** Attachment added: gvfs-backends_1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2916247/+files/gvfs-backends_1.10.0-0ubuntu2%2Bjml3_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-dbg_1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2916248/+files/gvfs-dbg_1.10.0-0ubuntu2%2Bjml3_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: gvfs_1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2916244/+files/gvfs_1.10.0-0ubuntu2%2Bjml3_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs
** Attachment added: gvfs-fuse_1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2916689/+files/gvfs-fuse_1.10.0-0ubuntu2%2Bjml3_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-fuse_1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2916699/+files/gvfs-fuse_1.10.0-0ubuntu2%2Bjml3_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
Ego, I have the precise build now, let me upload it. Again, these
packages are for testing purposes only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858
Title:
regression in gvfs
** Attachment added: gvfs_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917597/+files/gvfs_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs
** Attachment added: gvfs-backends_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917608/+files/gvfs-backends_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-bin_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917611/+files/gvfs-bin_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: gvfs-common_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_all.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917612/+files/gvfs-common_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_all.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-daemons_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917613/+files/gvfs-daemons_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-bin_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917614/+files/gvfs-bin_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: gvfs-fuse_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917615/+files/gvfs-fuse_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: gvfs-libs_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+attachment/2917616/+files/gvfs-libs_1.11.4-0ubuntu2%2Bjml1_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
By the way, the precise builds have only been compile tested.
Additionally, you should not have to do this, but just in case you get a
permission denied type message : sudo hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: dp-unity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915828
Title:
ibus not getting
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-good0.10 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947808
Title:
Can't see the webcam video during OOBE
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to yelp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451673
Title:
Untranslated Yelp main page (Ubuntu Help
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Fix Released = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I've created a more minimal patch that leaves 05_shared_libdaemon.patch
in tact while still fixing the problem. The problem is having libdaemon
as a shared library causes dbus timeouts. Please let me know what you
think.
I will upload a patch against 12.04 later today.
** Attachment added:
I think the fix to that is an upgraded obexd as in bug 879923. This bug
was opened from that bug to deal specifically with browsing.
The patch that I've posted fixes :
---
Could not display obex://[(BT_address)]/.
Error: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply.
In order to test this I connected to my Nokia N9. At first, I got a
Connection refused message, but then after issuing sudo hciconfig
hci0 sspmode 0 on the command line, I was able to browse my phone using
gvfs-1.10.0-0ubuntu2+jml3. I suspect using gvfs-1.10.0-0ubuntu2 would
result in dbus
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #663098
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663098
** Also affects: gvfs (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663098
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Also affects: oem-priority/oneiric
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: oem-priority/precise
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
Assignee: (unassigned) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed
The first bad version is gvfs-1.8.0-1. This regression is caused by
05_shared_libdaemon.patch. It isn't exactly clear to me why this is, but
if I take out the patch and build with the libgvfscommon0 package as was
done in gvfs-1.8.0-0ubuntu1 and earlier, I can successfully mount the
phone.
I have
This reverts 05_shared_libdaemon.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858
Title:
regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ursula Junque (ursinha)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933322
Title:
LightDM graphic corruption with
- one other thing that I notice that is different than 11.10, and that is my
session background also appears as my login
background; that is, I chose the watch gears background for my session, and
afterwards, whenever I see a login screen, it also
has watch gears
I believe this is a
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780117
Title:
I'm still investigating this on a motorola RAZR V3XX. I have the same
behavior as comment #0, except I don't get a connection refused. Instead
I get our favorite:
Error mounting location: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply:
Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote
Okay, take it back, this is definitely a gvfs bug. I must have only
installed gvfs package from the previous comment and forgot to install
all the dependent libraries. With a version of gvfs from natty
(1.8.0-0ubuntu2) compiled for Oneiric, I can't reproduce this bug.
I'm bisecting now.
** No
** Tags added: bluetooth
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858
Title:
regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780117
Title:
Brasero finishes without error but unusable
Marking Invalid for now because it seems to work, but may be dependent
on the hardware. If this is an issue with OEM again I will reopen.
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Won't Fix = Invalid
--
You received this bug
Looked at this more today, My guess would be the 1 second
delta_notice_timeout in gs-watcher-x11.c . For some reason this causes
a function to loop until it locks the screen. I'm guessing that this
might be useful if the screensaver has detected it should be blanking
but is unable to.
It's also
For reference: http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.30/glib-The-Main-Event-
Loop.html#g-timeout-add
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889278
Title:
Screen is
I'm not actually positive it's a regression in gvfs. I've compiled the
natty version of gvfs, and that didn't help. In both cases I get:
gvfs-mount obex://[40:89:4E:71:40:E3]
Error mounting location: Connection to the device lost
The command takes a few seconds to complete, which makes me wonder
** Summary changed:
- regression in gvfs to connect using obex
+ regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858
Title:
regression
Weird, it looks like it gets an idle signal _right_ after login. We'll
have to do some more investigating.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889278
Title:
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert-enablement
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408903
Title:
Does not handle microphone mute button (KEY_MICMUTE)
Status in
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Invalid = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805136
Title:
accounts window doesn't fit on screen and no
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805136
Title:
accounts window doesn't fit on screen and no scrollbar to show hidden
fields
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808138
Title:
brasero fails to copy a data dvd, or audio cd.
Status in A
related to bug 908684
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889278
Title:
Screen is locked again after unsuspend and successful authentication
Status in OEM
That's odd, I just tried this on
thunderbird-9.0+build2-0ubuntu0.11.10.1 stock oneiric-updates and it had
a scroll bar.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805136
Title:
Okay, we have a regression in version 10, I think. I just tried
thunderbird-10.0+build1-0ubuntu0.11.10.1 and that failed, ie it doesn't
scroll the accounts window.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Florian Burger (mfg-burger) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
** Also affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: gnome-settings
Forgot to resize the window, this works on version 10 as well. Kent,
does the version in 12.04 still not work if you move the bottom of the
window up?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
After copying, a dialog box comes up that says
Please replace the disc with a writable CD or DVD
There is only a cancel button. Once a blank CD is inserted and detected,
it starts burning. This is with brasero version 3.2.0-0ubuntu1. Once the
CD was burned it played properly upon eject,
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605603
Title:
brasero can't use cdrdao to burn cd
Status in A
Does anyone know where you can get an ISO that doesn't line up on 32kb
boundaries? I just checked the ubuntu alternate install iso and at
705998848, it's a clean multiple of 32kb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero
This worked for me:
BraseroBurn: (at burn-checksum-image.c:531) BraseroChecksumImage Setting new che
cksum (type = 2) 5b920a4988ce60621131d58429ffa95f (5b920a4988ce60621131d58429ffa
95f before)
BraseroBurn: (at burn-job.c:1071) BraseroChecksumImage Finished track successful
ly
And the file is
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: Ursula Junque (ursinha) = James M. Leddy (jm-leddy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889278
Title:
Screen
If that is truely the case (I'll test) we should have gnome-settings do
no screen locking in conditions where (time_to_lock == time_to_poweroff)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
I tried 5 and 5 minutes, no dice. Perhaps it kicks in when lock screen
is _longer_ than the suspend setting. Iirc this kind of used to be the
case back in the day with xscreensaver, acpid would suspend your laptop
and then when you opened it up again you would see a screen, then when
xscreensaver
Hi Ursula,
Would you please take a look into this and let me know if you can find
out any more information?
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Medium = Critical
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ursula Junque (ursinha)
--
You received this bug
I just tried to reproduce on an Thinkpad X201s and was unable to do so.
This might be hardware dependent.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889278
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 880079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880079
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859321
bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in filter_type_func()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 880079
bluetooth-applet crashes when trying
Hi Ursinha,
Would you mind taking a look in to this? This still looks to be a
problem because the account settings dialog on my machine takes up
almost all the vertical real estate and I have a pretty generous
resolution compared to most laptops out there. It looks like there are
some patches in
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869799
Title:
[Dell inspiron M5110] no output
Hello James,
You mentioned that you're carrying patches to address these issues.
Would you please attach to the bug report?
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
Here is the error message:
Could not switch to the following configuration (timestamp 160860):
requested position/size for CRTC 148 is outside the allowed limit:
position=(1366, 0), size=(1366, 768), maximum=(1600, 1600)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Hi Tim,
The reason that this works when invoking xrandr manually is because it's
mirroring the display. By default when you plug it in, it tries to
extend the desktop to the other monitor. I've just learned (from
Sarvatt) that virtual desktop size is restricted to 1600x1600
(configurable through
quite similar to bug 873747. That report also states that 11.04 works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869799
Title:
[Dell inspiron M5110] no output
** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libgweather in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228554
Title:
no Asia/BeiJing option in TimeZone
Status
Think this patch is a bit better. If we define Beijing as a new time
zone, we lose a lot of information. However, since it is the same
timezone as Shanghai, we can just link the two.
** Patch added: beijing.diff
Marking invalid in linux because this was fixed in g-s-d.
** Changed in: linux
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539477
Marking invalid since this was filed against 11.10, and 11.10 eliminated
gnome-screensaver.
** Changed in: oem-priority/oneiric
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
There is yet another windows registry style place that this stuff is
stored? It took me a long time to find this bug report and finally fix
the problem.
We should contact the author of this article too because it's the best
I've seen and turns up in a lot of search results:
501 - 582 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
