** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #18
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18
** Also affects: zsh (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
zsh is not really fixed. Please see the changelog entry of 5.6.2-3 which
states:
* [92175749] Revert "Switch from the deprecated libpcre3 to the newer
(!) libpcre2." libpcre2 is not a drop-in replacement and not detected
by zsh's configure script. (Closes: #909084, reopens LP#1792544)
ck to Incomplete. I'll revert that commit from the recent 5.6.2-2
upload.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-|
zsh in Debian Unstable (5.6.2-1) seems to build fine if I exchange
libpcre3-dev by libpcre2-dev in Build-Depends and Build-Using (via
debian/rules).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
ution-only patch.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 20
I do not want to add any further patches to Debian's screen package
which makes it differ from upstream behaviour more than it already does.
(Of course, it's a different thing if issues are caused by existing
patches.)
And IMHO workarounds for issues in other packages do not belong into
shell
Please see this new section in README.Debian, which will be published
with the next upload of Debian's screen package to Debian Unstable:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-
maint/screen.git/tree/debian/README.Debian#n142
I don't see any other feasible solution to this problem from the side
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #854414
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854414
** Also affects: screen (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854414
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
Will test it.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E
Ehm, precise is still supported until April 2017. And that bug is still
present in precise. So reopening...
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
ss, I'd prefer to keep that bug
open at least until precise is gone, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 C
This still happens on Trusty and fills the syslog... Is there a chance
to get that fixed in Trusty, too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379368
Title:
AppArmor
We just ran into an issue with symptoms as described here on Ubuntu
12.04.5 LTS Precise with gvfs-backends 1.12.1-0ubuntu1.2.
gvfsd-http seems to have been started by evince.
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) = gdm (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1390537
Title:
gdm depends on evolution-data-server-common
Status in “gdm” package in
The alternative Suggests on the non-existent xfs is already fixed in
wdm's version in Utopic (1.28-17).
** Changed in: wdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
I don't think that's an issue with unclutter.
unclutter is only involved if the cursor vanishes after the mouse isn't
moved for a few seconds or if a key is pressed.
But according to the original report, the mouse cursor isn't seen at all
(at least over some windows) and according to #23
** Package changed: screen (Ubuntu) = xscreensaver (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xscreensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1287388
Title:
screensaver fails to start
Status in “xscreensaver”
Hi,
Christopher M. Penalver wrote:
Axel Beckert, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an
issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development
release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from
** Summary changed:
- Changes window focus in Xmonad window manager
+ Changes window focus in Xmonad window manager (no focus-follows-mouse)
** Summary changed:
- Changes window focus in Xmonad window manager (no focus-follows-mouse)
+ Changes window focus in Xmonad window manager (without
Can you check if the problem still appears with unclutter 8-19? It's
available from Saucy onwards.
See http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unclutter/news/20130502T003252Z.html
(or https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unclutter/+bug/385034) for
the changelog entry.
According to
flwm does not use xlib directly but through FLTK. Hence flwm is the
wrong place to file such a bug report.
** Changed in: flwm (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
This error happens if a second instance of unclutter is started and
triggers the first time. The original process seems to become a zombie
under some circumstances.
A test if an unclutter instance is already running on the current
display would probably solve that issue.
** Changed in: unclutter
** Changed in: unclutter (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unclutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368862
Title:
unclutter default idle time is too short
Status
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 385034 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385034
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 385034
unclutter: cursor flashes repeatedly over GTK apps., takes 100% CPU
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
in README.source.
-- Axel Beckert a...@debian.org Thu, 02 May 2013 02:15:08 +0200
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #266118
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266118
** Also affects: unclutter (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266118
** Changed in: unclutter (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unclutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600916
Title:
Maverick: No easy way to adjust idle time in
dead buried
I wouldn't say so.
IMHO there is an easy way to change the default idle time of unclutter:
Edit /etc/default/unclutter.
Then again, you and some more people consider this unreasonable. If you
can explain a little bit more, why you consider that unreasonable or how
you think that
** Changed in: dillo (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433232
Title:
Over-long error message for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 54148 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54148
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 54148
unclutter -keystroke does not work
** Summary changed:
- unclutter doesn't hide firefox pointer
+ unclutter doesn't hide firefox pointer
Hi,
drink wrote:
The program 'unclutter' which hides the mouse pointer after timeout or
when typing doesn't work in firefox. The pointer doesn't go away, even
with the -visible option.
Which Firefox version do you use?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org
to me so far.
Thanks!
On a first glance I couldn't reproduce the issue with Quantals'
Firefox tunneled via SSH. I'll check when I get a chance to sit
locally at a Quantal box.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe
JFTR: There are tons of other browers in Ubuntu which are even above the
discussed 70 as used by Debian:
* 0/usr/bin/google-chrome 200 auto mode
1/usr/bin/arora 90manual mode
2/usr/bin/epiphany-browser 85manual
Hi,
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote on 2011-10-25:
Robert said he will look at it for the next SRU round
Any ETA when this will happen?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
care a shit about distributions IMHO), to do such a
thing. And it's the browser makers where this should start. Maybe the
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) is a better place to dump/plant this
wish/idea.
Regards, Axel (with his links{,2}, dillo and conkeror maintainer hat on)
--
,''`. | Axel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862154 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862154
** Package changed: screen (Ubuntu) = gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
35 matches
Mail list logo
