[Expired for xorg (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
Kernel 4.4.21 LTS
The above-referenced kernel was released today. It may (might) resolve
the regression I have experienced that keeps me from using Ubuntu
16.04.1 (believed to be an i915 driver issue). To find out I need to try
the kernel in Ubuntu. If I install from an .iso (16.04.1) and select
You don't say whether there is any reason to believe there might have
been a change to address the regression that affects my system. Even
so, I will try to get to the store tomorrow and try the new kernel, as
you suggest, as soon as I can - maybe tomorrow evening. If it works for
me Iĺl let
RD, it is most helpful if your testing results are from Ubuntu
specifically (not derivatives, etc.).
To advise, Trusty with the original 3.13 kernel is fully supported as
outlined in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack . This
would also help here as you would have a working
Christopher:
I am glad to receive this; I thought my issue was dead because of my
inability to perform the requested bisections. I have switched to Mint
17.3 MATE because it still uses the 3.19 kernel and is supported until
2019. If I understand you correctly, your advice is that is that I
RD, to keep this relevant to upstream, please continue to test the
latest mainline kernel as they are released (newest is 4.8-rc3). Could
you please advise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
Support for kernel 4.2 would have been nice in the new release 14.04.5,
as it would have allowed those affected by this to still use an updated
version of 14.04 LTS...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
Christopher:
I have surveyed the pages you reference about how to perform bisects,
and determined 1) that I cannot invest the time required and 2) I do not
possess the technical ability required. My shortcomings are exacerbated
by the fact that to perform the series of tests needed I must have
I will try -- I won't have as much time to work on this the next few
days -- please be patient.
RD
On 07/11/2016 04:14 AM, Christopher M. Penalver wrote:
> RD, the next step is to fully commit bisect from kernel 4.2 to 4.4 in
> order to identify the last good kernel commit, followed
RD, the next step is to fully commit bisect from kernel 4.2 to 4.4 in
order to identify the last good kernel commit, followed immediately by
the first bad one. This will allow for a more expedited analysis of the
root cause of your issue. Could you please do this following
Thanks again for your interest. I can report that I tested upstream
kernel 4.7-6 as requested. And it did not resolve my issues. Due to the
fact that I am now using Mx-15 (Fusion), and I must install Ubuntu to
perform further testing, I will not be able to spare any more time in
these efforts. I
I saw no yellow circle, but:
kernel-bug-exists-upstream
kernel-bug-exists-upstream-4.7-rc6
RD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1599952
Title:
Blurred images with kernels
Thanks again for your interest. I can report that I tested upstream
kernel 4.7-6 as requested. And it did not resolve my issues. Due to the
fact that I am now using Mx-15 (Fusion), and I must install Ubuntu to
perform further testing, I will not be able to spare any more time in
these efforts.
RD, in order to allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue, at
your earliest convenience, could you please test the latest upstream kernel
available from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/?C=N;O=D ? Please
keep in mind the following:
1) The one to test is at the very
14 matches
Mail list logo
