do we really need an
Hi, Ghee,
On jeu, 2006-07-13 at 16:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:16 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
And the big question: We currently allow desktop modules to depend on
the pygtk bindings, but no others. Should we extend that to include
Hi,
I'm glad to see the flamewar already started ;-)
On mar, 2006-07-11 at 14:16 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
Yes
* alacarte
It's better than the current menu editor. I guess we'll
Hi Alex,
On sam, 2006-07-15 at 18:10 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
Hi Murray,
As I hinted at back in April[1], I don't think Tomboy is a blanket
replacement for sticky notes. As I said, into the abyss, a first-run
wizard for importing existing sticky notes makes more sense.
I'm somewhat
Ubuntu, Gentoo, and the other distros should come with a music editor,
a video editor, and everything else. The discussion here I believe is what
should be made part of the basic gnome distribution, and I think that
music/video editors might not qualify.
That's exactly what I meant.
Hi,
At GUADEC, Rob Bradford proposed to help maintaining pessulus and I'm
happy to give him this burden^Wopportunity. Please welcome him, hug him,
etc. He will try to fix all my bugs and add some cool features. I'll
continue to introduce bugs in the code to keep him active for some time.
Rob, in
Iain * iaingnome at gmail.com writes:
Why do we feel we are able to bless a terminal program and a text
editor and a clock, but unable to do the same to a video editor or an
audio editor?
There is a huge difference between essential programs (editor, terminal) and
specific applications (photo
On 15 Jul 2006, at 23:43, Iain * wrote:
On 7/15/06, Chipzz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or a music editor???
Well, it hasn't harmed apple in any way.
FWIW, GarageBand isn't part of OSX though... granted it currently
ships with all new Macs, but if you go out and buy OSX off the shelf,
you
On 16 Jul 2006, at 09:36, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
On 7/15/06, Chipzz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mono:
F-spot
Image viewer, really non-essential.
Come on, Eye of Gnome is an image viewer. F-Spot is a photo management
application (like iPhoto). Try asking Mac users if iPhoto is
That's exactly what I meant. Windows starting to be shipped (well,
starting...) with everything but the kitchen sink, and I hate that too.
I don't even *have* a camera, why would I need a video editor???
The question that I'm asking, and which we should be asking ourselves
is, does gnome
On 7/16/06, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iain * iaingnome at gmail.com writes:
Why do we feel we are able to bless a terminal program and a text
editor and a clock, but unable to do the same to a video editor or an
audio editor?
There is a huge difference between essential
On 16 Jul 2006, at 17:57, Lluis Sanchez wrote:
It's not so important which applications do gnome include, since
distros
can take this decision, depending on the specific target of the
distro.
Up to a point... although a distro's choice of application is also
somewhat influenced by
Iain * wrote:
Really?
depends on your context...
For some people a terminal and text editor are completely worthless,
but take away photo management
Once again, who are we targetting with the desktop. Apple know who
they're targetting, which is probably why text editor and terminal
On 7/16/06, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW what about providing the Office suite first? Because Gnome
penetration is first into large business [1] deployment, and and
Office suite is more likely to hit that target. We still don't, but
distribution vendors do.
I have no problem
Try disabling the http URI handler for GNOME.
gconf:///desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/enabled
When you click a link to a PNG image, EOG starts up. Click a link to an
M3U file, and Totem starts up. What happens, is that GNOME-VFS
determines the MIME-type of the target file with a HTTP HEAD
Alex Jones wrote:
Try disabling the http URI handler for GNOME.
gconf:///desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/enabled
[...] preferred application with that URI.
I didn't know that this behaviour existed right now. Thank you for the
hint ;-)
2. A simple web page viewer, sans-location entry.
On 16/07/06, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you tell me how? The little feed icon's gone, and I couldn't find an
rss action.
Still seems available as here:
http://live.gnome.org/RecentChanges?action=rss_rc
There is a comment at the top of that page explaining the various
options you
Replying from off-list, pardon the break. At the encouragement of
various important parties on #gnome-hackers, I am posting a copy of this
from my blog in an effort to help focus the Pro/Con-Mono argument. I am
not taking any side. This is only a summary.
So, I spent two hours reading every email
søn, 16 07 2006 kl. 23:33 -0500, skrev Jason D. Clinton:
While you provided a fine run down of arguments, I believe you forgot a
vital one, Mono can be optimized, we can cut down ressource consumption,
we can indeed do better - we cannot however make C development as fast
development in C#, nor
20 matches
Mail list logo
