[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1973379] Re: "additional drivers" says we are using nvidia drivers but its not true

2022-07-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for software-properties (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973379

Title:
  "additional drivers" says we are using nvidia drivers but its not true

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  after selecting the recommended, tested nvidia driver, and restarting
  the system as suggested, no nvidia modules are loaded at all, instead
  just nouveau kernel modules are loaded and all the nvidia tools
  confirm that no nvidia drivers are being used and running.

  But starting the software properties and opening the "additional
  drivers" tab again, I'm being told the nvidia drivers are in selected
  and "1 proprietary driver in use".


  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: software-properties-gtk 0.99.22
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri May 13 23:20:12 2022
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-12 (760 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.10
  PackageArchitecture: all
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.4, python3-minimal, 
3.10.4-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.18-9
  SourcePackage: software-properties
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-04-28 (14 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1973379/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982493] Re: gnome-remote-desktop: Couldn't retrieve RDP username: Credentials not set - and more

2022-07-21 Thread Alex Murray
The security issue you refer to looks to have been assigned
CVE-2022-24882 which was fixed via
https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5461-1 more than a month ago. If
there is still a subsequent bug in gnome-remote-desktop / freerdp then
you should file a specific bug about that *and* mark it as public so the
appropriate Ubuntu developers can see it.

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-24882

** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Package changed: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) => freerdp2 (Ubuntu)

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to freerdp2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982493

Title:
  gnome-remote-desktop: Couldn't retrieve RDP username: Credentials not
  set - and more

Status in freerdp2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  An immediate upgrade to 2.7.0 appears to be critical both for
  functionality (cannot work without it and having the backported NTLM
  fixes) and security:

  Please see the following for details:
  
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1419705/gnome-remote-desktop-couldnt-retrieve-rdp-username-credentials-not-set-and

  The FreeRDP developers believe that Ubuntu has not backported the NTLM
  fixes from 2.7.0 to 2.6.1 and subsequently the reason for the failures
  users are experiencing.

  The easier / more clean path appears to be to upgrade to FreeRDP
  2.7.0.

  It seems to be related to this vulnerability bounty:
  https://vuldb.com/?id.198528

  See: 
  * https://www.freerdp.com/2022/04/25/2_7_0-release
  * https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/blob/2.7.0/ChangeLog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp2/+bug/1982493/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1972977] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in crocus_begin_query() from crocus_begin_query() from crocus_end_query() from crocus_end_query() from tc_call_end_query()

2022-07-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972977

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in crocus_begin_query() from
  crocus_begin_query() from crocus_end_query() from crocus_end_query()
  from tc_call_end_query()

Status in Mesa:
  Unknown
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-shell.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
42.0-2ubuntu1, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d8aa1211f7e8b219a4ee6dcae294ac16decd7fe3 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1972977/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982472] Re: Support A+N platform

2022-07-21 Thread jeremyszu
FWIK, there are many related packages need to modify together since it's
similar to an interface change.

It'll be more reasonable if we target to Jammy+.

The power-saving mode in Jammy is almost useless (but the nvidia-340, 390 may 
still need it).
However, the 'power-saving' mode apply:
```
"Section \"ServerLayout\"\n"
"Identifier \"layout\"\n"
"Option \"AllowNVIDIAGPUScreens\"\n"
"EndSection\n\n");
```
and disable nvidia driver.

If so, then I think we could say it's "non-nvidia" ("no-nvidia", etc..) instead 
of "intel" or "amd".
Which will more suitable when multiple graphic cards are attached.

Hi Alberto,

Have you any comment on this?

** Also affects: nvidia-settings (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-prime in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982472

Title:
  Support A+N platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-prime package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-settings package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The 'Power Saving Mode' of Nvidia app should change to ATI when the
  integrated graphic is Advanced Micro Devices.

  [Steps to reproduce]
  1. Install the OEM image
  2. Boot and log
  3. 'Dash' -> 'Nvidia Settings'
  4. Verify the 'PRIME Profiles'

  [Expected result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  AMD (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|AMD|on-demand|query

  [Actual result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  Intel (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|intel|on-demand|query

  [Failure rate]
  100%

  [Other Information]
  ubuntu 22.04
  nvidia-prime 0.8.17.1
  nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu1
  nvidia-driver 510.73.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1982472/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982472] Re: Support A+N platform

2022-07-21 Thread jeremyszu
** Tags added: jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-prime in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982472

Title:
  Support A+N platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in nvidia-prime package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The 'Power Saving Mode' of Nvidia app should change to ATI when the
  integrated graphic is Advanced Micro Devices.

  [Steps to reproduce]
  1. Install the OEM image
  2. Boot and log
  3. 'Dash' -> 'Nvidia Settings'
  4. Verify the 'PRIME Profiles'

  [Expected result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  AMD (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|AMD|on-demand|query

  [Actual result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  Intel (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|intel|on-demand|query

  [Failure rate]
  100%

  [Other Information]
  ubuntu 22.04
  nvidia-prime 0.8.17.1
  nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu1
  nvidia-driver 510.73.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1982472/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Huh, interesting. When I hover my cursor over the sound widgit in my top
panel bar, it says:

Output: 100%
0.00 dB
Built-in Audio Analog Stereo

And it says this even when I have something playing that ought to be
outputting sound.

Doesn't 0.00 db mean silence?

Reading this now to find out what I can:
https://sound.stackexchange.com/questions/25529/what-is-0-db-in-digital-
audio -- "So audio meters don't show the dBu, dBV or dBFS level of the
signal (some do, but as an extra). Instead they show 0dB as the standard
operating level of the system." Oddly fascinating read. I had no idea
that decibels were coined in relation to Bell labs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575912

Title:
  [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after
  fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Hardware sound device is available, according to:
  aplay -l
  sudo lspci

  
  https://help.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-help/sound-nosound.html

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: i386
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Wed Apr 27 22:06:16 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-24 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 
(20160420.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:Intel failed
  Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel
  Symptom_DevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  Symptom_Jack: Speaker, Internal
  Symptom_Type: No sound at all
  Title: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/12/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0703
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.board.version: x.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: x.x
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0703:bd04/12/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1001PXD:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1001PXD:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x:
  dmi.product.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.product.version: x.x
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1575912/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Re:^^^ Oh, and I have the soundcard: Realtek ALC269VB Analog, also.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575912

Title:
  [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after
  fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Hardware sound device is available, according to:
  aplay -l
  sudo lspci

  
  https://help.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-help/sound-nosound.html

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: i386
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Wed Apr 27 22:06:16 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-24 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 
(20160420.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:Intel failed
  Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel
  Symptom_DevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  Symptom_Jack: Speaker, Internal
  Symptom_Type: No sound at all
  Title: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/12/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0703
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.board.version: x.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: x.x
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0703:bd04/12/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1001PXD:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1001PXD:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x:
  dmi.product.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.product.version: x.x
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1575912/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Hi,

This sounds similar to my bug.

I am pretty sure my physical speakers work, and even that they worked
when I first installed Ubuntu Mate 22.04, but very shortly afterwards
they stopped working.

The headphone jack also doesn't work. I installed a jack-detection repo
and now sometimes (not constantly) the headphones will shoot out max
volume white noise.

Here is my Alsa info: http://alsa-
project.org/db/?f=608937f066095ec6710e5f3bafc292815da99414

I've been trying to fix this problem for a couple weeks now. I've
followed different blogs on similar topics and read through various
solutions to similar problems posted on launchpad or stackoverflow.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575912

Title:
  [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after
  fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Hardware sound device is available, according to:
  aplay -l
  sudo lspci

  
  https://help.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-help/sound-nosound.html

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: i386
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Wed Apr 27 22:06:16 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-24 (3 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 
(20160420.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:Intel failed
  Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel
  Symptom_DevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  student1739 F pulseaudio
  Symptom_Jack: Speaker, Internal
  Symptom_Type: No sound at all
  Title: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/12/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0703
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.board.version: x.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: x.x
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0703:bd04/12/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1001PXD:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1001PXD:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x:
  dmi.product.name: 1001PXD
  dmi.product.version: x.x
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1575912/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1968213] Re: Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
You can get the freerdp deb from
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp2/2.6.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu2.2/+build/23854758
, that's probably another issue due to the apt phasing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968213

Title:
  Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  I upgraded to the 22.04 beta last week from 21.10. I use a custom icon
  theme. Whenever I enter the Appearance tab in settings the icon theme
  is set back to Yaru.

  [ Test case(s) ]

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface gtk-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  User theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita is still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The icon theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface icon-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Icon theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita icon theme is
  still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. From Gedit settings, select an editor color scheme that is not Yaru
  or Yaru-dark.

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Gedit theme should not have changed

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Does not change the Gedit theme, unless a Yaru variant is selected as
   gedit color scheme.

  
  [ Regression Potential ]

  Theme is not updated to upgraders that use some unsupported custom themes.
  Theme selection doesn't work in some custom configurations.

  ---

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:41.4-1ubuntu9
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu80
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Apr  7 20:47:41 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-02-02 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 
(20211012)SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1968213/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981611] Re: conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package speech-dispatcher - 0.11.1-3ubuntu1

---
speech-dispatcher (0.11.1-3ubuntu1) kinetic; urgency=medium

  * debian/speech-dispatcher.maintscript:
- don't remove mary-generic.conf on upgrade, it's included in the
  package again. Fix conffile prompt on update (lp: #1981611)

 -- Sebastien Bacher   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:15:31
+0200

** Changed in: speech-dispatcher (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to speech-dispatcher in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981611

Title:
  conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

Status in speech-dispatcher package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in speech-dispatcher source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact 
  A conffile prompt is displayed on upgrade

  * Test Case
  upgrade speech-dispatcher from the focal to the jammy-proposed version, there 
should be no conffile prompt

  * Regression potential
  the change only remove a .mainscript line to remove the conffile, if the 
change was incorrect the prompt could still be there or a an old conffile could 
be not removed on upgrade

  -

  I was performing a distribution upgrade of an Ubuntu Desktop install
  of Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04 when I encountered a debconf prompt
  regarding a speech-dispatcher config file which I had not modified.
  From /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log:

  Setting up speech-dispatcher (0.11.1-1) ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/cicero.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/dtk-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/epos-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/festival.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/flite.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/llia_phon-generic.conf ...^M
  ^M
  Configuration file '/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf'^M
   ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation.^M
   ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.^M
     What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:^M
  Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version^M
  N or O  : keep your currently-installed version^M
    D : show the differences between the versions^M
    Z : start a shell to examine the situation^M
   The default action is to keep your current version.^M
  *** mary-generic.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? n^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/swift-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file /etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/pico-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ivona.conf ...^M
  speech-dispatcherd.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not 
starting it.^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/baratinoo.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ibmtts.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/kali.conf ...^M

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speech-dispatcher/+bug/1981611/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981611] Re: conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted speech-dispatcher into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speech-
dispatcher/0.11.1-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: speech-dispatcher (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to speech-dispatcher in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981611

Title:
  conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

Status in speech-dispatcher package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in speech-dispatcher source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact 
  A conffile prompt is displayed on upgrade

  * Test Case
  upgrade speech-dispatcher from the focal to the jammy-proposed version, there 
should be no conffile prompt

  * Regression potential
  the change only remove a .mainscript line to remove the conffile, if the 
change was incorrect the prompt could still be there or a an old conffile could 
be not removed on upgrade

  -

  I was performing a distribution upgrade of an Ubuntu Desktop install
  of Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04 when I encountered a debconf prompt
  regarding a speech-dispatcher config file which I had not modified.
  From /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log:

  Setting up speech-dispatcher (0.11.1-1) ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/cicero.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/dtk-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/epos-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/festival.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/flite.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/llia_phon-generic.conf ...^M
  ^M
  Configuration file '/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf'^M
   ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation.^M
   ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.^M
     What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:^M
  Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version^M
  N or O  : keep your currently-installed version^M
    D : show the differences between the versions^M
    Z : start a shell to examine the situation^M
   The default action is to keep your current version.^M
  *** mary-generic.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? n^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/swift-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file /etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/pico-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ivona.conf ...^M
  speech-dispatcherd.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not 
starting it.^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/baratinoo.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ibmtts.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/kali.conf ...^M

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1980836] Re: Regression in Ubuntu 22.04: Content of form field stored invisibly

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980836

Title:
  Regression in Ubuntu 22.04: Content of form field stored invisibly

Status in Poppler:
  Unknown
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in poppler package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Evince on Ubuntu 22.04 is not able to handle some PDF forms correctly
  anymore that it was able to handle on Ubuntu 21.10 and on Ubuntu
  20.04.

  The symptom is that one can edit the form content and also save it,
  but that the entered text is only visible when the form field is
  focused and in edit mode. Otherwise the text it is invisible, also on
  printouts.

  Such bugs have been reported against Evince for a long time (e.g.,
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/265033) but I
  am reporting this as a new bug because for the current form with which
  I am experiencing this it is a regression.

  I have attached the problematic form with two form fields filled out, one in 
the upper left corner and the big one in the lower half.
  I have produced this by taking the original, empty form (produced by somebody 
else) and first opened it in Evince 41.4, which I have installed from the snap 
package (revision 1017) on Ubuntu 22.04. I entered text in the upper left field 
and saved the form.
  Then I opened the PDF in Evince 42.3 from the apt package of Ubuntu 22.04 and 
entered text in the big field and saved the form.

  Evince 3.36 on Ubuntu 20.04 has the same (correct) behavior as Evince
  41.4.

  When I open the PDF again, only the text in the first field is
  visible. The text in the second field is visible only if I click into
  the field. The visibility of the field contents is the same for Evince
  41.4 (snap), Evince 42.3 (apt), and Okular 20.12.3 (snap). So it seems
  that the problem is with Evince 42.3 incorrectly saving the field
  content, not with displaying it.

  Firefox shows and prints the content of both fields, though.

  Note that I cannot switch back to Evince 41 because for some other
  forms that I have the exact same problem happens only with the old
  version and the new version fixes it. So it seems that something
  changed that fixed it for some forms and broke it for others.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: evince 42.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-40.43-generic 5.15.35
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jul  6 14:32:27 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-26 (222 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  Snap.Changes:
   ID   Status  Spawn  Bereit 
Zusammenfassung
   137  Done2022-07-06T12:48:33+02:00  2022-07-06T12:48:41+02:00  
Installiere "evince" Snap
  SourcePackage: evince
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-06-22 (13 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1980836/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982477] Re: UI does not work with Linux version 5.15.0-41

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Package changed: gdm3 (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982477

Title:
  UI does not work with Linux version 5.15.0-41

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After upgrading my Linux kernel to version 5.15.0-41, I am no longer
  able to get into the UI. After booting and unlocking the disk I end up
  on a black screen with a blinking underscore in the top left corner.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gdm3 42.0-1ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Thu Jul 21 12:14:04 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-03 (229 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: gdm3
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.gdm3.custom.conf: 2022-07-21T11:41:09.164904

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1982477/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982495] Re: distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Package changed: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982495

Title:
  distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Hi.

  It is happening again updating 5.15.0-42 LOWLATENCY, as
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966066

  Focusrite 2i2 2nd generation.

  Booting 5.13.0-52 LOWLATENCY solve, no distorted audio.

  Thx in advance, pleased to report more information about

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.13
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-42.45~20.04.1-lowlatency 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-42-lowlatency x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  alf1589 F jackdbus
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0c:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
   /dev/snd/seq:alf1717 F a2jmidid
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Thu Jul 21 17:17:29 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-02-05 (530 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 20.04.2 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210204)
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_Card: HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia
  Title: [USB-Audio - Scarlett 2i2 USB, playback] Pulseaudio fails to detect 
card
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/13/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 30.240
  dmi.bios.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.bios.version: V1.30
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: EasyNote TK85
  dmi.board.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.board.version: V1.30
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.chassis.version: V1.30
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPackardBell:bvrV1.30:bd08/13/2012:br30.240:svnPackardBell:pnEasyNoteTK85:pvrV1.30:rvnPackardBell:rnEasyNoteTK85:rvrV1.30:cvnPackardBell:ct10:cvrV1.30:skuCalpella_CRB:
  dmi.product.family: Intel_Mobile
  dmi.product.name: EasyNote TK85
  dmi.product.sku: Calpella_CRB
  dmi.product.version: V1.30
  dmi.sys.vendor: Packard Bell
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: 2022-07-21T16:49:41.895417

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1982495/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982495] Re: distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency

2022-07-21 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu => pulseaudio (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982495

Title:
  distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi.

  It is happening again updating 5.15.0-42 LOWLATENCY, as
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966066

  Focusrite 2i2 2nd generation.

  Booting 5.13.0-52 LOWLATENCY solve, no distorted audio.

  Thx in advance, pleased to report more information about

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.13
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-42.45~20.04.1-lowlatency 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-42-lowlatency x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  alf1589 F jackdbus
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0c:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
   /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
   /dev/snd/seq:alf1717 F a2jmidid
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Thu Jul 21 17:17:29 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-02-05 (530 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 20.04.2 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210204)
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_Card: HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia
  Title: [USB-Audio - Scarlett 2i2 USB, playback] Pulseaudio fails to detect 
card
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/13/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 30.240
  dmi.bios.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.bios.version: V1.30
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: EasyNote TK85
  dmi.board.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.board.version: V1.30
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Packard Bell
  dmi.chassis.version: V1.30
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPackardBell:bvrV1.30:bd08/13/2012:br30.240:svnPackardBell:pnEasyNoteTK85:pvrV1.30:rvnPackardBell:rnEasyNoteTK85:rvrV1.30:cvnPackardBell:ct10:cvrV1.30:skuCalpella_CRB:
  dmi.product.family: Intel_Mobile
  dmi.product.name: EasyNote TK85
  dmi.product.sku: Calpella_CRB
  dmi.product.version: V1.30
  dmi.sys.vendor: Packard Bell
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: 2022-07-21T16:49:41.895417

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1982495/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982495] [NEW] distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency

2022-07-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

Hi.

It is happening again updating 5.15.0-42 LOWLATENCY, as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966066

Focusrite 2i2 2nd generation.

Booting 5.13.0-52 LOWLATENCY solve, no distorted audio.

Thx in advance, pleased to report more information about

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-42.45~20.04.1-lowlatency 5.15.39
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-42-lowlatency x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  alf1589 F jackdbus
 /dev/snd/pcmC1D0c:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
 /dev/snd/pcmC1D0p:   alf1589 F...m jackdbus
 /dev/snd/seq:alf1717 F a2jmidid
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Thu Jul 21 17:17:29 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-02-05 (530 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 20.04.2 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210204)
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
Symptom: audio
Symptom_Card: HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia
Title: [USB-Audio - Scarlett 2i2 USB, playback] Pulseaudio fails to detect card
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/13/2012
dmi.bios.release: 30.240
dmi.bios.vendor: Packard Bell
dmi.bios.version: V1.30
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: EasyNote TK85
dmi.board.vendor: Packard Bell
dmi.board.version: V1.30
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Packard Bell
dmi.chassis.version: V1.30
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPackardBell:bvrV1.30:bd08/13/2012:br30.240:svnPackardBell:pnEasyNoteTK85:pvrV1.30:rvnPackardBell:rnEasyNoteTK85:rvrV1.30:cvnPackardBell:ct10:cvrV1.30:skuCalpella_CRB:
dmi.product.family: Intel_Mobile
dmi.product.name: EasyNote TK85
dmi.product.sku: Calpella_CRB
dmi.product.version: V1.30
dmi.sys.vendor: Packard Bell
modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: 2022-07-21T16:49:41.895417

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal
-- 
distorted audio after update 5.15.0-42-lowlatency
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop 
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981966] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Correct, it is suppose to be replaced by 7.4.0~rc2 next week.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981966

Title:
   [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is in its fifth bugfix release of the 7.3 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.5_release

   * Version 7.3.4 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.3.4 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.5 
(that's a total of 83 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1797/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220719_091411_74233@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220719_110142_388ca@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220719_082728_0b9aa@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220719_080609_7c067@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A minor release with a total of 83 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1981966/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981881] Re: Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

2022-07-21 Thread Olivier Tilloy
How do you enable a guest account in Xubuntu?
I just installed xubuntu 22.04 in a VM and I can't see the option on the login 
screen.

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981881

Title:
  Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  My laptop is sometimes used by visitors. They want to browse the
  internet. So I setup the guest-account. I found out that the Firefox
  snap is broken on guest-accounts.

  When opening Firefox nothing happens. When starting FF from the
  command line of the guest-account I found out the following:

  $ firefox
  2022/07/12 00:46:01.906615 tool_linux.go:82: cannot open snapd info file 
“/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info”: open 
/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info: permission denied

  Version information:
  Guest Account on Xubuntu 22.04 (Jammy)
  FF version: 102.0.1 (64-bit)
  Mozilla Firefox Snap for Ubuntu canonical-002-1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1981881/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981611] Re: conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: speech-dispatcher (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Description changed:

+ * Impact 
+ A conffile prompt is displayed on upgrade
+ 
+ * Test Case
+ upgrade speech-dispatcher from the focal to the jammy-proposed version, there 
should be no conffile prompt
+ 
+ * Regression potential
+ the change only remove a .mainscript line to remove the conffile, if the 
change was incorrect the prompt could still be there or a an old conffile could 
be not removed on upgrade
+ 
+ -
+ 
  I was performing a distribution upgrade of an Ubuntu Desktop install of
  Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04 when I encountered a debconf prompt
  regarding a speech-dispatcher config file which I had not modified. From
  /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log:
  
  Setting up speech-dispatcher (0.11.1-1) ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/cicero.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/dtk-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/epos-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng-mbrola-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-ng.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/festival.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/flite.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/llia_phon-generic.conf ...^M
  ^M
  Configuration file '/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf'^M
-  ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation.^M
-  ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.^M
-What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:^M
- Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version^M
- N or O  : keep your currently-installed version^M
-   D : show the differences between the versions^M
-   Z : start a shell to examine the situation^M
-  The default action is to keep your current version.^M
+  ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation.^M
+  ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.^M
+    What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:^M
+ Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version^M
+ N or O  : keep your currently-installed version^M
+   D : show the differences between the versions^M
+   Z : start a shell to examine the situation^M
+  The default action is to keep your current version.^M
  *** mary-generic.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? n^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/swift-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file /etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/espeak-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/pico-generic.conf 
...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ivona.conf ...^M
  speech-dispatcherd.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not 
starting it.^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/baratinoo.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/ibmtts.conf ...^M
  Removing obsolete conffile /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/kali.conf ...^M

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to speech-dispatcher in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981611

Title:
  conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

Status in speech-dispatcher package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact 
  A conffile prompt is displayed on upgrade

  * Test Case
  upgrade speech-dispatcher from the focal to the jammy-proposed version, there 
should be no conffile prompt

  * Regression potential
  the change only remove a .mainscript line to remove the conffile, if the 
change was incorrect the prompt could still be there or a an old conffile could 
be not removed on upgrade

  -

  I was performing a distribution upgrade of an Ubuntu Desktop install
  of Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04 when I encountered a debconf prompt
  regarding a speech-dispatcher config file which I had not modified.
  From /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log:

  Setting up speech-dispatcher (0.11.1-1) ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/cicero.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 
/etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/dtk-generic.conf ...^M
  Installing new version of config file 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981966] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libreoffice into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.5-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981966

Title:
   [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is in its fifth bugfix release of the 7.3 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.5_release

   * Version 7.3.4 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.3.4 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.5 
(that's a total of 83 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1797/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220719_091411_74233@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220719_110142_388ca@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220719_082728_0b9aa@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220719_080609_7c067@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A minor release with a total of 83 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1981966/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1968213] Re: Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

2022-07-21 Thread Karol
Hi Łukasz,

For some reason I am unable to install the update. It was kept back,
when I ran `sudo apt upgrade` and when I try to explicitly install it I
get this:

karol@kolatek ~ $ sudo apt list --upgradable
Listing... Done
gnome-control-center/jammy-proposed 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 amd64 [upgradable 
from: 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
N: There are 3 additional versions. Please use the '-a' switch to see them.
karol@kolatek ~ $ sudo apt install gnome-control-center
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libfreerdp-server2-2 : Depends: libfreerdp2-2 (= 2.6.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu2.1) but 
2.6.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu2.2 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
karol@kolatek ~ $

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968213

Title:
  Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  I upgraded to the 22.04 beta last week from 21.10. I use a custom icon
  theme. Whenever I enter the Appearance tab in settings the icon theme
  is set back to Yaru.

  [ Test case(s) ]

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface gtk-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  User theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita is still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The icon theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface icon-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Icon theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita icon theme is
  still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. From Gedit settings, select an editor color scheme that is not Yaru
  or Yaru-dark.

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Gedit theme should not have changed

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Does not change the Gedit theme, unless a Yaru variant is selected as
   gedit color scheme.

  
  [ Regression Potential ]

  Theme is not updated to upgraders that use some unsupported custom themes.
  Theme selection doesn't work in some custom configurations.

  ---

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:41.4-1ubuntu9
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu80
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Apr  7 20:47:41 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-02-02 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 
(20211012)SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1968213/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1970449] Re: GPG keys are not shown in Software and Updates

2022-07-21 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Importance: Low
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Tags added: fr-2565

** Tags removed: fr-2565 rls-jj-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970449

Title:
  GPG keys are not shown in Software and Updates

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in software-properties source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in software-properties source package in Kinetic:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  software-properties-gtk does not show the registered apt gpg keys in
  the "Authentication" tab on my Ubuntu 21.10 and 22.04 systems.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Apr 26 20:48:04 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-25 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1970449/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981966] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I see kinetic is still on rc2, but I suppose this is only temporary.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981966

Title:
   [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is in its fifth bugfix release of the 7.3 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.5_release

   * Version 7.3.4 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.3.4 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.5 
(that's a total of 83 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1797/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220719_091411_74233@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220719_110142_388ca@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220719_082728_0b9aa@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220719_080609_7c067@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A minor release with a total of 83 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1981966/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982494] [NEW] package libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/crocus_dri.so' before installing

2022-07-21 Thread fake
Public bug reported:

Errors were encountered while processing:
 /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-LWXYKW/08-libgl1-mesa-dri_22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./casper/filesystem.squashfs
CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
CasperVersion: 1.470
CompositorRunning: None
Date: Thu Jul 21 15:12:11 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ErrorMessage: unable to make backup link of 
'./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/crocus_dri.so' before installing new version: 
Input/output error
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo HD Graphics 620 [17aa:39f1]
   Subsystem: Lenovo GM108M [GeForce 940MX] [17aa:39f1]
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
MachineType: LENOVO 80SV
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.4, python3-minimal, 
3.10.4-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
 apt  2.4.5
SourcePackage: mesa
Title: package libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/crocus_dri.so' 
before installing new version: Input/output error
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/10/2016
dmi.bios.release: 1.23
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 3JCN23WW
dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: Torronto 5C1
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: NO DPK
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ideapad 510-15IKB
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.23
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr3JCN23WW:bd11/10/2016:br1.23:efr1.23:svnLENOVO:pn80SV:pvrLenovoideapad510-15IKB:rvnLENOVO:rnTorronto5C1:rvrNODPK:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoideapad510-15IKB:skuLENOVO_MT_80SV_BU_idea_FM_Lenovoideapad510-15IKB:
dmi.product.family: IDEAPAD
dmi.product.name: 80SV
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_80SV_BU_idea_FM_Lenovo ideapad 510-15IKB
dmi.product.version: Lenovo ideapad 510-15IKB
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2build3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982494

Title:
  package libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
  gnu/dri/crocus_dri.so' before installing new version: Input/output
  error

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-LWXYKW/08-libgl1-mesa-dri_22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./casper/filesystem.squashfs
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CasperVersion: 1.470
  CompositorRunning: None
  Date: Thu Jul 21 15:12:11 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ErrorMessage: unable to make backup link of 
'./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/crocus_dri.so' before installing new version: 
Input/output error
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo HD Graphics 620 [17aa:39f1]
 Subsystem: Lenovo GM108M [GeForce 940MX] [17aa:39f1]
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
  MachineType: LENOVO 80SV
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz 
file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981109] Re: server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in every container

2022-07-21 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109

Title:
  server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in
  every container

Status in fwupd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in modemmanager package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Looking at memory utilization in a pristine Ubuntu lxd container (top
  -o RES), I see that ModemManager is running, which I was surprised to
  see is present at all in the stock image.

  Tracking this I find that fwupd depends on libmm-glib0, which in turn
  Recommends: modemmanager.

  Libraries in general should not recommend daemons, so it's possible
  this should be fixed by libmm-glib0 dropping this Recommends.  It
  certainly doesn't seem to be a deliberate decision by the Server Team
  to have modemmanager installed and running by default on all systems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1981109/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981881] Re: Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
It was also recently discussed  on https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/known-
issues-with-firefox-snap/24663/88

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981881

Title:
  Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My laptop is sometimes used by visitors. They want to browse the
  internet. So I setup the guest-account. I found out that the Firefox
  snap is broken on guest-accounts.

  When opening Firefox nothing happens. When starting FF from the
  command line of the guest-account I found out the following:

  $ firefox
  2022/07/12 00:46:01.906615 tool_linux.go:82: cannot open snapd info file 
“/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info”: open 
/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info: permission denied

  Version information:
  Guest Account on Xubuntu 22.04 (Jammy)
  FF version: 102.0.1 (64-bit)
  Mozilla Firefox Snap for Ubuntu canonical-002-1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1981881/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981881] Re: Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

2022-07-21 Thread Olivier Tilloy
That looks like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757195.

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1757195
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757195

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981881

Title:
  Firefox snap broken in Guest Account

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My laptop is sometimes used by visitors. They want to browse the
  internet. So I setup the guest-account. I found out that the Firefox
  snap is broken on guest-accounts.

  When opening Firefox nothing happens. When starting FF from the
  command line of the guest-account I found out the following:

  $ firefox
  2022/07/12 00:46:01.906615 tool_linux.go:82: cannot open snapd info file 
“/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info”: open 
/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/snapd/info: permission denied

  Version information:
  Guest Account on Xubuntu 22.04 (Jammy)
  FF version: 102.0.1 (64-bit)
  Mozilla Firefox Snap for Ubuntu canonical-002-1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1981881/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969303] Re: "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

2022-07-21 Thread Robert Spencer
Test run:

 * With old version (41.5), under "install" tab attempted to uninstall package 
"0ad"
 * Error message "no package to remove" given
 * Ran `which 0ad` which exited with return code 0

 * Installed proposed package (41.5-2ubuntu2)
 * Rebooted machine

 * Under "install" tab attempted to uninstall package "0ad"
 * Prompted for confirmation and password
 * Application removed from list of installed packages
 * `which 0ad` exits with error code 1 (command non-existent or not executable)
 * `apt list 0ad` not showing `[installed]` or `[auto]` or `[manual]`.

 * Install application "2048" (source deb)
 * Removed application "2048"

 * Attempt to locate a package with a snap source **failed**
 * Attempt to remove package with a snap source **failed** (no packages listed 
with snap sources, including some I know I installed previously).

 * Downgraded gnome-software and gnome-software-common to 41.5-2

 * Attempt to locate a package with a snap source **failed**
 * Attempt to remove package with a snap source **failed** (no packages listed 
with snap sources, including some I know I installed previously).

Unfortunately, I did not check if I could uninstall snaps before doing
the upgrade. However, there are snaps installed that I must have done
through gnome-software, that I can now no longer see or remove.

As such, I cannot in good faith tag this verification-done-jammy.
However, the bug mentioned is passed so I'm not sure if I should label
it verification-failed-jammy.

I'd suggest future testers check explicitly that they can see, install
and remove snap packages before and after the upgrade, and wouldn't mind
if someone verifies this for me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969303

Title:
  "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

Status in GNOME Software:
  Fix Released
Status in snap-store-desktop:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The Ubuntu repository version of gnome-software in 22.04 does not
 allow a user to uninstall an application.
 For new users this could be be construed as disconcerting
 allowing only installing apps without the ability to
 remove those apps later if required.
 
 This SRU is applicable only to the gnome-software application
 installed from the repository and not the branded 
 ubuntu-store snap that is the default in Ubuntu (but not in 
 flavours such as Ubuntu Budgie)
 
 This fix for gnome-software has been backported from the
 v41 version of ubuntu's snap-store.
 
 The fixed software now checks for the status of a deb package
 installed - either manually installed or automatically as
 part of a distro install.  Previously this check was not done
 and gnome-software defaulted to not allowing the package to
 be uninstalled.
 The new status check allows gnome-software to evaluate that
 the package can be uninstalled.

  [Test Plan]

   * Choose a package from the installed list in gnome-software.
 Click the trash icon.  Note the error message that the package
 cannot be removed.
   * install gnome-software from the proposed repository. Logout and
 login.
 Repeat the trash icon click step above.  This time the package
 can be removed.  Confirm via either your distro menu or searching in
 GNOME Overview (if you are using gnome-software from the repository) that 
the
 application has been successfully removed.

   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the 
repository
 (change the source to "Ubuntu (deb)") and then deleting the application.
 
   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the snap
 repository (change the source to "Snap") and then deleting the application.

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The code changed is specific to 'packagekit' repos i.e. debian based repos.
 Thus it is sensitive to possible regressions when installing & removing 
apps.
 
   * The patch itself is well tested since it was backported to the ubuntu 
snap-store
 several weeks ago and has been rolled out.  No adverse issues has been 
reported.
 
   * The risk would be that there could be additional changes to the snap-store
 that was not incorporated in gnome-software possibly producing different
 results.
 
   * The additional regression tests in the Test Plan will reveal this.

  
  [Other Info]
   
   * There is no need to backport this to Kinetic since a revised version
 of the patch has been upstreamed (GNOME Team) and is in the kinetic 
version.


  

  
  On a fresh install of Ubuntu 22.04, ubuntu-store won't uninstall any 
application

  If you want to uninstall a software, there is 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982340] Re: Clients of the WebExtensions portal see the FDs as closed when the portal is used for the first time

2022-07-21 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Successfully tested xdg-desktop-portal 1.14.4-1ubuntu2~22.04.1 from
jammy-proposed using the test plan in the bug description, in a clean
and up-to-date jammy amd64 VM.

I first reproduced the problem without the update from jammy-proposed,
then installed the updated xdg-desktop-portal and reverted to a pristine
state by deleting ~/.local/share/flatpak/db/webextensions and
~/snap/firefox, and rebooting the machine. After enabling the chrome-
gnome-shell extension, it worked OOTB without the need to restart the
portal.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-desktop-portal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982340

Title:
  Clients of the WebExtensions portal see the FDs as closed when the
  portal is used for the first time

Status in xdg-desktop-portal package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xdg-desktop-portal source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Without this patch, the WebExtensions portal won't allow native
  connectors to communicate with a browser the first time they are
  spawned by the portal. Closing and restarting the browser won't do,
  only killing the portal and letting it restart.

   * This patch is being backported to jammy as this is currently the
  primary target for the effort of enabling native messaging in the
  firefox snap (not widely available yet, but the portal is available in
  jammy, and once the firefox implementation lands in the snap, we want
  this to work seamlessly).

   * The patch is trivial, it adds a missing variable initialization,
  which fixes the problem.

  
  [Test Plan]

   * Steps to reproduce the bug:
 - in a fully up-to-date jammy VM, install the chrome-gnome-shell package, 
and download and side-load the latest test snap from 
https://launchpad.net/~osomon/+snap/firefox-native-messaging (because the 
firefox implementation hasn't landed upstream yet)
 - if it exists, delete ~/.local/share/flatpak/db/webextensions and reboot 
to ensure a pristine state
 - run the firefox snap, browse to 
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/gnome-shell-integration/, and click 
the "Add to Firefox" blue button
 - accept the firefox prompt to install the extension
 - you will soon be prompted by GNOME Shell (with a modal dialog) to allow 
firefox to use the WebExtensions portal to start the native connector, click 
"Allow"
 - browse to https://extensions.gnome.org/local/
 - without the patch, you'll get a message that "an unexpected error 
occurred"
 - with the patch, firefox is able to talk to the native connector and 
displays a page with the currently installed GNOME Shell extensions

   * Note that this can also be tested with another extension that uses
  native messaging to talk to a native connector on the system, e.g.
  https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc-browser

  
  [Where problems could occur]

   * The patch is trivial and it's hard to imagine that initializing an
  uninitialized variable could have undesirable side effects.

   * In any case, the WebExtensions portal isn't currently used by any
  piece of software (this is being tested for firefox but isn't merged
  and therefore not widely available yet), so possible side effects
  wouldn't be noticed until the native messaging portal support lands in
  the firefox snap (see
  https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D140803).

  
  [Other Info]
   
   * We are still hoping to get the native messaging portal support in the 
firefox snap in time for Ubuntu 22.04.1, so for it to be a seamless experience 
this patch needs to land for the .1 release too.

  
  [Original Description]

  (this was initially reported here: https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-
  desktop-portal/pull/705#issuecomment-1123392120)

  When testing the WebExtensions portal against the only known client so
  far (firefox snap + the corresponding upstream patch
  https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D140803), I'm consistently
  seeing the following problem: the first time the user is prompted for
  authorization and accepts, the portal will spawn the native connector
  and pass the file descriptors to the client (firefox snap), but the
  client sees the file descriptors as closed. Closing the client and re-
  opening it doesn't help. Only when the portal is terminated and
  restarted does communication through FDs start working normally.

  It turns out this is caused by a missing variable initialization,
  which is trivially fixed by https://github.com/jhenstridge/xdg-
  desktop-portal/pull/2.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xdg-desktop-portal 1.14.4-1ubuntu1~22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl icp
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1971608] Re: Firefox PDF font rendering is often messed up

2022-07-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The issue is being discussed on https://github.com/ubuntu/gnome-
sdk/issues/49 now, one workaround is to do

$ mkdir ~/snap/firefox/current/.config/fontconfig/conf.d; cp
/etc/fonts/conf.d/* ~/snap/firefox/current/.config/fontconfig/conf.d

** Bug watch added: github.com/ubuntu/gnome-sdk/issues #49
   https://github.com/ubuntu/gnome-sdk/issues/49

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971608

Title:
  Firefox PDF font rendering is often messed up

Status in Mozilla Firefox:
  Confirmed
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I don't know whether it is an ubuntu bug or a firefox bug but since I
  am running the mozilla-supported ubuntu snap of firefox 99.0.1 (on
  22.04 jammy) (firefox 100 not yet available on snap), posting it here.

  Many pdfs have messed-up fonts on this firefox. Following a reddit
  thread, I tried disabling browser.display.use_document_fonts in
  about:config. Then the pdfs render correctly, but html webpages have
  messed-up fonts.

  Reddit post with screenshots and sample URL here; previous reddit thread 
linked therein. 
  
https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/uhz6d1/continued_messedup_font_rendering_in_firefox_pdf/

  Others (on this and previous thread) report it doesn't happen on other
  platforms. On this thread, someone confirms it on a Ubuntu VM, and
  someone else says it doesn't happen on Mint (based on Ubuntu but I
  think doesn't use snaps).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1971608/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 387957] Re: Improve Save As Dialog Box (focus issues)

2022-07-21 Thread schuko24
The file-chooser dialog as descripted in comment No. 43 bothers me since
I updated to Jammy.

It's not the state of art and workflow. Glad I found this place to
urgently beg for a change. I will try the solutions offered in comments
41 and 42.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387957

Title:
  Improve Save As Dialog Box (focus issues)

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Invalid
Status in gtk+2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The save dialog box has the irritating habit of not focusing on the
  file name area once I have browsed to the location where I would like
  to save my document. This is done better in Windows.

  There are two main scenarios when saving a document where this
  behaviour annoys:

  Scanario 1 - Browsing to save location by double-clicking:  
  1. File -> Save As (to bring up the "Save" dialog box). 
  2. Double click on the folder in which you would like to save the document. 
  3. Notice that the focus is now in the folder list area, not on the file name 
area. 
  4. I now have to click in the file name area to be able to name my document. 

  In Windows, the focus is returned immediately to the file name box
  once a folder is double clicked, so the name can be typed and the
  document saved in one step.

  Scenario 2 - Browsing save location using the keyboard (find as you type):
  1. File -> Save As (to bring up the "Save" dialog box). 
  2. Click on the folder area so that folder names can be typed to find them. 
Hit enter to enter desired folder. 
  3. Within the folder, step 2 can be repeated for subfolders indefinitely. 
  4. Once the desired location has been reached, the user must use the mouse 
click in the file name area to name the file before saving. 

  In Windows, when using find as you type, although focus is retained by
  the folder area when entering a lower folder level (so that you can
  browse to another level using the keyboard if desired), jumping to the
  file name box is simply a matter of pressing tab ONCE. In Ubuntu, I
  have to reverse tab (shift-tab) around 10 times to get back to the
  file name box at the top of the screen, or use the mouse - most
  annoying.

  Solutions (copy the Windows behaviour): 
  1. If a folder is double clicked with the mouse, the focus should jump back 
to the file name box. 
  2. If a folder is entered into by pressing enter (on the keyboard), focus 
should remain in the folder area, but the file name box should only be a single 
tab away. 

  I understand that solution 2 is problematic in that tabbing would
  ordinarily jump to the next element (usually the "file type"
  dropdown), not back to the top of the screen.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/387957/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1248174] Re: Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

2022-07-21 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
I no longer use Ubuntu. You will need to check it out yourself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248174

Title:
  Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Triaged
Status in Inkscape:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Daemon:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Extra Information:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments System:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Viewer:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Web Gallery:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-community:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Community Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Desktop Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in gimp package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in inkscape package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
  HOW TO REPRODUCE
  

  1. In Inkscape create a figure colored "Accent Orange", from the "Ubuntu" 
colour palette.
  2. Compare colour with "Ubuntu Orange" in 
http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette.

  **
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour to be the same.

  **
  REAL BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour is different.
  - The colours listed in the palette from Inkscape have no relationship with 
the ones in design.ubuntu.com.

  ***
  WORK-AROUND
  ***

  - To use the colours in http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette
  instead.

  
  RELEVANT DETAILS
  

  - Orange colour is very similar, but not equal. So it's very probable someone 
use the wrong colour in their designs for Ubuntu.
  - In fact, the logo of "Ubuntu" project in Launchpad is affected 
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu).
  - A demonstrative image is attached to this bug.

  **
  TECHNICAL INFO
  **

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: inkscape 0.48.4-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
  Uname: Linux 3.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Nov  5 13:47:52 2013
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-21 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: inkscape
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-18 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1248174/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1977663] Re: Remote Control under Remote Desktop sharing option only works for VNC

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-control-center into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977663

Title:
  Remote Control under Remote Desktop sharing option only works for VNC

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  Toggling "Remote Control" doesn't apply the value to the RDP service

  [ Test case 1]
  0. Install the updated gnome-control-center packages.
  1. Open the Settings app
  2. In the left sidebar, choose Sharing.
  3. Turn on sharing in the top bar of the app the click Remote Desktop
  4. Turn on Remote Desktop
  5. Turn on "Enable Legacy VNC Protocol"
  6. Turn on Remote Control
  7. Open a terminal and run
  grdctl status

  View-only: No and Status: enabled should show for both RDP and VNC.

  [ Test case 2]
  Complete Test Case 1. Then
  From a second computer, connect to the first computer using Remmina.

  The Remote Desktop page on the first computer provides the username
  and password to use. Just use the first computer's IP address.

  So something like:
  RDP jeremy@192.168.1.1

  Ensure that the RDP connection works and that you can remotely control
  the first computer from the second computer.

  Disconnect.
  Then reconnect but switch the protocol in Remmina to VNC

  So something like:
  VNC jeremy@192.168.1.1

  Ensure that the VNC connection works and that you can remotely control
  the first computer from the second computer.

  [ Regression Potential ]

  Remote control setting does not work for VNC, changing settings
  manually from gsettings isn't immediately reflected by the UI.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1977663/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1968213] Re: Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Karol, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-control-center into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968213

Title:
  Icon theme reverts to Yaru when entering Appearance settings

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  I upgraded to the 22.04 beta last week from 21.10. I use a custom icon
  theme. Whenever I enter the Appearance tab in settings the icon theme
  is set back to Yaru.

  [ Test case(s) ]

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface gtk-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  User theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita is still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The icon theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. Run
 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface icon-theme Adwaita

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Icon theme settings should have not changed (Adwaita icon theme is
  still in use)

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Interface and icon themes are matching the selected variant / accent.

  Note: The theme is still reset if changed externally while the
  appearance panel is open.

  --

  1. From Gedit settings, select an editor color scheme that is not Yaru
  or Yaru-dark.

  2. Start Settings Appearance panel:
 gnome-control-center ubuntu

  Gedit theme should not have changed

  3. Select a Dark/Light variant OR a Color in the Appearance panel:
 - Does not change the Gedit theme, unless a Yaru variant is selected as
   gedit color scheme.

  
  [ Regression Potential ]

  Theme is not updated to upgraders that use some unsupported custom themes.
  Theme selection doesn't work in some custom configurations.

  ---

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:41.4-1ubuntu9
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu80
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Apr  7 20:47:41 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-02-02 (64 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 
(20211012)SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1968213/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1980606] Please test proposed package

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello David, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-control-center into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980606

Title:
  gnome-control-centre crashes after enabling "Sharing"

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  gnome-control-center uses gsettings schemas from the gnome-remote-desktop 
package without being able to handle if those schemas are not installed.

  Because gnome-control-center keeps track of which page was last
  opened, it's not possible to simply ignore the Sharing page, a user
  would need to manually open the Settings app to a different page or
  else the Settings app won't run at all.

  ubuntu-desktop and gnome-shell already Recommend gnome-remote-desktop
  so most people won't experience this issue.

  Test Case
  -
  sudo apt remove gnome-remote-desktop
  Run gnome-control-center
  From the left sidebar, click Sharing
  (The app crashes)
  Install the update. The update will install gnome-remote-desktop.
  Run gnome-control-center
  The app should work like normal

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  This only adds a hard dependency on gnome-remote-desktop.

  Without this fix, the Sharing panel didn't work at all.

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  After the crash, gnome-control-centre fails to launch again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-40.43-generic 5.15.35
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Jul  3 20:39:04 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-24 (1866 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-05-31 (33 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1980606/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1980606] Re: gnome-control-centre crashes after enabling "Sharing"

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
It's hard for me to check: is this already released for kinetic? Since
the bug status says Fix Committed there.

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980606

Title:
  gnome-control-centre crashes after enabling "Sharing"

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in gnome-control-center source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  gnome-control-center uses gsettings schemas from the gnome-remote-desktop 
package without being able to handle if those schemas are not installed.

  Because gnome-control-center keeps track of which page was last
  opened, it's not possible to simply ignore the Sharing page, a user
  would need to manually open the Settings app to a different page or
  else the Settings app won't run at all.

  ubuntu-desktop and gnome-shell already Recommend gnome-remote-desktop
  so most people won't experience this issue.

  Test Case
  -
  sudo apt remove gnome-remote-desktop
  Run gnome-control-center
  From the left sidebar, click Sharing
  (The app crashes)
  Install the update. The update will install gnome-remote-desktop.
  Run gnome-control-center
  The app should work like normal

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  This only adds a hard dependency on gnome-remote-desktop.

  Without this fix, the Sharing panel didn't work at all.

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  After the crash, gnome-control-centre fails to launch again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-40.43-generic 5.15.35
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sun Jul  3 20:39:04 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-24 (1866 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-05-31 (33 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1980606/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982343] Re: Cannot parse policy entries with unsupported types

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982343

Title:
  Cannot parse policy entries with unsupported types

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Policies with unsupported types are currently unable to be parsed.
  Even if Ubuntu doesn't support these types we should still be able to
  parse the Microsoft ones - otherwise we are unable to apply any of the
  GPOs.

  This is a common occurence on Microsoft's policies like the Default
  Domain Policy. Even if Ubuntu supports a limited subset of types, we
  must still be able to parse all of them in case a Group Policy has
  both Ubuntu and non-Ubuntu entries.

  [Test Plan]

   * Attempt to apply the Default Domain Policy on a client

  [Where problems could occur]

  Adsys already excluded non-Ubuntu keys before applying policies, so
  this change has no impact other than letting all policies be parsed.
  If an error occurs in parsing an Ubuntu entry, it will be surfaced
  before policies are applied instead of at parsing time.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/387

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982343/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982347] Re: Username is case sensitive when applying policies on login

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982347

Title:
  Username is case sensitive when applying policies on login

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  When logging in (either via login or ssh) to an AD account using
  different case combinations, adsysd uses the specified account name
  instead of the lowercase one reported by getent/whoami to apply the
  GPOs. I believe this comes from the pam_get_item call here:
  
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/blob/e3316e5e37970a07f09fa6df553ddac096c91255/pam/pam_adsys.c#L266

  This works but has the unintended side effect of producing multiple
  dconf profile files for each variant of the username, and caching
  policies as well:

  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /etc/dconf/profile/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /var/cache/adsys/policies/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  Of course this all stems from the username retrieved by PAM so there
  might be more unintended side-effects, the dconf one being the easiest
  to observe.

  To ensure an unified experience, when a target name is normalized from
  e.g. DOMAIN\User to User@DOMAIN, it will also be lowercased.

  [Test Plan]

  Reproduction:
  * With adsys set up, log in on the Ubuntu client using an AD account, 
alternating cases
  * Observe multiple files created at /var/cache/adsys/policies

  With the fix applied, remove *all* cached policies at
  /var/cache/adsys/policies and attempt to login with different case
  combinations of the AD account, e.g.:

  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  As root, check the contents of /var/cache/adsys/policies - you should
  only see a lowercase entry: administra...@warthogs.biz

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  Target name normalization is exercised by the code that dumps policies
  applied for a given user, and by the code that updates or creates a
  policy for a given user. If this happens to cause a bug, it will
  render the core part of adsys unusable.

  We believe this is highly unlikely given that in some cases, adsys
  already used the lowercase variant of the username to apply and
  display policies.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/378

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982347/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982345] Re: Cannot parse policy entries with no data

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982345

Title:
  Cannot parse policy entries with no data

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The Default Domain Policy for Computers has a bunch of
  SystemCertificates keys with no data which adsys fails to parse. Here
  are some examples:

  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\ACRS\Certificates
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\ACRS\CRLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\ACRS\CTLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\CA\Certificates
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\CA\CRLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\CA\CTLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Disallowed\Certificates
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Disallowed\CRLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Disallowed\CTLs
  Software\Policies\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\DPNGRA\Certificates

  When examined with a hex editor, these look like the following:

  : 5052 6567 0100  5b00 5300 6f00 6600  PReg[.S.o.f.
  0010: 7400 7700 6100 7200 6500 5c00 5000 6f00  t.w.a.r.e.\.P.o.
  0020: 6c00 6900 6300 6900 6500 7300 5c00 4d00  l.i.c.i.e.s.\.M.
  0030: 6900 6300 7200 6f00 7300 6f00 6600 7400  i.c.r.o.s.o.f.t.
  0040: 5c00 5300 7900 7300 7400 6500 6d00 4300  \.S.y.s.t.e.m.C.
  0050: 6500 7200 7400 6900 6600 6900 6300 6100  e.r.t.i.f.i.c.a.
  0060: 7400 6500 7300 5c00 4100 4300 5200 5300  t.e.s.\.A.C.R.S.
  0070: 5c00 4300 6500 7200 7400 6900 6600 6900  \.C.e.r.t.i.f.i.
  0080: 6300 6100 7400 6500 7300  3b00   c.a.t.e.s...;...
  0090: 3b00   3b00   3b00 5d00  ;.;.;.].

  The last field of the [key;value;type;size;data] stanza is entirely
  empty (semicolon succeeded immediately by a closing brace) whereas we
  expect a null character.

  This is a common occurence on Microsoft's policies like the Default
  Domain Policy. Even if Ubuntu does not have policy entries with no
  data, we must still be able to parse all of them in case a Group
  Policy has both Ubuntu and non-Ubuntu entries.

  [Test Plan]

   * Attempt to apply the Default Domain Policy for Computers on a
  client

  [Where problems could occur]

  Adsys already excluded non-Ubuntu keys before applying policies, so
  this change has no impact other than letting all policies be parsed.
  If an error occurs in parsing an Ubuntu entry, it will be surfaced
  before policies are applied instead of at parsing time.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/384

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982345/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982349] Re: Manage energy profile settings

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982349

Title:
  Manage energy profile settings

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Adsys cannot currently manage GSettings power management keys, such
  as:

  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/ambient-enabled
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-brightness
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-dim
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-ac-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-battery-action
  
/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-suspend-with-external-monitor
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-button-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-saver-profile-on-low-battery
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-type
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type

  [Test Plan]

  * Open the Group Policy Management Editor for a configured policy
  * Navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Ubuntu > 
Client management > Power Management
  * Double click on the last entry: Whether to hibernate ...
  * Enable it, set the value to "hibernate"
  * On a client with adsys, while connected on an AD account, run sudo adsysctl 
update -m -vv
  * Observe the logs that indicate the parsing of the dconf key:

  DEBUG Analyzing entry 
{Key:org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type 
Value:hibernate Disabled:false Meta:s Strategy: Err:} 
  * Observe the output of the following command (it should print 'hibernate'): 
gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power 
sleep-inactive-battery-type

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  This code is located in the dconf policy application manager and
  restricted to it. The negative impact in case of a new bug will be
  seen by gsettings key not being applied.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/135

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982349/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982348] Re: Describe if a key requires an Ubuntu Pro subscription

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982348

Title:
  Describe if a key requires an Ubuntu Pro subscription

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Before applying policies, adsys checks for the existence of an Ubuntu
  Pro subscription. If not found, all keys with the exception of dconf
  keys are filtered, as they require Ubuntu Pro.

  Annotate the generated ADMX/ADML files with this information.

  [Test Plan]

  * Open the Group Policy Management Editor
  * Navigate to User Configuration > Administrative Templates > Ubuntu > 
Session Management > User Scripts > Logoff scripts
  * The description should contain the following line: An Ubuntu Pro 
subscription on the client is required to apply this policy.  

  [Where problems could occur]

  This is a purely visual change that only impacts generated XML files.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/377

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982348/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982351] Re: [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

2022-07-21 Thread Didier Roche
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982351

Title:
  [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
  backport the adsys-windows binary package to 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS.

  ADSys is our Active Directory GPO integration. It’s available starting
  Ubuntu 21.04.

  adsys-windows contains Windows-specific files including a Windows
  executable (the Active Directory Watch Daemon), and XML files
  (ADMX/ADML) that are to be used solely on Windows.

  The package is provided as a safe way for Windows administrators to
  source the required adsys files that are needed on Windows.

  [Impact]

   * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
   * This is a enterprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.

  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the adsys-windows package
  2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable from /usr/share/adsys/windows on a 
Windows machine and run it:
  3. Set a path where the configuration file will be written
  4. Input a list of policy scripts directories to be watched

  The executable will then install itself as a Windows Service and start
  monitoring the given directories for changes. Whenever it notices a
  change it will attempt to bump the version in the GPT.INI file at the
  root of the watched directory. If a GPT.INI is not found, the daemon
  will create one.

  For more information refer to the documentation at:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/11.-Active-Directory-Watch-Daemon

  [Where problems could occur]

  * As this is a separate, versioned, new package, no impact on existing 
installations.
  * Moreover the package has no files that are used in any way on Linux. It's 
just data to be copied on Windows machines.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982351/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982330] Re: Cannot apply policies from uppercase class path like "MACHINE"

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982330

Title:
  Cannot apply policies from uppercase class path like "MACHINE"

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  ADSys cannot update GPOs on Jammy Jellyfish 22.04 because of misnamed
  folders. adsysctl expects the folders to be title cased (e.g.
  Machine), but they are uppercase (e.g. MACHINE). This prevents any
  GPOs from being applied.

  This is a common occurence with GPOs created by Microsoft, like the
  Default Domain Policy.

  [Test Plan]

  Reproduction:
  * Mark the Default Domain Policy as active for the client, and set some 
Ubuntu policy entries.
  * Restart and/or manually sync the client machine.
  * Observe the log message indicating that parsing the GPO failed:

  Policy "Default Domain Policy" doesn't have any policy for class
  "user" open
  
/var/cache/adsys/sysvol/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/User/Registry.pol:
  no such file or directory

  * Observe that the Ubuntu policies were not applied.

  To confirm the bug is fixed, repeat the steps above after applying the
  fix, and the policies should be applied.

  [Where problems could occur]

  * Fixing this bug will allow adsys to parse, and possibly fail when
  applying policies from an uppercase path, whereas before it silently
  ignored them. Fixes for these potential bugs have also been submitted.

  [Other Info]

  The issue was initially reported on GitHub:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/346

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982330/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982342] Re: Cannot parse policies with empty values

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982342

Title:
  Cannot parse policies with empty values

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Focal:
  New
Status in adsys source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  In addition to empty data, some Microsoft policy entries happen to
  have empty values as well. See the following entry:

  // [key;value;type;size;data]
  : 5052 6567 0100  5b00 5300 6f00 6600  PReg[.S.o.f.
  0010: 7400 7700 6100 7200 6500 5c00 5000 6f00  t.w.a.r.e.\.P.o.
  0020: 6c00 6900 6300 6900 6500 7300 5c00 4d00  l.i.c.i.e.s.\.M.
  0030: 6900 6300 7200 6f00 7300 6f00 6600 7400  i.c.r.o.s.o.f.t.
  0040: 5c00 5300 7900 7300 7400 6500 6d00 4300  \.S.y.s.t.e.m.C.
  0050: 6500 7200 7400 6900 6600 6900 6300 6100  e.r.t.i.f.i.c.a.
  0060: 7400 6500 7300 5c00 4100 4300 5200 5300  t.e.s.\.A.C.R.S.
  0070: 5c00 4300 6500 7200 7400 6900 6600 6900  \.C.e.r.t.i.f.i.
  0080: 6300 6100 7400 6500 7300  3b00   c.a.t.e.s...;...
  0090: 3b00   3b00   3b00 5d00  ;.;.;.].

  This fails hard when parsing, returning an `empty value` error,
  rendering the remaining policies unparsable.

  This is a common occurence on Microsoft's policies like the Default
  Domain Policy. Even if Ubuntu does not support policy entries with
  empty values, we must still be able to parse them in case a Group
  Policy has both Ubuntu and non-Ubuntu entries.

  [Test Plan]

   * Attempt to apply the Default Domain Policy on a client

  [Where problems could occur]

  Adsys already excluded non-Ubuntu keys before applying policies, so
  this change has no impact other than letting all policies be parsed.
  If an error occurs in parsing an Ubuntu entry, it will be surfaced
  before policies are applied instead of at parsing time.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/386

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982342/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1248174] Re: Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

2022-07-21 Thread Luís Cunha dos Reis Infante da Câmara
Is there an Ubuntu color palette in any Ubuntu release under standard
support (18.04 or later, including Kinetic)?

** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248174

Title:
  Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Triaged
Status in Inkscape:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Daemon:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Extra Information:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments System:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Viewer:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Web Gallery:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-community:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Community Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Desktop Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in gimp package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in inkscape package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
  HOW TO REPRODUCE
  

  1. In Inkscape create a figure colored "Accent Orange", from the "Ubuntu" 
colour palette.
  2. Compare colour with "Ubuntu Orange" in 
http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette.

  **
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour to be the same.

  **
  REAL BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour is different.
  - The colours listed in the palette from Inkscape have no relationship with 
the ones in design.ubuntu.com.

  ***
  WORK-AROUND
  ***

  - To use the colours in http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette
  instead.

  
  RELEVANT DETAILS
  

  - Orange colour is very similar, but not equal. So it's very probable someone 
use the wrong colour in their designs for Ubuntu.
  - In fact, the logo of "Ubuntu" project in Launchpad is affected 
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu).
  - A demonstrative image is attached to this bug.

  **
  TECHNICAL INFO
  **

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: inkscape 0.48.4-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
  Uname: Linux 3.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Nov  5 13:47:52 2013
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-21 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: inkscape
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-18 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1248174/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969303] Re: "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

2022-07-21 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello frenchy82, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-software into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
software/41.5-2ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969303

Title:
  "No package to remove" error when attempting to uninstall

Status in GNOME Software:
  Fix Released
Status in snap-store-desktop:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-software source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The Ubuntu repository version of gnome-software in 22.04 does not
 allow a user to uninstall an application.
 For new users this could be be construed as disconcerting
 allowing only installing apps without the ability to
 remove those apps later if required.
 
 This SRU is applicable only to the gnome-software application
 installed from the repository and not the branded 
 ubuntu-store snap that is the default in Ubuntu (but not in 
 flavours such as Ubuntu Budgie)
 
 This fix for gnome-software has been backported from the
 v41 version of ubuntu's snap-store.
 
 The fixed software now checks for the status of a deb package
 installed - either manually installed or automatically as
 part of a distro install.  Previously this check was not done
 and gnome-software defaulted to not allowing the package to
 be uninstalled.
 The new status check allows gnome-software to evaluate that
 the package can be uninstalled.

  [Test Plan]

   * Choose a package from the installed list in gnome-software.
 Click the trash icon.  Note the error message that the package
 cannot be removed.
   * install gnome-software from the proposed repository. Logout and
 login.
 Repeat the trash icon click step above.  This time the package
 can be removed.  Confirm via either your distro menu or searching in
 GNOME Overview (if you are using gnome-software from the repository) that 
the
 application has been successfully removed.

   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the 
repository
 (change the source to "Ubuntu (deb)") and then deleting the application.
 
   * Perform additional testing such as installing applications from the snap
 repository (change the source to "Snap") and then deleting the application.

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The code changed is specific to 'packagekit' repos i.e. debian based repos.
 Thus it is sensitive to possible regressions when installing & removing 
apps.
 
   * The patch itself is well tested since it was backported to the ubuntu 
snap-store
 several weeks ago and has been rolled out.  No adverse issues has been 
reported.
 
   * The risk would be that there could be additional changes to the snap-store
 that was not incorporated in gnome-software possibly producing different
 results.
 
   * The additional regression tests in the Test Plan will reveal this.

  
  [Other Info]
   
   * There is no need to backport this to Kinetic since a revised version
 of the patch has been upstreamed (GNOME Team) and is in the kinetic 
version.


  

  
  On a fresh install of Ubuntu 22.04, ubuntu-store won't uninstall any 
application

  If you want to uninstall a software, there is an error message : "no
  package to remove"

  No problem to uninstall this same software with synaptic for example

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1969303/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1248174] Re: Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

2022-07-21 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
In the palettes tab there was an Ubuntu color palette.

** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248174

Title:
  Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Triaged
Status in Inkscape:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Daemon:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Extra Information:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments System:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Viewer:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Web Gallery:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-community:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Community Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Desktop Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in gimp package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in inkscape package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
  HOW TO REPRODUCE
  

  1. In Inkscape create a figure colored "Accent Orange", from the "Ubuntu" 
colour palette.
  2. Compare colour with "Ubuntu Orange" in 
http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette.

  **
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour to be the same.

  **
  REAL BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour is different.
  - The colours listed in the palette from Inkscape have no relationship with 
the ones in design.ubuntu.com.

  ***
  WORK-AROUND
  ***

  - To use the colours in http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette
  instead.

  
  RELEVANT DETAILS
  

  - Orange colour is very similar, but not equal. So it's very probable someone 
use the wrong colour in their designs for Ubuntu.
  - In fact, the logo of "Ubuntu" project in Launchpad is affected 
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu).
  - A demonstrative image is attached to this bug.

  **
  TECHNICAL INFO
  **

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: inkscape 0.48.4-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
  Uname: Linux 3.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Nov  5 13:47:52 2013
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-21 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: inkscape
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-18 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1248174/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982477] [NEW] UI does not work with Linux version 5.15.0-41

2022-07-21 Thread Leo Kotschenreuther
Public bug reported:

After upgrading my Linux kernel to version 5.15.0-41, I am no longer
able to get into the UI. After booting and unlocking the disk I end up
on a black screen with a blinking underscore in the top left corner.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: gdm3 42.0-1ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Thu Jul 21 12:14:04 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-03 (229 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: gdm3
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
mtime.conffile..etc.gdm3.custom.conf: 2022-07-21T11:41:09.164904

** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982477

Title:
  UI does not work with Linux version 5.15.0-41

Status in gdm3 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After upgrading my Linux kernel to version 5.15.0-41, I am no longer
  able to get into the UI. After booting and unlocking the disk I end up
  on a black screen with a blinking underscore in the top left corner.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gdm3 42.0-1ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Thu Jul 21 12:14:04 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-03 (229 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: gdm3
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  mtime.conffile..etc.gdm3.custom.conf: 2022-07-21T11:41:09.164904

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1982477/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982472] [NEW] Support A+N platform

2022-07-21 Thread Bin Li
Public bug reported:

The 'Power Saving Mode' of Nvidia app should change to ATI when the
integrated graphic is Advanced Micro Devices.

[Steps to reproduce]
1. Install the OEM image
2. Boot and log
3. 'Dash' -> 'Nvidia Settings'
4. Verify the 'PRIME Profiles'

[Expected result]
Nvidia (Performance Mode)
Nvidia On-Demand
AMD (Power Saving Mode)

u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|AMD|on-demand|query

[Actual result]
Nvidia (Performance Mode)
Nvidia On-Demand
Intel (Power Saving Mode)

u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|intel|on-demand|query

[Failure rate]
100%

[Other Information]
ubuntu 22.04
nvidia-prime 0.8.17.1
nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu1
nvidia-driver 510.73.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.1

** Affects: oem-priority
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-1981179 sutton

** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1981179 sutton

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-prime in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982472

Title:
  Support A+N platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in nvidia-prime package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The 'Power Saving Mode' of Nvidia app should change to ATI when the
  integrated graphic is Advanced Micro Devices.

  [Steps to reproduce]
  1. Install the OEM image
  2. Boot and log
  3. 'Dash' -> 'Nvidia Settings'
  4. Verify the 'PRIME Profiles'

  [Expected result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  AMD (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|AMD|on-demand|query

  [Actual result]
  Nvidia (Performance Mode)
  Nvidia On-Demand
  Intel (Power Saving Mode)

  u@Thor-P3-AMD-2:~$ prime-select
  Usage: /usr/bin/prime-select nvidia|intel|on-demand|query

  [Failure rate]
  100%

  [Other Information]
  ubuntu 22.04
  nvidia-prime 0.8.17.1
  nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu1
  nvidia-driver 510.73.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1982472/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981837] Re: Using DiNG triggers ubuntu-dock opacity

2022-07-21 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please test:

  https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/pull/1767.patch

If it works for you then I will get it merged upstream.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Patryk Skorupa (skoruppa)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981837

Title:
  Using DiNG triggers ubuntu-dock opacity

Status in Gnome Shell Extension Desktop Icons Ng:
  Unknown
Status in gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Hi,

  Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
  jammy
  Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64 x86_64
  ubuntu-xorg / x11

  I prefer panel and dock to become fully opaque only when windows are
  maximized.

  So I use this extension for panel : Transparent Top Bar (Adjustable
  transparency) which JustWorks™ in both Xorg and Wayland.

  In ubuntu-dock, dynamic-transparency is set through dconf-editor (
  transparency-mode, min-alpha, max-alpha. )

  When using DiNG under Wayland, opacity is triggered as if « desktop »
  was considered as a maximized window.

  Under Xorg, DiNG does not trigger dock opacity, as expected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng/+bug/1981837/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981837] Re: Using DiNG triggers ubuntu-dock opacity

2022-07-21 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I did not, but indeed that sounds like the right fix for dash-to-dock
and ubuntu-dock. I've added a task tracking the bug in ubuntu-dock here.

** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/rastersoft/desktop-icons-ng/-/issues #230
   https://gitlab.com/rastersoft/desktop-icons-ng/-/issues/230

** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng via
   https://gitlab.com/rastersoft/desktop-icons-ng/-/issues/230
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981837

Title:
  Using DiNG triggers ubuntu-dock opacity

Status in Gnome Shell Extension Desktop Icons Ng:
  Unknown
Status in gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
  jammy
  Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64 x86_64
  ubuntu-xorg / x11

  I prefer panel and dock to become fully opaque only when windows are
  maximized.

  So I use this extension for panel : Transparent Top Bar (Adjustable
  transparency) which JustWorks™ in both Xorg and Wayland.

  In ubuntu-dock, dynamic-transparency is set through dconf-editor (
  transparency-mode, min-alpha, max-alpha. )

  When using DiNG under Wayland, opacity is triggered as if « desktop »
  was considered as a maximized window.

  Under Xorg, DiNG does not trigger dock opacity, as expected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng/+bug/1981837/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
The following programs do not have problems with the streams:

* Zoom - works with both my webcam and the Silvercrest Dia Scanner
* MS Teams for Linux - works with the webcam
* Webcamoid - works with both my webcam and the Silvercrest Dia Scanner

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1949183

Is not the same as my problem. 
The video freezes, but I'm still able to take pictures.
The application is responsive.

When I add a second camera device (A silvercrest dia slide scanner), it
results in the same problems. It also continually seems to be busy with
adjusting the white-balance with this device.

pinhole does not freeze, but is very slow and adjusting white-balance 
continually. 
When I switch between devices, the camera stream freezes, just like cheese.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] lsusb.txt

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Attachment added: "lsusb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604527/+files/lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604525/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] lspci.txt

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Attachment added: "lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604526/+files/lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604524/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected gstreamer-error jammy

** Description changed:

  Ubuntu 22.04LTS
  
  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062
  
  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.
  
  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:
  
  >cheese
  
  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.
  
  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.
  
  WebCamoid does not have these problems.
  
  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
+ MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
+ Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcEnviron:
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
+ RelatedPackageVersions:
+  cheese41.1-1build1
+  cheese-common 41.1-1build1
+ Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
+ Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True
+ dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
+ dmi.bios.release: 5.6
+ dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
+ dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
+ dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
+ dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
+ dmi.board.version: J23203-404
+ dmi.chassis.type: 3
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
+ dmi.chassis.version: 2
+ dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
+ dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
+ dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
+ dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
+ dmi.product.version: J26843-405
+ dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

** Attachment added: "CheeseDebug.txt.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604522/+files/CheeseDebug.txt.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Dependencies.txt

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604523/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread lotuspsychje
Also please take a look at bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1949183

to see if this is your case

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
Some extra output of apport-collect:

(cheese:91412): cheese-WARNING **: 10:53:11.868: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

Pijplijn gezet op gepauzeerd ...
Pijplijn klaar en heeft PREROLL niet nodig...
Pijplijn klaar met PREROLL ...
Pijplijn gezet op afspelen ...
New clock: pipewireclock1
FOUT: van element 
/GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstAutoVideoSrc:autovideosrc0/GstPipeWireSrc:autovideosrc0-actual-src-pipewir:
 Internal data stream error.
Extra debug-informatie:
../libs/gst/base/gstbasesrc.c(3127): gst_base_src_loop (): 
/GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstAutoVideoSrc:autovideosrc0/GstPipeWireSrc:autovideosrc0-actual-src-pipewir:
streaming stopped, reason not-negotiated (-4)
Execution ended after 0:00:00.021758105
Pijplijn gezet op NULL ...
Pijplijn wordt vrijgemaakt ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk", line 597, in 
app.run_argv()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 719, in run_argv
return self.run_update_report()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 637, in 
run_update_report
self.crashdb.update(self.options.update_report, self.report,
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/crashdb_impl/launchpad.py", line 
382, in update
report.write_mime(mime, skip_keys=skip_keys)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 547, in 
write_mime
f = open(v[0], 'rb')  # file name
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] Bestand of map bestaat niet: 
'.cache/CheeseDebug.txt'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] Re: cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread lotuspsychje
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better. Please execute the following command only once, as it will 
automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1982463

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-25 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: Intel Corporation NUC6CAYH
  Package: cheese 41.1-1build1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-41.44-generic 5.15.39
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   cheese41.1-1build1
   cheese-common 41.1-1build1
  Tags:  jammy gstreamer-error
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2017
  dmi.bios.release: 5.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: AYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559
  dmi.board.name: NUC6CAYB
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: J23203-404
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 20.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrAYAPLCEL.86A.0043.2017.1123.1559:bd11/23/2017:br5.6:efr20.0:svnIntelCorporation:pnNUC6CAYH:pvrJ26843-405:rvnIntelCorporation:rnNUC6CAYB:rvrJ23203-404:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr2:sku:
  dmi.product.family: Intel NUC
  dmi.product.name: NUC6CAYH
  dmi.product.version: J26843-405
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982463] [NEW] cheese - webcam image frozen

2022-07-21 Thread Hans Dijkema
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu 22.04LTS

Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
has the same freeze problems.

When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

>cheese

(cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

WebCamoid does not have these problems.


cheese:
  Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
  Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
  Versietabel:
 *** 41.1-1build1 500
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: cheese (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Movie of what happens"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463/+attachment/5604518/+files/IMG_0623.MOV

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cheese in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982463

Title:
  cheese - webcam image frozen

Status in cheese package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 22.04LTS

  Related to bug: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-105062

  Not only cheese has this problem, also the "Camera" program of ubuntu
  has the same freeze problems.

  When I start cheese from the command line, it reports:

  >cheese

  (cheese:87986): cheese-WARNING **: 10:38:26.334: Er worden veel buffers 
gedropt.: ../libs/gst/base/gstbasesink.c(3143): gst_base_sink_is_too_late (): 
/GstCameraBin:camerabin/GstViewfinderBin:vf-bin/ClutterGstVideoSink:cluttergstvideosink0:
  There may be a timestamping problem, or this computer is too slow.

  The image freezes and there's no camerastream.

  WebCamoid does not have these problems.

  
  cheese:
Geïnstalleerd: 41.1-1build1
Kandidaat: 41.1-1build1
Versietabel:
   *** 41.1-1build1 500
  500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1982463/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982347] Re: Username is case sensitive when applying policies on login

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  When logging in (either via login or ssh) to an AD account using
  different case combinations, adsysd uses the specified account name
  instead of the lowercase one reported by getent/whoami to apply the
  GPOs. I believe this comes from the pam_get_item call here:
  
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/blob/e3316e5e37970a07f09fa6df553ddac096c91255/pam/pam_adsys.c#L266
  
  This works but has the unintended side effect of producing multiple
  dconf profile files for each variant of the username, and caching
  policies as well:
  
  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /etc/dconf/profile/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  
  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /var/cache/adsys/policies/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  
  Of course this all stems from the username retrieved by PAM so there
  might be more unintended side-effects, the dconf one being the easiest
  to observe.
  
  To ensure an unified experience, when a target name is normalized from
  e.g. DOMAIN\User to User@DOMAIN, it will also be lowercased.
  
  [Test Plan]
  
- * Enable a dconf policy on the AD controller
- * Log in with an AD account, alternating cases
- * Observe multiple files created at /etc/dconf/profile and 
/var/cache/adsys/policies
+ Reproduction:
+ * With adsys set up, log in on the Ubuntu client using an AD account, 
alternating cases
+ * Observe multiple files created at /var/cache/adsys/policies
+ 
+ With the fix applied, remove *all* cached policies at
+ /var/cache/adsys/policies and attempt to login with different case
+ combinations of the AD account, e.g.:
+ 
+ administra...@warthogs.biz
+ administra...@warthogs.biz
+ administra...@warthogs.biz
+ administra...@warthogs.biz
+ 
+ As root, check the contents of /var/cache/adsys/policies - you should
+ only see a lowercase entry: administra...@warthogs.biz
+ 
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
- After login succeeds, an AD username is _always_ reported as lowercase
- by the system, so there are no suspected side-effects of this change.
+ Target name normalization is exercised by the code that dumps policies
+ applied for a given user, and by the code that updates or creates a
+ policy for a given user. If this happens to cause a bug, it will render
+ the core part of adsys unusable.
+ 
+ We believe this is highly unlikely given that in some cases, adsys
+ already used the lowercase variant of the username to apply and display
+ policies.
  
  [Other Info]
  
  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/378

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982347

Title:
  Username is case sensitive when applying policies on login

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  When logging in (either via login or ssh) to an AD account using
  different case combinations, adsysd uses the specified account name
  instead of the lowercase one reported by getent/whoami to apply the
  GPOs. I believe this comes from the pam_get_item call here:
  
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/blob/e3316e5e37970a07f09fa6df553ddac096c91255/pam/pam_adsys.c#L266

  This works but has the unintended side effect of producing multiple
  dconf profile files for each variant of the username, and caching
  policies as well:

  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /etc/dconf/profile/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  root@ubuntu2204:~# ls /var/cache/adsys/policies/ | grep -i administrator
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  Of course this all stems from the username retrieved by PAM so there
  might be more unintended side-effects, the dconf one being the easiest
  to observe.

  To ensure an unified experience, when a target name is normalized from
  e.g. DOMAIN\User to User@DOMAIN, it will also be lowercased.

  [Test Plan]

  Reproduction:
  * With adsys set up, log in on the Ubuntu client using an AD account, 
alternating cases
  * Observe multiple files created at /var/cache/adsys/policies

  With the fix applied, remove *all* cached policies at
  /var/cache/adsys/policies and attempt to login with different case
  combinations of the AD account, e.g.:

  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz
  administra...@warthogs.biz

  As root, check the contents of /var/cache/adsys/policies - you should
  only see a lowercase entry: administra...@warthogs.biz

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  Target name normalization is exercised by the code that dumps policies
  applied for a given user, and by the code that updates or creates a
  policy for a given user. If this happens to cause a bug, it will
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982351] Re: [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Description changed:

  As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
  backport the adsys-windows binary package to 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS.
  
  ADSys is our Active Directory GPO integration. It’s available starting
  Ubuntu 21.04.
  
  adsys-windows contains Windows-specific files including a Windows
  executable (the Active Directory Watch Daemon), and XML files
  (ADMX/ADML) that are to be used solely on Windows.
  
  The package is provided as a safe way for Windows administrators to
  source the required adsys files that are needed on Windows.
  
  [Impact]
  
   * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
-  * This is a entreprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.
+  * This is a enterprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  1. Install the adsys-windows package
- 2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable on a Windows machine and run it:
+ 2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable from /usr/share/adsys/windows on a 
Windows machine and run it:
  3. Set a path where the configuration file will be written
  4. Input a list of policy scripts directories to be watched
  
  The executable will then install itself as a Windows Service and start
  monitoring the given directories for changes. Whenever it notices a
  change it will attempt to bump the version in the GPT.INI file at the
  root of the watched directory. If a GPT.INI is not found, the daemon
  will create one.
  
  For more information refer to the documentation at:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/11.-Active-Directory-Watch-Daemon
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  * As this is a separate, versioned, new package, no impact on existing 
installations.
  * Moreover the package has no files that are used in any way on Linux. It's 
just data to be copied on Windows machines.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982351

Title:
  [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
  backport the adsys-windows binary package to 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS.

  ADSys is our Active Directory GPO integration. It’s available starting
  Ubuntu 21.04.

  adsys-windows contains Windows-specific files including a Windows
  executable (the Active Directory Watch Daemon), and XML files
  (ADMX/ADML) that are to be used solely on Windows.

  The package is provided as a safe way for Windows administrators to
  source the required adsys files that are needed on Windows.

  [Impact]

   * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
   * This is a enterprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.

  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the adsys-windows package
  2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable from /usr/share/adsys/windows on a 
Windows machine and run it:
  3. Set a path where the configuration file will be written
  4. Input a list of policy scripts directories to be watched

  The executable will then install itself as a Windows Service and start
  monitoring the given directories for changes. Whenever it notices a
  change it will attempt to bump the version in the GPT.INI file at the
  root of the watched directory. If a GPT.INI is not found, the daemon
  will create one.

  For more information refer to the documentation at:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/11.-Active-Directory-Watch-Daemon

  [Where problems could occur]

  * As this is a separate, versioned, new package, no impact on existing 
installations.
  * Moreover the package has no files that are used in any way on Linux. It's 
just data to be copied on Windows machines.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982351/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982349] Re: Manage energy profile settings

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  Adsys cannot currently manage GSettings power management keys, such as:
  
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/ambient-enabled
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-brightness
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-dim
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-ac-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-battery-action
  
/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-suspend-with-external-monitor
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-button-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-saver-profile-on-low-battery
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-type
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type
  
  [Test Plan]
  
- * Open the Group Policy Management Editor
+ * Open the Group Policy Management Editor for a configured policy
  * Navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Ubuntu > 
Client management > Power Management
- * Activate any of the entries
+ * Double click on the last entry: Whether to hibernate ...
+ * Enable it, set the value to "hibernate"
+ * On a client with adsys, while connected on an AD account, run sudo adsysctl 
update -m -vv
+ * Observe the logs that indicate the parsing of the dconf key:
+ 
+ DEBUG Analyzing entry 
{Key:org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type 
Value:hibernate Disabled:false Meta:s Strategy: Err:} 
+ * Observe the output of the following command (it should print 'hibernate'): 
gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power 
sleep-inactive-battery-type
  
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
- This feature is additive and only impacts generated files that are used
- solely on Windows.
+ This code is located in the dconf policy application manager and
+ restricted to it. The negative impact in case of a new bug will be seen
+ by gsettings key not being applied.
  
  [Other Info]
  
  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/135

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982349

Title:
  Manage energy profile settings

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Adsys cannot currently manage GSettings power management keys, such
  as:

  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/ambient-enabled
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-brightness
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/idle-dim
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-ac-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-battery-action
  
/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-suspend-with-external-monitor
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-button-action
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/power-saver-profile-on-low-battery
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-ac-type
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-timeout
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type

  [Test Plan]

  * Open the Group Policy Management Editor for a configured policy
  * Navigate to Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Ubuntu > 
Client management > Power Management
  * Double click on the last entry: Whether to hibernate ...
  * Enable it, set the value to "hibernate"
  * On a client with adsys, while connected on an AD account, run sudo adsysctl 
update -m -vv
  * Observe the logs that indicate the parsing of the dconf key:

  DEBUG Analyzing entry 
{Key:org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/sleep-inactive-battery-type 
Value:hibernate Disabled:false Meta:s Strategy: Err:} 
  * Observe the output of the following command (it should print 'hibernate'): 
gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power 
sleep-inactive-battery-type

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  This code is located in the dconf policy application manager and
  restricted to it. The negative impact in case of a new bug will be
  seen by gsettings key not being applied.

  [Other Info]

  This issue was initially reported on GitHub at
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues/135

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982349/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1248174] Re: Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

2022-07-21 Thread Luís Cunha dos Reis Infante da Câmara
What does this bug have to do with GIMP?

** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248174

Title:
  Update the Ubuntu colour palette to fit the spec

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Triaged
Status in Inkscape:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Daemon:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Extra Information:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments System:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Viewer:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Accomplishments Web Gallery:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-community:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu Community Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in Ubuntu Desktop Accomplishments:
  Confirmed
Status in gimp package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in inkscape package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
  HOW TO REPRODUCE
  

  1. In Inkscape create a figure colored "Accent Orange", from the "Ubuntu" 
colour palette.
  2. Compare colour with "Ubuntu Orange" in 
http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette.

  **
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour to be the same.

  **
  REAL BEHAVIOUR
  **

  - The colour is different.
  - The colours listed in the palette from Inkscape have no relationship with 
the ones in design.ubuntu.com.

  ***
  WORK-AROUND
  ***

  - To use the colours in http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette
  instead.

  
  RELEVANT DETAILS
  

  - Orange colour is very similar, but not equal. So it's very probable someone 
use the wrong colour in their designs for Ubuntu.
  - In fact, the logo of "Ubuntu" project in Launchpad is affected 
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu).
  - A demonstrative image is attached to this bug.

  **
  TECHNICAL INFO
  **

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: inkscape 0.48.4-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
  Uname: Linux 3.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Nov  5 13:47:52 2013
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-21 (167 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: inkscape
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-18 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1248174/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982351] Re: [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

2022-07-21 Thread Gabriel Nagy
** Description changed:

  As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
  backport the adsys-windows binary package to 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS.
  
  ADSys is our Active Directory GPO integration. It’s available starting
  Ubuntu 21.04.
  
  adsys-windows contains Windows-specific files including a Windows
  executable (the Active Directory Watch Daemon), and XML files
  (ADMX/ADML) that are to be used solely on Windows.
  
  The package is provided as a safe way for Windows administrators to
  source the required adsys files that are needed on Windows.
  
  [Impact]
  
-  * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
-  * This is a entreprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.
+  * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
+  * This is a entreprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.
  
  [Test Plan]
  
- Copy the adwatchd.exe executable on a Windows machine and run it:
- 1. set a path where the configuration file will be written
- 2. input a list of scripts directories to be watched
+ 1. Install the adsys-windows package
+ 2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable on a Windows machine and run it:
+ 3. Set a path where the configuration file will be written
+ 4. Input a list of policy scripts directories to be watched
  
  The executable will then install itself as a Windows Service and start
  monitoring the given directories for changes. Whenever it notices a
  change it will attempt to bump the version in the GPT.INI file at the
- root of the watched directory.
+ root of the watched directory. If a GPT.INI is not found, the daemon
+ will create one.
  
  For more information refer to the documentation at:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/11.-Active-Directory-Watch-Daemon
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  * As this is a separate, versioned, new package, no impact on existing 
installations.
  * Moreover the package has no files that are used in any way on Linux. It's 
just data to be copied on Windows machines.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982351

Title:
  [SRU] Backport adsys-windows binary package

Status in adsys package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
  backport the adsys-windows binary package to 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS.

  ADSys is our Active Directory GPO integration. It’s available starting
  Ubuntu 21.04.

  adsys-windows contains Windows-specific files including a Windows
  executable (the Active Directory Watch Daemon), and XML files
  (ADMX/ADML) that are to be used solely on Windows.

  The package is provided as a safe way for Windows administrators to
  source the required adsys files that are needed on Windows.

  [Impact]

   * adsys-windows is a new binary package. Impact is thus only for people 
installing.
   * This is a entreprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.

  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the adsys-windows package
  2. Copy the adwatchd.exe executable on a Windows machine and run it:
  3. Set a path where the configuration file will be written
  4. Input a list of policy scripts directories to be watched

  The executable will then install itself as a Windows Service and start
  monitoring the given directories for changes. Whenever it notices a
  change it will attempt to bump the version in the GPT.INI file at the
  root of the watched directory. If a GPT.INI is not found, the daemon
  will create one.

  For more information refer to the documentation at:
  https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/11.-Active-Directory-Watch-Daemon

  [Where problems could occur]

  * As this is a separate, versioned, new package, no impact on existing 
installations.
  * Moreover the package has no files that are used in any way on Linux. It's 
just data to be copied on Windows machines.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1982351/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1980836] Re: Regression in Ubuntu 22.04: Content of form field stored invisibly

2022-07-21 Thread Philipp Wendler
I found out that the bug is actually in poppler and have reported a bug
upstream, where it is being worked on.

** Also affects: poppler (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues #1267
   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/1267

** Also affects: poppler via
   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/1267
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980836

Title:
  Regression in Ubuntu 22.04: Content of form field stored invisibly

Status in Poppler:
  Unknown
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in poppler package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Evince on Ubuntu 22.04 is not able to handle some PDF forms correctly
  anymore that it was able to handle on Ubuntu 21.10 and on Ubuntu
  20.04.

  The symptom is that one can edit the form content and also save it,
  but that the entered text is only visible when the form field is
  focused and in edit mode. Otherwise the text it is invisible, also on
  printouts.

  Such bugs have been reported against Evince for a long time (e.g.,
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/265033) but I
  am reporting this as a new bug because for the current form with which
  I am experiencing this it is a regression.

  I have attached the problematic form with two form fields filled out, one in 
the upper left corner and the big one in the lower half.
  I have produced this by taking the original, empty form (produced by somebody 
else) and first opened it in Evince 41.4, which I have installed from the snap 
package (revision 1017) on Ubuntu 22.04. I entered text in the upper left field 
and saved the form.
  Then I opened the PDF in Evince 42.3 from the apt package of Ubuntu 22.04 and 
entered text in the big field and saved the form.

  Evince 3.36 on Ubuntu 20.04 has the same (correct) behavior as Evince
  41.4.

  When I open the PDF again, only the text in the first field is
  visible. The text in the second field is visible only if I click into
  the field. The visibility of the field contents is the same for Evince
  41.4 (snap), Evince 42.3 (apt), and Okular 20.12.3 (snap). So it seems
  that the problem is with Evince 42.3 incorrectly saving the field
  content, not with displaying it.

  Firefox shows and prints the content of both fields, though.

  Note that I cannot switch back to Evince 41 because for some other
  forms that I have the exact same problem happens only with the old
  version and the new version fixes it. So it seems that something
  changed that fixed it for some forms and broke it for others.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: evince 42.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-40.43-generic 5.15.35
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-40-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jul  6 14:32:27 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-26 (222 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  Snap.Changes:
   ID   Status  Spawn  Bereit 
Zusammenfassung
   137  Done2022-07-06T12:48:33+02:00  2022-07-06T12:48:41+02:00  
Installiere "evince" Snap
  SourcePackage: evince
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-06-22 (13 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1980836/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp