Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2012-06-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-06-23 05:11 AM, Thomas Hood wrote: Should be fixed in Precise. As of which release? I have 0.9.4.0-0ubuntu4.1 installed and I see no evidence of /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/debug (after both having changed the 'RUN=' from no to yes and even changing the permissions to 755) being run

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 293139] Re: NetworkManager does not use dhclient-exit-hooks.d

2012-06-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-06-23 12:42 PM, Thomas Hood wrote: My apologies, I confused this bug with another one. So then you will correct the Fix Released (and whatnot flags)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1056118] [NEW] need update to 15.0.1 on Precise

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: There is a nasty performance issue with TB 15 which is fixed in 15.0.1 according to reports in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787348. I have confirmed this by installing 15.0.1 from https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/thunderbird-stable. This needs to

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1056118] Re: need update to 15.0.1 on Precise

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-09-25 08:45 AM, Chris Coulson wrote: Huh, I thought we'd already updated this???!! (at least, I uploaded it to the security PPA 2 weeks ago). Security PPA? And I'm not sure why it's in the thunderbird-stable PPA. I would imagine because it's the latest stable release? Using those

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049428] Re: Thunderbird 15.0.1 stable update tracking bug

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Just a guess, but failed build on ia64 and sparc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049428 Title: Thunderbird 15.0.1 stable update tracking bug Status in

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 470049] Re: Available to all users is greyed out

2012-07-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-07-13 05:12 PM, Thomas Hood wrote: @Brian: Can you reproduce this in Ubuntu 12.04? Hrm. I guess not. But TBH, I am using Cinnamon on Linux Mint's Maya, which is leveraging Ubuntu 12.04. So I am not entirely sure if the network configuration interface is the same any more. -- You

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1033904] Re: memory leak in gnome-keyring-daemon

2012-08-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033904 Title: memory leak in gnome-keyring-daemon Status in “gnome-keyring” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1033904] [NEW] memory leak in gnome-keyring-daemon

2012-08-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The gnome-keyring-daemon is leaking memory, quite badly. My current gnome-keyring-daemon process's usage: $ cat /proc/25537/status Name: gnome-keyring-d State: S (sleeping) Tgid: 25537 Pid:25537 PPid: 1 TracerPid: 0 Uid:1001100110011001 Gid:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1033904] Re: memory leak in gnome-keyring-daemon

2012-08-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Seriously. Are you folks really that bitter about this Mint thing? I know you know that Mint is nothing more than Ubuntu Linux with usable desktops (i.e. Cinnamon and MATE), for those people that find your tablet-izing Unity desktop simply unusable. Heck, Mint is not even a fork but simply a

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1033904] Re: memory leak in gnome-keyring-daemon

2012-08-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-08-07 07:33 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: @Brian: no biterness there but we have too much to do and I'm not interested to investigate what mint might or might not hack to our packages, But you know, just like you do with your ubuntu package postfix, they postfix the packages they modify

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 848183]

2013-02-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
(In reply to Dominik from comment #30) Workaround: Save attached message to folder (outside Thunderbird) and import it with the addon ImportExportTools. Well, yes. I think we all understand what the workaround is. But I think we all agree that it's cumbersome at best. That's why we are

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So when will this bug be fixed in 12.04, the LTS release that is supposed to be being supported currently? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005504 Title:

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-25 11:33 AM, Björn Michaelsen wrote: fix is in 3.6 released with quantal This doesn't, answer my question about 12.04 which is the current LTS release and should be currently (and for quite a while still) supported. When will this fix go into the current LTS? -- You received this bug

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-25 12:20 PM, Björn Michaelsen wrote: doesnt qualify: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Oh, so LTS == Long Term Support, except where it's not? What's the point of LTS if users have to put up with a whole slew of issues which doesnt qualify to be fixed for (at minimum) the 2

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So debate about LTS aside, back to the issue at hand: how am I as a user of an LTS system supposed to be able to print labels given this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 630022] Re: Twitter authorization page is in French

2011-09-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. Changed (by Omer Akram) in gwibber: importance: Undecided → Low I guess Omer is not Canadian, and presentation language is of low importance to anyone outside of the maintainer's locale? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 264691] Re: NM 0.7 No option for connecting to L2TP IPSEC VPN

2011-11-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
But why have yet another application taking up yet more system tray space to do what NM should be doing itself? IMHO, a completely different application for managing only l2tp-ipsec VPNs when we already have a VPN managing application is the completely wrong approach. This ticket is about this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 886805] [NEW] Font size override doesn't work

2011-11-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: If I try to use Preferences-Mail Preferences-Message Fonts (with Use the same fonts as other applications unchecked of course) to override the general desktop font I can only only override the message display font and not the UI font. Meaning, I can change the selector, it

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 886805] Re: Font size override doesn't work

2011-11-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #663502 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663502 ** Also affects: evolution via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663502 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 239999] Re: nm should support easy bonding

2011-12-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Is there somewhere/how I can track this work upstream? The upstream bug mentioned here doesn't seem to have anything new in it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 239999] Re: nm should support easy bonding

2011-12-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 11-12-28 09:38 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: For all intents and purposes, bonding is now supported by NM (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/log/?qt=grepq=bonding). Sweet! Has the use-case of bonding a standard ethernet interface with WPA[2]-protected wifi

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 914782] Re: ubuntu one music store previews not using proxy

2012-01-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to banshee in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914782 Title: ubuntu one music store previews not using proxy Status in “banshee” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: While

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 914782] [NEW] ubuntu one music store previews not using proxy

2012-01-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: While the Ubuntu One Music Store banshee plugin seems to work behind an authenticating proxy, generally speaking, the fetching of track previews does not appear to be using the proxy authentication credentials and thus gets denied. Moreover, when a preview does fail to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 450916] Re: doesn't see daap services

2012-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I can't confirm or deny this report on Natty since Banshee (or rather, mono) crashes pretty much out of the gate: [Info 10:03:48.732] Running Banshee 2.0.0: [Ubuntu 11.04 (linux-gnu, i686) @ 2011-06-28 05:46:57 UTC] [Info 10:03:51.174] Updating web proxy from GConf [Warn 10:03:51.263] Caught

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 450916] Re: doesn't see daap services

2012-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-01-12 12:21 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote: Looks like the libproxy/webkit bug you mentioned. Shouldn't be per http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=153#c9 (comment #9) which is the work-around I have implemented here locally and it resolves the issue with gnome-clock (so as a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 999214] [NEW] changelog missing for most recent update

2012-05-14 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/libr/libreoffice/libreoffice_3.5.3-0ubuntu1/changelog as linked to from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/libreoffice (and as referenced in update-manager) is a 404. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001606] [NEW] changelog entry missing

2012-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The changelog server entries for release 3.5.3-0ubuntu1 are missing. The following URLs 404 for me here. http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/libr/libreoffice/libreoffice_3.5.3-0ubuntu1/NEWS.Debian

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001606] Re: changelog entry missing

2012-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001606 Title: changelog entry missing Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The changelog server

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001629] [NEW] not updating

2012-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Gwibber does not seem to be getting any updates on twitter. Here's my gwibber log from start to failure to update and including a refresh: 2012-05-19 09:06:46,380 - root MainThread: INFO - Logger initialized 2012-05-19 09:06:46,380 - Service

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001629] Re: not updating

2012-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gwibber in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001629 Title: not updating Status in “gwibber” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Gwibber does not seem to be getting any

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969409] [NEW] gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()

2012-03-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: gnome-terminal spontaneously crashed ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: LinuxMint 12 Package: gnome-terminal 3.0.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.29-generic-pae 3.0.20 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969409] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()

2012-03-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969409 Title: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify() Status in “gnome-terminal” package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939960] Re: segfault in gdk_window_get_screen

2012-03-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Description changed: Got a crash in /usr/lib/gnome-keyring/gnome-keyring-prompt-3. Stack - trace looks remarkably like 890393. + trace looks remarkably like #890393. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: LinuxMint 12 Package: libgtk-3-0 3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] [NEW] rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The ryhthbox package includes the manpage for rhythmbox-client but not the actual binary. It should be included in the rhythmbox package, IMHO. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: LinuxMint 12 Package: rhythmbox 2.90.1~20110908-0ubuntu1.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961403 Title: rhythbox-client not packaged Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The ryhthbox package

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-03-21 01:35 PM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: rhythmbox-client is availabe when rhythmbox is running What does that mean exactly? It doesn't seem to be true anyway: $ ps -ef | grep rhythmbox brian13214 8302 14 21:29 ?00:00:07 rhythmbox brian13284 1 0 21:29 ?

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 901012] Re: no status icon for Rhythmbox in Oneiric

2012-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hello? Any comment from Ubuntu devs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901012 Title: no status icon for Rhythmbox in Oneiric Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu:

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-03-21 10:58 PM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: $ rhythmbox-client --hide /usr/bin/python: can't find '__main__' module in '/usr/share/command-not-found' --hide option has been removed from rhythmbox-client, ~sigh~ Seriously? Are you actually reading and comprehending my comments? The error

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-03-22 11:44 AM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: Looks like you are affected with bug 561046. Please reinstall 'command-not-found' and 'command-not-found-data' package and try launching 'rhythmbox-client' commands again. Dude, surely you can see that this command-not-found issue is completely

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-03-22 12:04 PM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: Did you have rhythmbox running when you launched rhythmbox-client? Try something like 'rhythmbox; pause 10; rhythmbox-client --play' Yes. It's playing in my ear while I do the following: $ ps -ef | grep rhythmbox brian23261 16631 3 10:45 ?

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 961403] Re: rhythbox-client not packaged

2012-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-03-22 12:06 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: $ ps -ef | grep rhythmbox brian23261 16631 3 10:45 ?00:02:36 rhythmbox brian26532 16710 0 12:05 pts/100:00:00 grep rhythmbox $ rhytmbox-client rhytmbox-client: command not found I do see the typo there. Fixing it has

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939960] Re: segfault in gdk_window_get_screen

2012-02-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #670720 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670720 ** Also affects: gtk via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670720 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939960] Re: segfault in gdk_window_get_screen

2012-02-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: Threaded stack trace for segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939960/+attachment/2777186/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939960] [NEW] segfault in gdk_window_get_screen

2012-02-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Got a crash in /usr/lib/gnome-keyring/gnome-keyring-prompt-3. Stack trace looks remarkably like 890393. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: LinuxMint 12 Package: libgtk-3-0 3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic-pae 3.0.17 Uname: Linux

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1094496] [NEW] gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2012-12-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: gnome-keyring-daemon gets killed here every few days due to it's memory size exceeding the site imposed limit of 2GB per process. The ulimit of course is not the problem as even with an unlimited setting, it would just grow until it was killed by the OOM killer. The real

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] [NEW] segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-01-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I have what appears to be a pretty reproducible segfault here in 2.96. If you need any more info, please don't hesitate to ask. FWIW, I do have a full apport crash report but since apport sends whole core files, which these days typically contain account credentials, I

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-01-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This patch appears to fix the segfault in my local testing. ** Patch added: patch to fix segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/1095270/+attachment/3472612/+files/git_bz690993.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-01-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This patch from upstream bug #684351 seems to fix the problem here for me. ** Patch added: patch to fix memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/1094496/+attachment/3474829/+files/10_bz_684351_memory_leak.patch ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #684351

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-01-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-07 01:06 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Thanks Brian, do you have details on how to trigger the leak? Nothing more specific than just sit back and wait. :-) Seriously, I don't to anything special here. I keep SSH and PGP keys in my keyring and ssh a lot and sign every outgoing e-mail.

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-14 02:36 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: This was apparently fixed in rhythmbox 2.98 which is available in Ubuntu 13.04. Which doesn't really do LTS users much good. Can we have a fix backported? Or even just the patch I supplied to this bug applied and released? TBH, getting a fix released

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 09:37 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: Brian, if you want this fix for 12.04 LTS, you should look at the SRU procedures: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Like I said, *I* don't need a release of this in LTS. I have my local patched copy and it's working just fine. But other

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 11:04 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: If you think this patch needs to be in Ubuntu 12.04, then please add more specific information to the description than a pretty reproducible segfault. I have no idea how common the crash is or how to reproduce it myself. Thanks. A segfault is a bug,

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 11:37 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: What specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? TBH, after all of this time, I don't recall. I'm not at all saying that this bug shouldn't be fixed but honestly there isn't enough information here for me to know what the bug is, so it's

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-03-08 08:08 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: The patch is applied in gnome-keyring = 3.6.1, Will that release go into the current LTS, 12.04? LTS is Long Term Support so I would expect it to see bug fixes without requiring individuals to file specific requests to have a bug fixed in it. --

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
But I do have a 12.04 machine and I already submitted a patch (which just came from upstream, not my patch) which fixes the problem on the gnome-keyring shipped in 12.04 LTS. So really, I don't know why you are proposing all of this rigmarole with backporting patches from g-k-r 3.6.1 and

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

2013-05-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This bug was opened 2011-12-17 and it's now 1/3 way into 2013 and it still exists on LTS/precise. Is this bug actually going to get fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1268312] [NEW] vdpau missing

2014-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: It seems that while the libvdpau_nvidia library is available for nvidia- current: /usr/lib/nvidia-current/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.295.40 So such driver is available for nvidia-173-updates. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1268597] [NEW] doesn't see printers from 1.6 servers

2014-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: On current LTS (Precise) CUPS does not see printers advertised from CUPS 1.6 systems. Yes, I understand that the whole CUPS browse feature went away in CUPS 1.6, but that means that current LTS has a functionality hole/regression where CUPS 1.6 servers are concerned. Fedora

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1478364] [NEW] invalid session being saved

2015-07-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: When I log out of my desktop I get some files in ~/.config/gnome-session /saved-session/, pressumably the saving of my session so that it can be restored on next login. But on next login I get an error from gnome-session: env: unrecognized option '--sm-client-id' Try 'env

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1478364] Re: invalid session being saved

2015-07-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
As you will notice, upstream closed this bug OBSOLETE with the explanation: Version 3.9 is an ancient unstable development version and not supported anymore by GNOME developers. GNOME developers are no longer working on that older version, so there will not be any bug fixes by GNOME developers

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989508] Re: hp-plugin unable to load plugin.conf

2022-10-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
What has to happen to get this issue resolved? Are the hplip maintainers even paying attention to the bugs filed here for them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989508

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989508] Re: hp-plugin unable to load plugin.conf

2022-10-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991679 is a duplicate of this ticket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989508 Title: hp-plugin unable to load plugin.conf Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989508] Re: hp-plugin unable to load plugin.conf

2022-10-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I finally did discover the workaround, after a while of (wasted time) searching. But how many other people are going to continue to have to waste time researching how to "work-around" this issue when the solution is a simple matter of just putting the missing file back on the web-server? -- You