On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:49 PM Andre Klapper via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> I'd prefer adding a heads-up comment[1] and mass-close remaining open
> tickets as a courtesy to reporters, before turning Bugzilla read-only
> and then converting it to static HTML. Happy to help with that.
That would
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> But there is too much activity on
> Discourse to expect everybody to watch all activity there. Rather than
> attempt to drink from the firehose, I'd like to encourage developers to
> at least subscribe to the announcement tag [2][3].
It
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 1:36 PM Bartłomiej Piotrowski
wrote:
> I've poked around yesterday and it's apparently not as trivial to run
> buildah unprivileged in a container as it was the last time I tried. I
> don't see better way than tagging jobs privileged at the moment.
Thanks, tagging the job a
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 6:42 AM Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Does anyone have any advice on what to do with this? I followed Sam's helpful
> hint about Tracker's CI images working to [1], copied the things that looked
> like they might be relevant from there into my own gitlab-
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:53 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Have you tested this? I've tried many times and afaik GitLab is simply
> incompatible with podman images. I don't remember the exact error
> message offhand, but GitLab fails to detect podman containers as valid
> containers, even when
Hi,
Every so often I look at a change like
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker/merge_requests/58 or
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker-miners/issues/49, which change or
remove the behaviour of Meson configuration options.
Do we have a policy for if/when we can do breaking changes to Meson
c
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 7:58 PM wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:58 AM, Michael Terry
> wrote:
> > “Developer credentials (such as passwords, keys, and client IDs)
> > are intended to be used by you and identify your API Client. You will
> > keep your credentials confidential and make reasona
Hi Michael,
Thanks for all the hard work on what sounded like a particularly tricky release!
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:23 PM, wrote:
> If you want to compile GNOME 3.27.90, you can use the official BuildStream
> project snapshot. Thanks to BuildStream's build sandbox, it should build
> reliably
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> Instructions for using the gnome-build-meta BuildStream project can be
> found at:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Newcomers/BuildSystemComponent
We found a bug in BuildStream which is triggered by those
instructions. It's reported at
ht
On 7/31/17, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I'd also ask the GUADEC 2018 hosts to keep in mind the importance of
> having a good network connection for the unconference days. I'm told
> the MMU network is blocking email and IRC in addition to git. It's also
> blocking my Private Internet Access VPN.
Hi all,
The talk schedule for GUADEC is now available at:
https://www.guadec.org/schedule
You can also arrange BoF sessions during the unconference days:
https://wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2017/Unconference/
If you are planning to attend GUADEC please make sure you have
registered! You can do so
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> Out of curiosity, let's look at other GNOME-related modules that use
> gtk-doc. What is the name of the option that enables gtk-doc?
> - pango:enable_docs
> - gtk+: enable-documentation
> - graphene: enable-gtk-doc
> - a
Hi again,
The GUADEC papers deadline has been extended until 11:00 UTC tomorrow
(Tuesday 25th April).
Sam
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The GUADEC 2017 call for papers closes this Sunday, 23rd April.
>
> We have excellent submiss
://registration.guadec.org/ website.
The full announcement is below:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> The GUADEC papers committee is looking for interesting, high-quality,
> talks for this year’s conference (being held in Manchester, UK, on 28
> July to 2nd August). This i
Hello,
The GUADEC papers committee is looking for interesting, high-quality,
talks for this year’s conference (being held in Manchester, UK, on 28
July to 2nd August). This is a great opportunity to share your ideas
with the GNOME project, as well as the wider open source community. You
don’t have
On 2/11/17, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> thanks for the quick answer, unfortunately make uninstall did not
> resolve the issue. When I searched for files with gstreamer in their
> name or path I still found a lot of files. In the end I removed several
> header files and so files related to g
Hi Lanoxx
On 2/11/17, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to build gstreamer 1.10 today with jhbuild using the 3.22
> module set, and I got the following error:
...
I've seen problems like this before which were caused by: a new symbol
being added in the source tree, an older
[cc'ing tracker-l...@gnome.org]
Hi Hanno
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
> I wanted to point out a recent blogpost by IT security export Chris
> Evans:
> https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.dk/2016/11/0day-poc-risky-design-decisions-in.html
Thanks for the link.
...
> While th
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:23 PM, 藍挺瑋 wrote:
> 於 週三，2016-10-05 於 09:33 +0200，Milan Crha 提到：
> Can we have a common way to enable GTK-Doc installation in modules
> using CMake? In modules using Autotools, we have --enable-gtk-doc which
> is recognized by every module supporting generating documentat
On 05/10/16 15:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
>As much as I hate autotools and its arcane syntax, it does bring
>uniformity and consistency.
>Atm I'm counting waf (for some non-core modules), autotools, cmake and
>some are discussing to use meson/ninja.
>So while I'm not tied to auto
On 9/17/16, Daniel Beecham wrote:
> + All major web browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Internet Explorer, Opera,
> Midori and others) use ctrl-tab to switch tab. Neither nor
> consumes tab in any of these browsers, it's just used to change
> focus.
Cool, I never realised because those that I use
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Alvaro Kuolas wrote:
> The only downside I found it is the software that I do not use, but, cannot
> be "opt-out" and be left out of the installation.
>
> Specifically, I do not use and do not want Tracker and Evolution.
>
> Even more, they are very difficult
On 10/12/15, Gergely Polonkai wrote:
> If I were you, I would submit this as a patch for GTK Doc via
> bugzilla.gnome.org. I expect replies pretty soon :)
Done, I just forgot to notify the list!
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756297
Sam
___
Hello
I've been porting a project that uses GTK-Doc to use CMake as its build
system (it previously used GNU Autotools). I discovered that GTK-Doc and
CMake don't really integrate with each other as is.
A few projects seem to have solved this in their own way. So far I've
found:
Firtree:
ht
Hi
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:05 PM, fr33domlover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This question is quite general but I'd like to know how things in GNOME were
> designed, in addition to any general advice you have.
>
> Assume a GUI application uses a central data backend, e.g. Tracker.
> Currently Tracker is
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Fri 19 Aug 2011 13:33, Felipe Contreras
>> writes:
>>
>>> That's a reasonable alternative. How about "pleased"? Any other people
>>> have an opinion?
>>
>> You present yourself as
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
>>
>> A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
>> it's logged for people who can't attend. (I'm always hitting this
>> problem in GNOME trying to work out what happen
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Dave Neary wrote:
>
>> Leaving aside "because that's the way it is" as a reason for a second,
>> what are the potential issues we'd have using Launchpad?
>>
>> * Bug reporters would have to have an easy way to report bugs against
>> Deja Dup th
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Allan Day wrote:
> Michael Terry wrote:
>> Hi, Allan. Thanks for your past and continuing help with design! :)
>> Answers below.
>>
>> On 11 May 2011 11:33, Allan Day wrote:
>> > This looks like an improvement on the UI that you presented the last
>> > time you
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Sam Thursfield a écrit:
>
>> Suspend and hibernate are both hacks around the fact that power on and
>> power off take a long time and that our session manager doesn't save
>> session state.
>
> This se
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 05:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit :
>>> Other people want it because suspend doesn't work on their hardware.
>>> Adding a configuration option is ju
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:04:22AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Xavier Claessens
>> wrote:
>> > Nice. Just a question: where can I find the code for the "Several fully
>> > functional backends"? Especi
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Cody Russell wrote:
> So, right now GtkNotebook allows you to change tabs by using the mouse
> wheel. Once I noticed this and the more I thought about it, it really
> seems like a terrible feature and one that may be detrimental to
> usability.
Seems like it wou
Hi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Gabriel Burt wrote:
> I'm not exactly excited to enter a possible flame fest when I'm happy
> doing my hacking and having users find me and tell me they like the
> results. But, in case others agree GNOME could benefit from this, I'm
> proposing PDF Mod for inc
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 13:12 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
>> > Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
>> > seriously: I think what we probabl
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Johannes wrote:
> * It is definitly important to keep the user settings over the
> transition. So at least any setting that is mentioned in a schema file
> has to be migrated (others are buggy, right?). I cannot say how to do
> this but I think it is possible.
>
>
Hello!
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Cody Russell wrote:
> No, but the point is that if you edit some code and someone else has
> made changes to some code elsewhere in the repo, and you merge their
> work into yours.. then maybe you have to fix some conflicts, but maybe
> not. If you have alr
37 matches
Mail list logo
