On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:07PM -, William Pietri wrote:
> Aesthetically, making something vital (UI startup) depend on something
> decorative (splash screens) seems odd. Perhaps future versions of this
> can be made more robust.
To clarify, plymouth is not "merely decorative". It is the b
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:14:39AM -, Franck wrote:
> Just a question: what if the no-splash is passed as a boot option ?
That only controls whether you have a graphical splash, not whether the
plymouth-splash job runs.
> Or if plymouth is removed ?
That is absolutely unsupported.
--
You r
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:57:55AM -, Adam Bruce wrote:
> Apport won't let me report as it's not an official package
>
> I don't know if you can make use of the crash file itself?
>
> Otherwise let me know how I can report it to you
Thanks, yes I know how to unpack .crash files. The file co
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:13:39AM -, Adam Bruce wrote:
>
> It did not boot successfuly though and went to Low Graphics mode. There
> is a crash report if you want me to upload that as a report. But I don't
> know if it will just be the same as: bug 1130667 - let me know if you
> want me to po
All 5 boots produced a usable X session. I haven't had a problem booting up
successfully since the 1st. By cold boot I just mean a normal power on
after a normal power off. In actual fact I haven't had to do a hard reset
(or manually hold down the power button to power off and then power on
again),
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 06:39:55PM -, Mark Murphy wrote:
> I think I was a bit confused this morning!
>
> I've done a few cold boots and restarts since then, I've included them
> in the attached file. I included all the Xorg log files in the first
> directory. The first four directories in th
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 04:06:47PM -, Franck wrote:
> Build for amd64 running for 12 hours and an half, and ils still
> ongoing... ils that expected ??
Yes, unfortunately. PPA rebuilds are executed at the lowest priority,
and it's possible all the ARM virtualized builds for phone stuff may be
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:50:43AM -, Mark wrote:
> Hmmm, I was fairly sure I added the PPA, it's in my sources.list. I did
> another apt-get update and dist-upgrade this morning though and the Xorg
> build date didn't change, so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I can
> tarball up the Xorg.0.
Just looking at the dpkg log myself and noticed this:
2013-03-01 07:31:31 upgrade xserver-xorg-core:i386 2:1.13.2-0ubuntu2
2:1.13.2-0ubuntu3~lp982889~1
2013-03-01 07:31:31 status half-configured xserver-xorg-core:i386
2:1.13.2-0ubuntu2
2013-03-01 07:31:31 status unpacked xserver-xorg-core:i386 2:1
Hmmm, I was fairly sure I added the PPA, it's in my sources.list. I did
another apt-get update and dist-upgrade this morning though and the Xorg
build date didn't change, so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I can
tarball up the Xorg.0.logs as they are if you wish but I'm not sure if they
would be
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 04:34:00PM -, Franck wrote:
> I was quite sure I activated the PPA, and it failed. But looking at the
> version in Xorg.0.log, it seems I didn't get the right version. I did
> not pin any specific version... Looking at what is installed, I only
> have xerver-common comin
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:03:17AM -, Mark Murphy wrote:
> Installed PPA, rebooted, aok. Rebooted / Shutdown another couple of
> times to be sure, every restart successful. It looks like the PPA works
> for me, Raring Ringtail development branch with Intel GM965 graphics.
>
> ** Attachment add
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:03:17AM -, Mark Murphy wrote:
> Installed PPA, rebooted, aok. Rebooted / Shutdown another couple of
> times to be sure, every restart successful. It looks like the PPA works
> for me, Raring Ringtail development branch with Intel GM965 graphics.
>
> ** Attachment add
I just have a plain old hdd, no ssd.
On Feb 28, 2013 8:41 a.m., "Franck" wrote:
> Yes, SSD too here. but I guess this ain't extraordinary nowdays... Also
> this most probably has an impact, as it seems to be a race condiction...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscrib
Mine has an ssd too, ocz agility 3 120GB. Maybe loading certain parts of
the system too fast make this happen if there aren't any checks
On Feb 28, 2013 8:06 AM, "Jason Robinson" wrote:
> ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/982889/+
On 13 Feb 19, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Oh, and if you do run the PPA, I'd like to see your Xorg.0.log,
> regardless of whether it worked or not, so I can verify the error code
> being passed up.
Please find my Xorg.0.log and Xorg.0.log.old attached. I see Xorg win
sometimes (1 out of 5 reboots?).
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:18:25PM -, Tomas Vanderka wrote:
> I don't think the patch from #31 will fix this because X is really
> getting EACCESS (0xfff3) not EAGAIN as can be seen in #22
No it will; I don't check for EAGAIN specifically yet, but just a
non-zero return. I want to make it
17 matches
Mail list logo
