Re: Introducing new GNOME SVN users

2007-09-22 Thread Johannes Schmid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Olav! Whenever a new SVN account is created, I want to suggest that the person introduces themselves on the mailing list. Not sure exactly which one. For big projects, perhaps the projects mailing list. For translators, gnome-i18n or the

Re: Introducing new GNOME SVN users

2007-09-22 Thread Ken VanDine
Perhaps we should create a wiki page, BehindTheNick with this sort of information. A little more permanent, and easier to refer to. --Ken On 9/22/07, Johannes Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Olav! Whenever a new SVN account is created, I

Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Andreas Røsdal
Hello! * Proposal: Include GtkGLExt in the GNOME developer platform. * Purpose: GtkGLExt is an OpenGL extension to GTK+ 2.0, and if accepted into the GNOME developer platform could provide OpenGL support for any GNOME application where this is useful. Language bindings available for C, C++,

Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi Andreas, Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 13:57 +0200, Andreas Røsdal a écrit : Hello! * Proposal: Include GtkGLExt in the GNOME developer platform. Oh, interesting. Note that it's possible that it will get rejected for the platform if it doesn't go in the desktop for at least one cycle,

Creating your own SVN repository

2007-09-22 Thread Olav Vitters
It is now possible to create your own GNOME SVN repository for *everyone* having a GNOME SVN account. The full instructions are at: http://live.gnome.org/NewSVNRepos But, they are short enough to repeat: 1. If you need to import the history of some existing repository (SVN or something else),

Re: Creating your own SVN repository

2007-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 14:33 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : It is now possible to create your own GNOME SVN repository for *everyone* having a GNOME SVN account. The full instructions are at: http://live.gnome.org/NewSVNRepos But, they are short enough to repeat: 1. If you

Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Davyd Madeley
Having recently used GtkGLExt, I thought I'd throw in my 2c worth. GtkGLExt appears to work, but it seems to be very picky about when things are realized and shown. I found the ordering for setting up the space to change depending on whether or not I was using Glade and when I wanted to do

Re: Creating your own SVN repository

2007-09-22 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Does the script automatically create a MAINTAINERS file? :-) Not yet. It is currently pretty simple (just installs the right commit hooks, sets permissions and fills the bonsai db). I'll check if the MAINTAINERS file is possible.

Re: Mercurial - Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))

2007-09-22 Thread Sean Kelley
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey: On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote: - Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM system to use

cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread daniel g. siegel
hey! im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks to a month vs. 6 months). anyway, here is my proposal for including cheese in 2.22.

Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread Claude Paroz
Le samedi 22 septembre 2007 à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : hey! im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks to a

Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread daniel g. siegel
On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 16:55 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: Le samedi 22 septembre 2007 à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : hey! im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the development cycle,

Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 17:07 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : It doesn't seem to be intltool compatible right now, so that would be a blocker right now. Shouldn't be so much difficult to add, though. indeed, it uses toc2 as build system. if you want to update the po-files do this:

Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : hey! im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks to a

Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?

2007-09-22 Thread daniel g. siegel
On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 17:13 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : hey! im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the development cycle,

Re: Mercurial - Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))

2007-09-22 Thread Ken VanDine
I would agree with Sean, mercurial is very powerful yet easy to use. Just my $0.02 --Ken On 9/22/07, Sean Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey: On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod

Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Andreas Røsdal
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Vincent Untz wrote: Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 13:57 +0200, Andreas Røsdal a écrit : Hello! * Proposal: Include GtkGLExt in the GNOME developer platform. Oh, interesting. Note that it's possible that it will get rejected for the platform if it doesn't go in the

Re: Mercurial - Distributed SCM in Gnome (Was: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?))

2007-09-22 Thread Mikael Hallendal
22 sep 2007 kl. 16.05 skrev Sean Kelley: Hi, On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey: On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote: - Keith Packard did a fairly

Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Sven Herzberg
Hi, Andreas Røsdal wrote: There has also been a lot of discussion about this in bug #119189 Add OpenGL support to GTK+. What about Windows support? MacOS X? DirectFB? »OpenGL support fot GTK+« should be as cross platform as GTK+ is. Regards, Sven

Re: Module proposal: GtkGLExt for GNOME 2.22

2007-09-22 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 20:51 +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote: Hi, Andreas Røsdal wrote: There has also been a lot of discussion about this in bug #119189 Add OpenGL support to GTK+. My NO for including GtkGLExt in GNOME. Instead one should go integrate its functionality in Gtk+. There's been

Re: Introducing new GNOME SVN users

2007-09-22 Thread Travis Reitter
Olav, That sounds great. I'll volunteer to be the first, as soon as my SVN account request is approved! :) (Originally requested July 24th (email dropped somehow), re-requested Sept. 4th (got the auto-reply)). -Travis On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 00:18 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: Within another