On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:23:08PM -, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> As you suggested I created a bunch of transitional packages. That
> required that the Conficts fields in the corresponding hunspell-*
> packages and the hyphen-no package were replaced with Breaks/Replaces. I
> agree it's not
Thanks for your comments, Mattia.
I have considered it further, and created a new PPA, this time with lo-
dicts 1:5.1.0-1:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/lo-dicts4
This time I made use of the nifty debian/helper.py, and to start with I
made the version change which you already
So, I applied a version of the first point in git (with a different
version that is not invented), that should be enough.
For the second one: I'm not sure I like adding that in debian at all. It
shouldn't be necessary anyway (also considering that my evil plan includes
pushing for the removals
Hmm.. Time goes by, and lo-dicts 1:5.1.0-1 seems to be stuck in Debian's
new queue for some reason. One possibility is that we simply upload in
Ubuntu with a debian/control delta for now, to make reasonably updated
dictionaries available in 16.04. However, it would still be good if we
could agree
Well, lo-dicts builds a binary hunspell-sv containing both dictionaries.
the source hunspell-sv instead builds 2 binaries hunspell-sv-se and
myspell-sv-se. They probably conflicts, but one doesn't take the other
over automatically, no.
I'd be lovely see this done before xenial… Björn??
--
You
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice-dictionaries in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them)
Status in
Please, sync the latest with Debian and merge the changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice-dictionaries in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon
I'd love to see Björn Michaelsen do the initial merge (because I don't
think a sync is possible). After that I'll happily take care of the
subsequent uploads, but I don't have enough time to dedicate to the
first, big one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
are there any news on this?
would be nice to have this done for xenial, so we can drop conflicts and stuff
right after it, instead of keeping them for 2 more years.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice-dictionaries in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement
I just looked if we can do a direct sync, but stopped when I found that
Debian wasnt building hunspell-sv-se. I wouldnt merge if there is not
more to it, rather just readd those on top of Debian package ..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:52:11PM -, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> I just looked if we can do a direct sync, but stopped when I found that
> Debian wasnt building hunspell-sv-se. I wouldnt merge if there is not
> more to it, rather just readd those on top of Debian package ..
debian's lo-dicts
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice-dictionaries in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198
Title:
Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly
are there ubuntu changes that make sense to keep at all?
I see the most relevant delta is the bunch of .dictlistinfo installed in
$(CURDIR)/debian/$$pkg/usr/share/myspell/infos/ooo/$$pkg
that ttbomk are not used anymore nowadays.
as stated on #268953 I wanted to give a shoot at this now that
14 matches
Mail list logo
