revert the change in git. thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325230
Title:
evince does not display ligatures
Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration
Well, the problem being related to web fonts has been already fixed. no
need to revert features at all. I'm keeping this open because I want to
have a new logic or API for web fonts rather than relying on
undocumented/unintentional behavior.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Were you suggesting to use FT_Stream instead? other than that, giving an
empty string as a filename to deal with an on-memory font looks not good
to me at least though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in
I'll merge this change into master shortly if there are no objections.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744812
Title:
FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu Medium font
committed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744812
Title:
FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu Medium font meta-data (No medium
in Inkscape and too bold in Qt apps)
Well, Urdu Nastaliq Unicode seems added by Mandriva guy at
c26344ecfc1d3b85671f5d948a10d5cc27c21c2f. you may need to talk to him
about this change perhaps.
FWIW this is correct metadata for Urdu Nastaliq Unicode:
Pattern has 19 elts (size 32)
family: Urdu Nastaliq Unicode(s)
I'll merge this change into master shortly if there are no objections.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054204
Title:
Libreoffice chooses incorrect font weight
committed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054204
Title:
Libreoffice chooses incorrect font weight
Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library:
Fix
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz38737
This repo contains the initial patch to propose a fix of this issue.
I didn't implement anything about CMap this time. because dealing with it in
fontconfig may be overkill. applications who wants to use this feature should
knows
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz38737
This repo contains the initial patch to propose a fix of this issue.
I didn't implement anything about CMap this time. because dealing with it in
fontconfig may be overkill. applications who wants to use this feature should
knows
the proposed patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz27765
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900
Title:
[Upstream] Bold, Italics, and
updated a bit to add *lang object to the pattern like the original
behavior.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900
Title:
[Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold
I guess we should change the code for FcFontList() too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900
Title:
[Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold Italics not in English on
committed with 7587d1c9.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900
Title:
[Upstream] Bold, Italics, and Bold Italics not in English on Fonts
menu
Status in
updated fclist.c too:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/commit/?h=bz27765
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105900
Title:
[Upstream] Bold, Italics, and
The patch will change the behavior compared to current one. particularly with:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/tree/src/fcdefault.c?h=bz27765#n196
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/tree/src/fclist.c?h=bz27765#n382
the result on LANG=ja_JP say will looks like:
(On
(In reply to comment #5)
Adding set and not_set comparisons sounds sensible to make things clearer,
but I don't think the all behavior is a bug.
the behavior of qual=all itself isn't a problem. I just think either
of cases should be checked with qual=all compare=not_eq even if the
testcase
(In reply to comment #2)
qual=all can actually already be used to test that a value is not set
because
it always returns true when there are no values to test. i.e. All zero values
match.
Hmm, that sounds like a bug though. IMHO we should drop such config
entirely instead of ignoring the
Is it maybe a good idea to have is_set and not_set for compare
attribute?
match target=font
test name=rgba compare=not_set /
edit name=rgba mode=assignconstnone/const/edit
/match
Even though it may be hard to determine which one (no-sub-pixel, sub-
pixel-{bgr,rgb,vbgr,vrgb}) is better for. I
Fixed in 8c58dc27.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792471
Title:
Change default Korean font to ttf-nanum
Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library:
just for reference on this moving:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel.discuss/13090
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792471
Title:
Change
21 matches
Mail list logo
