On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Tobias Mueller
wrote:
Hi.
I welcome the proposal to modernise our development infrastructure.
On Di, 2017-05-16 at 10:38 -0400, Carlos Soriano via
desktop-devel-list
wrote:
You can take a look at their "changelogs" between releases (one
each month).
This s
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 16:24 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 at 16:17, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote:
>
> > Another potential pain point: in Bugzilla, one can move bugs
> > between
> > products. This happen when the bug has been reported to the wrong
> > product, or when triaging the bug
On 16 May 2017 at 16:17, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote:
> Another potential pain point: in Bugzilla, one can move bugs between
> products. This happen when the bug has been reported to the wrong
> product, or when triaging the bugs the developers know the bug is
> somewhere else in the stack.
>
> Gitl
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 10:51 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending
> > that GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for
> > Bugzilla and cgit.
>
> I 100% support this m
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending
> > that GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for
> > Bugzilla and cgit.
>
> I 100% support this mo
ated again.
Then we polished and minimized the wiki with the final decision in mind for
helping on getting an overview, so that's probably why you see the wiki is
written in that way.
Hope is clear now :)
Cheers,
Carlos Soriano
Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Proposal to d
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending
> that GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for
> Bugzilla and cgit.
I 100% support this move. There are inevitably going to be some pain
points, but the end
On 16 May 2017 at 15:38, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Allan Day wrote:
>> In recent months we have got together to examine the possibilities for
>> GNOME’s development infrastructure. We’ve spent a lot of time on this,
>> because we want the community to have faith i
Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Allan Day wrote:
> > In recent months we have got together to examine the possibilities for
> > GNOME’s development infrastructure. We’ve spent a lot of time on this,
> > because we want the community to have faith in our conclusions. If
Hi.
I welcome the proposal to modernise our development infrastructure.
On Di, 2017-05-16 at 10:38 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> You can take a look at their "changelogs" between releases (one each month).
This seems to be the most risky part about moving to GitLab: Havin
On 2017-05-16 09:22 AM, Allan Day wrote:
We are confident that GitLab is a good choice for GNOME, and we can’t
wait for GNOME to modernise our developer experience with it. It will
provide us with vastly more effective tools, an easier landing for
newcomers, and lots of opportunities to improve t
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Allan Day wrote:
> In recent months we have got together to examine the possibilities for
> GNOME’s development infrastructure. We’ve spent a lot of time on this,
> because we want the community to have faith in our conclusions. If you are
> interested in this, you
st release, you can overview how many features they do in a
month of work
https://about.gitlab.com/2017/04/22/gitlab-9-1-released/#protected-tags-ce-ees-eep
Cheers,
Carlos Soriano
Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
Local Time: May 16, 2017 4:15 P
e the opportunity to focus
on the priority ones.
Best regards,
Carlos Soriano
Original Message
Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
Local Time: May 16, 2017 4:09 PM
UTC Time: May 16, 2017 2:09 PM
From: h...@figuiere.net
To: desktop-devel-list
On 16/05/17 09:22 AM,
Original Message
Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
Local Time: May 16, 2017 3:48 PM
UTC Time: May 16, 2017 1:48 PM
From: hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Allan Day
desktop-devel-list
On 16 May 2017 at 14:22, Allan Day wrote:
> The outcome of this evaluation process
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> [Written on behalf of Alberto Ruiz, Carlos Soriano, Andrea Veri,
> Emmanuele Bassi and myself.]
Hi !
I'd first like to say that I would love it that we embrace gitlab and
run our own gitlab instance to manage GNOME's gits.
There are some grea
On 16/05/17 09:22 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending that
> GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for Bugzilla and
> cgit.
I'm totally supportive of the idea. While it is a proposal, I just have
a couple of questions about th
On 16 May 2017 at 14:22, Allan Day wrote:
> The outcome of this evaluation process is that we are recommending that
> GNOME sets up its own GitLab instance, as a replacement for Bugzilla and
> cgit.
This is great news. Over the last few years I've started most of my
new projects on GitHub and the
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
