Re: Testing for memory safety issues with Address Sanitizer

2016-09-21 Thread Tobias Mueller
Hi. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:17:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > undefined symbol: __asan_option_detect_stack_use_after_return > > Is anything special needed for dlopened modules? Try LDFLAGS+=-lasan Another source of inconvenience is when compiling any library that GCC needs itself,

GNOME 3.22 released

2016-09-21 Thread Matthias Clasen
The GNOME Project is proud to announce the release of GNOME 3.22, "Karlsruhe". This release brings comprehensive Flatpak support. GNOME Software can install and update Flatpaks, GNOME Builder can create them, and the desktop provides portal implementations to enable sandboxed applications.

Re: Testing for memory safety issues with Address Sanitizer

2016-09-21 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 16:14 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote: > Try LDFLAGS+=-lasan ==21260==ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list; you should either link runtime to your application or manually preload it with LD_PRELOAD. > Another source of inconvenience is when compiling any

Re: GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due (and more) (responsible: mclasen)

2016-09-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
Great stuff, thanks! > On 21 Sep 2016, at 21:21, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 21:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> Matthias rebuilt the version set at least once today in order to pick >> up stragglers. Not sure why your releases didn't get in;

Re: GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due (and more) (responsible: mclasen)

2016-09-21 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 21:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Matthias rebuilt the version set at least once today in order to pick > up stragglers. Not sure why your releases didn't get in; seems like > today's other releases didn't either. I'll let him answer. Checking today, it did get in,

Re: GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due (and more) (responsible: mclasen)

2016-09-21 Thread Murray Cumming
On Di, 2016-09-20 at 19:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > glibmm, [snip] gtkmm, I generally don't do a .0 version of glib or gtkmm until the .0 version of glib and gtk+ exists. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com ___

Re: Testing for memory safety issues with Address Sanitizer

2016-09-21 Thread Philip Withnall
Hi, On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 12:03 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: > I recently reported a couple of bugs to GNOME-components that were > easily discovered with a feature called Address Sanitizer (asan): > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762417 (glib) >