I would agree with Sean, mercurial is very powerful yet easy to use. Just my $0.02
--Ken On 9/22/07, Sean Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey: > > > > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > >> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote: > > >> - Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM > > >> system > > >> to use for xorg and other fd.o projects, from a storage robustness / > > >> performance point of view, and he wrote this excellent piece: > > >> > > >> http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html > > > > > > This document is a year old; projects that are under heavy development > > > like Bazaar are misrepresented. For instance bzr has changed it's > > > repository format, and is much faster that it was a year ago. > > > > In fairness, so is Git. It's perceived complexity is to a large part > > based on people trying it out a long time ago while it is as well > > being developed and higher level abstractions are added. > > > In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the > ease of use of SVN. We dropped GIT and SVN at my company in favor of > Mercurial. > > Sean > > > > > Cheers, > > Mikael Hallendal > > > > -- > > Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > -- Ken VanDine http://ken.vandine.org _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
