Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

2015-10-27 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote: > Hi, > > having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I > noticed that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird > mixure > of LGPL v2 versions. The text and version comes from the "old" > Library > GPL 2, but

Rygel/GUPnP licensing

2015-10-27 Thread Jens Georg
Hi, having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I noticed that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird mixure of LGPL v2 versions. The text and version comes from the "old" Library GPL 2, but as a license name we use "Lesser GPL" in the headers but Library GPL

Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

2015-10-27 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi; On 27 October 2015 at 11:19, Jens Georg wrote: > Hi, > > having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I noticed > that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird mixure of LGPL v2 > versions. The text and version comes from the "old" Library GPL

Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

2015-10-27 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote: > Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to > "proper" > LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean > this > up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)? Yes, go right ahead: