[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images
Just saw a mention of this bug, and I wanted to provide another datapoint: I recently sponsored a SRU for an irqbalance bugfix (LP #2038300), it was for an edge server platform (NVIDIA IGX Orin). What I noticed was that the code was inherently racy and hard to validate with unit tests because it's trying to read from multiple kernel data structures in virtual filesystems and then take action. I do believe its function would better be provided in the kernel itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems: New Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: as per https://github.com/pop-os/default-settings/issues/60 Distribution (run cat /etc/os-release): $ cat /etc/os-release NAME="Pop!_OS" VERSION="19.04" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 19.04" VERSION_ID="19.04" HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop; SUPPORT_URL="http://support.system76.com; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues; PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy; VERSION_CODENAME=disco UBUNTU_CODENAME=disco Related Application and/or Package Version (run apt policy $PACKAGE NAME): $ apt policy irqbalance irqbalance: Installed: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu disco/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt rdepends irqbalance irqbalance Reverse Depends: Recommends: ubuntu-standard gce-compute-image-packages Issue/Bug Description: as per konkor/cpufreq#48 and http://konkor.github.io/cpufreq/faq/#irqbalance-detected irqbalance is technically not needed on desktop systems (supposedly it is mainly for servers), and may actually reduce performance and power savings. It appears to provide benefits only to server environments that have relatively-constant loading. If it is truly a server- oriented package, then it shouldn't be installed by default on a desktop/laptop system and shouldn't be included in desktop OS images. Steps to reproduce (if you know): This is potentially an issue with all default installs. Expected behavior: n/a Other Notes: I can safely remove it via "sudo apt purge irqbalance" without any apparent adverse side-effects. If someone is running a situation where they need it, then they always have the option of installing it from the repositories. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic
Thanks for the review Robie! Agreed that verification makes sense with a program built against both libraries before and after this fix Why backport 2.14 rather than cherry-pick the corresponding change? It would be feasible to cherry-pick just the change to add symbol versioning (you can see it here: https://github.com/akheron/jansson/pull/540/files), but IMO: 1) we'd have to autoreconf in a patch or at build-time, which would be a similar amount of noise in build files (the patch touches configure.ac, Makefile.am, CMakeLists.txt) 2) I think it's good to land the actual version number bump along with this kind of change: it reflects through the version number that we have this fix in (I know the proper way to check if a feature is there is to test for the feature and not the upstream version), in particular when it's about adding symbol versioning 3) the other minor changes in the new upstream release all seemed conservative fixes addressing simple issues that seemed LTS worthy (some even seemed to border on improving the security of some functions) 4) taking the backport as a whole seemed simplest and less risky than splitting things up Hope you see the same pros and cons and why we went this way -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678 Title: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic Status in jansson package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in jansson source package in Jammy: Incomplete Bug description: [Impact] * jansson 2.13 has a symbol conflict with json-c library.(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966398 & https://github.com/akheron/jansson/issues/523). So an application is linking to both jansson and json-c, there will be 50% of chance that it reference to a wrong symbol, which need to SIGSEGV * In order to fix this issue, both json-c and jansson need to add symbol versioning. jansson library added this in 2.14(not yet in jammy) while json-c added in 0.15 (already in jammy) * And the affecting application should rebuild against the latest json-c and jansson libraries in order to have the correct symbol linked [Test Plan] * jansson is basically available in all of the cpu architecture. So the 1st test will be building in a personal ppa and see if it can be built in every platform. * Some of the library mentioned in the upstream issue checker can be used to verify the fix. But since I am working on a package in a private project which is hitting the issue. I am testing with my private packages(which is on arm64 platform) * Looking into the packages that depends on jansson. There are a large number of packages including network-manager. So I tried to pick 2 packages on my desktop to verify if there is regression 1. network-manager, since it is widely used in Ubuntu 2. emacs, since jansson is a JSON parser, so I pick an application that I can do some operation on JSON(e.g. formatting in emacs) [Where problems could occur] * jansson upstream is well maintained and there is also CI test job. jansson 2.14 is also packaged and maintained by Debian community. It is available for a few months already. So in general, the risk of regression is low in that perspective. * When looking into the changes between 2.13 and 2.14. There are changes in test coverage and some tidy up on the build scripts. The changes look safe but certainly there can be mistake and behaviour changes. But jansson do not depends on other packages and so this kind of regression on build script should be easily caught by test builds in different architecture and a simple integration test with package that depends on jansson. * On the library itself, it added symbol versioning to fix the bug and at the same time there are 3 new API added in 2.14. But these changes should be backward compatible. But since there is new symbols added, there can be new symbol conflict with other library but the impact should just be similar to the original bug that it is already conflict with json-c. There are alos misc fixes in like snprintf checking which looks to be safe. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/+bug/1987678/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic
@Timo/SRU team: I think the debdiff you're seeing is between kinetic and jammy, and since it's essential a backport, it would indeed be trivially small. The debdiff between latest jammy and this SRU corresponds to the new upstream release, and that's the part I've carefully reviewed with Hon Ming and that will bring the relevant fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678 Title: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic Status in jansson package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in jansson source package in Jammy: Incomplete Bug description: [Impact] * jansson 2.13 has a symbol conflict with json-c library.(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966398 & https://github.com/akheron/jansson/issues/523). So an application is linking to both jansson and json-c, there will be 50% of chance that it reference to a wrong symbol, which need to SIGSEGV * In order to fix this issue, both json-c and jansson need to add symbol versioning. jansson library added this in 2.14(not yet in jammy) while json-c added in 0.15 (already in jammy) * And the affecting application should rebuild against the latest json-c and jansson libraries in order to have the correct symbol linked [Test Plan] * jansson is basically available in all of the cpu architecture. So the 1st test will be building in a personal ppa and see if it can be built in every platform. * Some of the library mentioned in the upstream issue checker can be used to verify the fix. But since I am working on a package in a private project which is hitting the issue. I am testing with my private packages(which is on arm64 platform) * Looking into the packages that depends on jansson. There are a large number of packages including network-manager. So I tried to pick 2 packages on my desktop to verify if there is regression 1. network-manager, since it is widely used in Ubuntu 2. emacs, since jansson is a JSON parser, so I pick an application that I can do some operation on JSON(e.g. formatting in emacs) [Where problems could occur] * jansson upstream is well maintained and there is also CI test job. jansson 2.14 is also packaged and maintained by Debian community. It is available for a few months already. So in general, the risk of regression is low in that perspective. * When looking into the changes between 2.13 and 2.14. There are changes in test coverage and some tidy up on the build scripts. The changes look safe but certainly there can be mistake and behaviour changes. But jansson do not depends on other packages and so this kind of regression on build script should be easily caught by test builds in different architecture and a simple integration test with package that depends on jansson. * On the library itself, it added symbol versioning to fix the bug and at the same time there are 3 new API added in 2.14. But these changes should be backward compatible. But since there is new symbols added, there can be new symbol conflict with other library but the impact should just be similar to the original bug that it is already conflict with json-c. There are alos misc fixes in like snprintf checking which looks to be safe. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/+bug/1987678/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678 Title: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic Status in jansson package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in jansson source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * jansson 2.13 has a symbol conflict with json-c library.(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966398 & https://github.com/akheron/jansson/issues/523). So an application is linking to both jansson and json-c, there will be 50% of chance that it reference to a wrong symbol, which need to SIGSEGV * In order to fix this issue, both json-c and jansson need to add symbol versioning. jansson library added this in 2.14(not yet in jammy) while json-c added in 0.15 (already in jammy) * And the affecting application should rebuild against the latest json-c and jansson libraries in order to have the correct symbol linked [Test Plan] * jansson is basically available in all of the cpu architecture. So the 1st test will be building in a personal ppa and see if it can be built in every platform. * Some of the library mentioned in the upstream issue checker can be used to verify the fix. But since I am working on a package in a private project which is hitting the issue. I am testing with my private packages(which is on arm64 platform) * Looking into the packages that depends on jansson. There are a large number of packages including network-manager. So I tried to pick 2 packages on my desktop to verify if there is regression 1. network-manager, since it is widely used in Ubuntu 2. emacs, since jansson is a JSON parser, so I pick an application that I can do some operation on JSON(e.g. formatting in emacs) [Where problems could occur] * jansson upstream is well maintained and there is also CI test job. jansson 2.14 is also packaged and maintained by Debian community. It is available for a few months already. So in general, the risk of regression is low in that perspective. * When looking into the changes between 2.13 and 2.14. There are changes in test coverage and some tidy up on the build scripts. The changes look safe but certainly there can be mistake and behaviour changes. But jansson do not depends on other packages and so this kind of regression on build script should be easily caught by test builds in different architecture and a simple integration test with package that depends on jansson. * On the library itself, it added symbol versioning to fix the bug and at the same time there are 3 new API added in 2.14. But these changes should be backward compatible. But since there is new symbols added, there can be new symbol conflict with other library but the impact should just be similar to the original bug that it is already conflict with json-c. There are alos misc fixes in like snprintf checking which looks to be safe. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/+bug/1987678/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678 Title: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic Status in jansson package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in jansson source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * jansson 2.13 has a symbol conflict with json-c library.(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966398 & https://github.com/akheron/jansson/issues/523). So an application is linking to both jansson and json-c, there will be 50% of chance that it reference to a wrong symbol, which need to SIGSEGV * In order to fix this issue, both json-c and jansson need to add symbol versioning. jansson library added this in 2.14(not yet in jammy) while json-c added in 0.15 (already in jammy) * And the affecting application should rebuild against the latest json-c and jansson libraries in order to have the correct symbol linked [Test Plan] * jansson is basically available in all of the cpu architecture. So the 1st test will be building in a personal ppa and see if it can be built in every platform. * Some of the library mentioned in the upstream issue checker can be used to verify the fix. But since I am working on a package in a private project which is hitting the issue. I am testing with my private packages(which is on arm64 platform) * Looking into the packages that depends on jansson. There are a large number of packages including network-manager. So I tried to pick 2 packages on my desktop to verify if there is regression 1. network-manager, since it is widely used in Ubuntu 2. emacs, since jansson is a JSON parser, so I pick an application that I can do some operation on JSON(e.g. formatting in emacs) [Where problems could occur] * jansson upstream is well maintained and there is also CI test job. jansson 2.14 is also packaged and maintained by Debian community. It is available for a few months already. So in general, the risk of regression is low in that perspective. * When looking into the changes between 2.13 and 2.14. There are changes in test coverage and some tidy up on the build scripts. The changes look safe but certainly there can be mistake and behaviour changes. But jansson do not depends on other packages and so this kind of regression on build script should be easily caught by test builds in different architecture and a simple integration test with package that depends on jansson. * On the library itself, it added symbol versioning to fix the bug and at the same time there are 3 new API added in 2.14. But these changes should be backward compatible. But since there is new symbols added, there can be new symbol conflict with other library but the impact should just be similar to the original bug that it is already conflict with json-c. There are alos misc fixes in like snprintf checking which looks to be safe. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/+bug/1987678/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1987678] Re: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic
I reviewed the diff between 2.14 in kinetic and this upload (just changelog), and I carefully reviewed the 2.13 + Ubuntu changes to 2.14 + Debian changes diff again; outside of some autotools noise, the changes were carefully adding symbol versioning, a few symbols for new functions, and on the packaging side bumping the generated dependencies – +1, uploaded to -proposed (waiting for SRU team to review) ** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool) ** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678 Title: Backport jansson 2.14 to jammy from kinetic Status in jansson package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * jansson 2.13 has a symbol conflict with json-c library.(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966398 & https://github.com/akheron/jansson/issues/523). So an application is linking to both jansson and json-c, there will be 50% of chance that it reference to a wrong symbol, which need to SIGSEGV * In order to fix this issue, both json-c and jansson need to add symbol versioning. jansson library added this in 2.14(not yet in jammy) while json-c added in 0.15 (already in jammy) * And the affecting application should rebuild against the latest json-c and jansson libraries in order to have the correct symbol linked [Test Plan] * jansson is basically available in all of the cpu architecture. So the 1st test will be building in a personal ppa and see if it can be built in every platform. * Some of the library mentioned in the upstream issue checker can be used to verify the fix. But since I am working on a package in a private project which is hitting the issue. I am testing with my private packages(which is on arm64 platform) * Looking into the packages that depends on jansson. There are a large number of packages including network-manager. So I tried to pick 2 packages on my desktop to verify if there is regression 1. network-manager, since it is widely used in Ubuntu 2. emacs, since jansson is a JSON parser, so I pick an application that I can do some operation on JSON(e.g. formatting in emacs) [Where problems could occur] * jansson upstream is well maintained and there is also CI test job. jansson 2.14 is also packaged and maintained by Debian community. It is available for a few months already. So in general, the risk of regression is low in that perspective. * When looking into the changes between 2.13 and 2.14. There are changes in test coverage and some tidy up on the build scripts. The changes look safe but certainly there can be mistake and behaviour changes. But jansson do not depends on other packages and so this kind of regression on build script should be easily caught by test builds in different architecture and a simple integration test with package that depends on jansson. * On the library itself, it added symbol versioning to fix the bug and at the same time there are 3 new API added in 2.14. But these changes should be backward compatible. But since there is new symbols added, there can be new symbol conflict with other library but the impact should just be similar to the original bug that it is already conflict with json-c. There are alos misc fixes in like snprintf checking which looks to be safe. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/+bug/1987678/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962133] Re: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5
Please attach the reproducing pipeline; it's a bit tricky to organise access to Jetson hardware to the right people, so if you had a reproducer that we could run without Jetson hardware, that would be best! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-base1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962133 Title: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5) decode pipeline Status in Gstreamer1.0: Unknown Status in gst-plugins-base1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gst-plugins-base1.0 source package in Bionic: New Bug description: Few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0 (version gst-1.14 and ubuntu-18.04) decode pipeline intermittently yields very low fps (in the range of [~0/1 fps]). Issue seems caused by the gst_video_decoder_drain_out function erroneously getting called inside gst_video_decoder_chain_forward function. Required changes to fix the issue seems available with gst-1.16 and to resolve the issue need to backport the relevant OSS fixes from gst-1.16 to gst-1.14 on ubuntu-18.04. The mentioned issue was reported on with: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796771 Corresponding fix was incorporated with below: https://github.com/GStreamer/gst-plugins-base/commit/62cb08404b9bd055c45cc1d5b71141e927ad748a We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.14.5 on ubuntu-18.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.14 on ubuntu-18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962133/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962134] Re: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on u
Hi Kunal, It might be tricky to organise testing on Jetson platforms for people that will prepare the fix. In any case, could you share instructions to reproduce? If there's a way to craft a test pipeline that trigger the issue without Jetson hardware, that would be best. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962134 Title: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Bionic: New Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Focal: New Bug description: Following gstreamer critical warning observed on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 decoder pipeline: "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" It seems fix for the issue is already incorporated on gstreamer version 1.18 with below: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/commit/a1b41b2b2493069365a8274c6a544e6799a5a8df We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962134/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962134] Re: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on u
This patch landed upstream in 1.17.90, marking only bionic and focal as possibly affected ** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962134 Title: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Bionic: New Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Focal: New Bug description: Following gstreamer critical warning observed on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 decoder pipeline: "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" It seems fix for the issue is already incorporated on gstreamer version 1.18 with below: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/commit/a1b41b2b2493069365a8274c6a544e6799a5a8df We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962134/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962134] Re: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on u
Would you be able to share a reproducing pipeline? ideally that can be run on vanilla Ubuntu rather than on specific hardware or with Nvidia added plugins -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962134 Title: Resolve "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" warning on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Bionic: New Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Focal: New Bug description: Following gstreamer critical warning observed on gstreamer version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 decoder pipeline: "GStreamer-CRITICAL **: 13:33:23.770: gst_buffer_resize_range: assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed" It seems fix for the issue is already incorporated on gstreamer version 1.18 with below: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/commit/a1b41b2b2493069365a8274c6a544e6799a5a8df We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.16 on ubuntu-20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962134/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962135] Re: Upgrade defalult gstreamer version 1.16 minor version on ubuntu-20.04
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962135 Title: Upgrade defalult gstreamer version 1.16 minor version on ubuntu-20.04 Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Focal: New Bug description: On ubuntu-20.04 "apt-get" default installs gstreamer version 1.16.2, though gstreamer has subsequent minor version gst-1.16.3 with fixes incorporated. Hence, Ideally default gstreamer-1.16 minor version support with ubuntu-20.04 should be upgraded to use gstreamer version 1.16.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962135/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962133] Re: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5
The mentioned upstream patch was included in the 1.15.2 release and jammy and focal are unaffected; bionic does not have this patch in 1.14.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 ** Package changed: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) => gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-base1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962133 Title: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5) decode pipeline Status in Gstreamer1.0: Unknown Status in gst-plugins-base1.0 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gst-plugins-base1.0 source package in Bionic: New Bug description: Few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0 (version gst-1.14 and ubuntu-18.04) decode pipeline intermittently yields very low fps (in the range of [~0/1 fps]). Issue seems caused by the gst_video_decoder_drain_out function erroneously getting called inside gst_video_decoder_chain_forward function. Required changes to fix the issue seems available with gst-1.16 and to resolve the issue need to backport the relevant OSS fixes from gst-1.16 to gst-1.14 on ubuntu-18.04. The mentioned issue was reported on with: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796771 Corresponding fix was incorporated with below: https://github.com/GStreamer/gst-plugins-base/commit/62cb08404b9bd055c45cc1d5b71141e927ad748a We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.14.5 on ubuntu-18.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.14 on ubuntu-18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962133/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1962133] Re: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5
Hi Kunal, thanks for your report; I looked at the upstream bug, and I didn't find a reproducer to confirm the bug and its resolution with the patch; would you have one? This might be a candidate for a SRU update; the process is outlined in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and is largely about assessing risk of regressions. ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #796771 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796771 ** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796771 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962133 Title: Intermittent very low fps(sometimes zero) with few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0(version gst-1.14.5) decode pipeline Status in Gstreamer1.0: Unknown Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Few specific h264 and h265 RTSP input streams sources when used with nvidia specific gst-v4l2 based gstreamer-1.0 (version gst-1.14 and ubuntu-18.04) decode pipeline intermittently yields very low fps (in the range of [~0/1 fps]). Issue seems caused by the gst_video_decoder_drain_out function erroneously getting called inside gst_video_decoder_chain_forward function. Required changes to fix the issue seems available with gst-1.16 and to resolve the issue need to backport the relevant OSS fixes from gst-1.16 to gst-1.14 on ubuntu-18.04. The mentioned issue was reported on with: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796771 Corresponding fix was incorporated with below: https://github.com/GStreamer/gst-plugins-base/commit/62cb08404b9bd055c45cc1d5b71141e927ad748a We need to backport above fix on top of gst-1.14.5 on ubuntu-18.04 in order to have out-of-box fix available with default gstreamer-1.0 version 1.14 on ubuntu-18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1962133/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1394204] Re: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event
** Changed in: location-service Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: location-service (Ubuntu RTM) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394204 Title: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event Status in the base for Ubuntu mobile products: Confirmed Status in Location Service: In Progress Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in location-service package in Ubuntu RTM: In Progress Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu RTM: New Bug description: I am consistently seeing this in the Bluefin office this week Mako running 133 Phone gets warm in pocket, wake up the phone and attach top shows dbus-daemon at 100%+ cpu and network-manager next at 10-20% It never quiets own, at least not for over 5 mins 3g data is turned off Cellular is roaming to local carrier fwiw Seems to happen whenever I leave the AP coverage, whether I return or not Reproducing the issue: The problem is easily reproducible when forcing NM to roam between multiple access points and never quite finishing the association to one AP. At home, I reproduce by roaming between different floors, where each floor has got its own WiFi. Any sufficiently complex office WiFi setup should trigger it, too. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1394204/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1394204] Re: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event
I've prepared some test binaries with the proposed fix at http://people.canonical.com/~lool/lp-1394204/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394204 Title: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event Status in the base for Ubuntu mobile products: Confirmed Status in Location Service: New Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in location-service package in Ubuntu RTM: New Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu RTM: New Bug description: I am consistently seeing this in the Bluefin office this week Mako running 133 Phone gets warm in pocket, wake up the phone and attach top shows dbus-daemon at 100%+ cpu and network-manager next at 10-20% It never quiets own, at least not for over 5 mins 3g data is turned off Cellular is roaming to local carrier fwiw Seems to happen whenever I leave the AP coverage, whether I return or not Reproducing the issue: The problem is easily reproducible when forcing NM to roam between multiple access points and never quite finishing the association to one AP. At home, I reproduce by roaming between different floors, where each floor has got its own WiFi. Any sufficiently complex office WiFi setup should trigger it, too. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1394204/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1394204] Re: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event
(there are some binaries for rtm in silo 7) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394204 Title: dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event Status in the base for Ubuntu mobile products: Confirmed Status in Location Service: New Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in location-service package in Ubuntu RTM: New Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu RTM: New Bug description: I am consistently seeing this in the Bluefin office this week Mako running 133 Phone gets warm in pocket, wake up the phone and attach top shows dbus-daemon at 100%+ cpu and network-manager next at 10-20% It never quiets own, at least not for over 5 mins 3g data is turned off Cellular is roaming to local carrier fwiw Seems to happen whenever I leave the AP coverage, whether I return or not Reproducing the issue: The problem is easily reproducible when forcing NM to roam between multiple access points and never quite finishing the association to one AP. At home, I reproduce by roaming between different floors, where each floor has got its own WiFi. Any sufficiently complex office WiFi setup should trigger it, too. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1394204/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1358918] Re: ubuntu-location-serviced cpu usage spikes to 100% occasionally
This hits other users of dbus-cpp API; e.g.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/espoo/+bug/1368247
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to dbus-cpp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358918
Title:
ubuntu-location-serviced cpu usage spikes to 100% occasionally
Status in “dbus-cpp” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in “location-service” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
Occasionally, users report the location service daemon CPU usage to
spike and occupy an entire core of the system. Up until now, we have
no way of reliably reproducing the issue. If you encounter it, please
do the following:
* Report the output of /system/bin/logcat on this bug
* If possible, attach to the location service daemon process with:
* sudo gdb -p ${PID_OF_LOCATION_SERVICE_DAEMON}
* Call generate-core-file inside gdb
* Attach the resuling core.${PID_OF_LOCATION_SERVICE_DAEMON} to this
bug report
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-cpp/+bug/1358918/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1364003] Re: [FFE] mesa 10.3
This broke autopkgtests of some packages; see bug #1374131. This is likely to be removed from utopic-proposed for now to allow other packages to keep transitioning to utopic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364003 Title: [FFE] mesa 10.3 Status in “mesa” package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Impact to ubuntu: Proper support for llvm 3.5 without crashing llvmpipe when running tests on i386. kms swrast was requested, will be available in 10.3. Build fixes to support a gallium megablob, reducing size even further. New features GL_ARB_ES3_compatibility on nv50, nvc0, r600, radeonsi, softpipe, llvmpipe GL_ARB_clear_texture on i965 GL_ARB_compressed_texture_pixel_storage on all drivers GL_ARB_conditional_render_inverted on i965, nvc0, softpipe, llvmpipe GL_ARB_derivative_control on i965, nv50, nvc0, r600 GL_ARB_draw_indirect on nvc0, radeonsi GL_ARB_explicit_uniform_location (all drivers that support GLSL) GL_ARB_fragment_layer_viewport on nv50, nvc0, llvmpipe, r600 GL_ARB_gpu_shader5 on i965/gen7, nvc0 GL_ARB_multi_draw_indirect on nvc0, radeonsi GL_ARB_sample_shading on radeonsi GL_ARB_seamless_cubemap_per_texture on i965, llvmpipe, nvc0, r600, radeonsi, softpipe GL_ARB_stencil_texturing on nv50, nvc0, r600, and radeonsi GL_ARB_texture_barrier on nv50, nvc0, r300, r600, radeonsi GL_ARB_texture_compression_bptc on i965/gen7+, nvc0, r600/evergreen+, radeonsi GL_ARB_texture_cube_map_array on radeonsi GL_ARB_texture_gather on r600, radeonsi GL_ARB_texture_query_levels on nv50, nvc0, llvmpipe, r600, radeonsi, softpipe GL_ARB_texture_query_lod on r600, radeonsi GL_ARB_viewport_array on nvc0 GL_AMD_vertex_shader_viewport_index on i965/gen7+, r600 GL_OES_compressed_ETC1_RGB8_texture on nv30, nv50, nvc0, r300, r600, radeonsi, softpipe, llvmpipe GLX_MESA_query_renderer on nv30, nv50, nvc0, r300, r600, radeonsi, softpipe, llvmpipe A new software rasterizer driver (kms_swrast_dri.so) that works with DRM drivers that don't have a full-fledged GEM (such as qxl or simpledrm) Distribute the Khronos GL/glcorearb.h header file. Changes Removed support for the GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap extension The hacky --enable-32/64-bit is no longer available in configure. To build 32/64 bit mesa refer to the default method recommended by your distribution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1364003/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1365095] Re: Greeter not asking for pin code in image 11 (krillin)
** Also affects: unity8 (Ubuntu RTM) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365095 Title: Greeter not asking for pin code in image 11 (krillin) Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “unity8” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “unity8” package in Ubuntu RTM: New Status in “unity8” source package in 14.09: New Bug description: Flashed with: adb reboot bootloader; ubuntu-device-flash --channel =ubuntu-touch/utopic-proposed --bootstrap phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ system-image-cli -i current build number: 11 device name: krillin channel: ubuntu-touch/utopic-proposed last update: 2014-09-03 17:25:13 version version: 11 version ubuntu: 20140903.1 version device: 20140902-42bae3c Wizard worked fine, and I selected pin code, adding my passwd with 4 digits, but Unity8 is not requesting my pin once it's up (not even after reboot). The welcome wizard is also showing up at every boot. Nothing special in the wizard, accepted everything and skipped the network setup. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365095/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1365095] Re: Greeter not asking for pin code in image 11 (krillin)
** Also affects: unity8 (Ubuntu-rtm 14.09) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365095 Title: Greeter not asking for pin code in image 11 (krillin) Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “unity8” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “unity8” package in Ubuntu RTM: New Status in “unity8” source package in 14.09: New Bug description: Flashed with: adb reboot bootloader; ubuntu-device-flash --channel =ubuntu-touch/utopic-proposed --bootstrap phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ system-image-cli -i current build number: 11 device name: krillin channel: ubuntu-touch/utopic-proposed last update: 2014-09-03 17:25:13 version version: 11 version ubuntu: 20140903.1 version device: 20140902-42bae3c Wizard worked fine, and I selected pin code, adding my passwd with 4 digits, but Unity8 is not requesting my pin once it's up (not even after reboot). The welcome wizard is also showing up at every boot. Nothing special in the wizard, accepted everything and skipped the network setup. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365095/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1239594] Re: New startup sound for 13.10 desktop
Sorry, didn't understand last comment: what is outside the bounds? the whole request or the part about startup command / .desktop changes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239594 Title: New startup sound for 13.10 desktop Status in “ubuntu-sounds” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: We are creating new sounds for Ubuntu. For 13.10 desktop, we'd like to replace the current desktop startup sound with this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo9jkl44qierfk2/ubuntu_startup_mbira_bass.ogg (updated with .ogg instead of .wav) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sounds/+bug/1239594/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1239594] Re: New startup sound for 13.10 desktop
** Changed in: ubuntu-sounds (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239594 Title: New startup sound for 13.10 desktop Status in “ubuntu-sounds” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: We are creating new sounds for Ubuntu. For 13.10 desktop, we'd like to replace the current desktop startup sound with this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo9jkl44qierfk2/ubuntu_startup_mbira_bass.ogg (updated with .ogg instead of .wav) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sounds/+bug/1239594/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1223251] Re: recent saucy update lost its chrome
Doesn't happen with --temp-profile. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223251 Title: recent saucy update lost its chrome Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: The latest chromium update is broken. It has no chrome: no location bar, no bookmarks, you can't open new tabs by hand. It starts multiple copies of itself (and fails to grab the profile lock, and fails to realise it, and only complains about not being able to log in to the account sync thing) and you end up with multiple chromium icons in the launcher. Focus is all over the place. It is now slightly less usable than firefox. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: chromium-browser 29.0.1547.65-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-4.9-generic 3.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-4-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Sep 10 10:00:29 2013 Desktop-Session: DESKTOP_SESSION = ubuntu XDG_CONFIG_DIRS = /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntu:/usr/share/upstart/xdg:/etc/xdg XDG_DATA_DIRS = /usr/share/ubuntu:/usr/share/gnome:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/ Env: MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH = None LD_LIBRARY_PATH = None InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-10-09 (1066 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release Candidate i386 (20100928.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: chromium-browser UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-06-11 (90 days ago) chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS= gconf-keys: /desktop/gnome/applications/browser/exec = b'/usr/bin/chromium-browser\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https/command = b'/usr/bin/chromium-browser --password-store=gnome %U\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https/enabled = b'true\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/command = b'/usr/bin/chromium-browser --password-store=gnome %U\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/enabled = b'true\n'/desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager = b'metacity\n'/apps/metacity/general/compositing_manager = b'true\n'/desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme = b'ubuntu-mono-dark\n'/desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme = b'Ambiance\n' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1223251/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1156310] Re: xrandr detects too many displays
I can also confirm that the kernel from comment #11 (3.8.0-13-generic 3.8.0-13.23~lp1156548v1) fixes it for me on raring with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD; xrandr output now correct and unconfused fb0, lightdm and desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libxrandr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156310 Title: xrandr detects too many displays Status in “libxrandr” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “libxrandr” source package in Raring: New Status in “linux” source package in Raring: Fix Committed Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Raring: Invalid Bug description: Linux Tardis-T500 3.8.0-13-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 15 17:49:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Updated raring on March 16th. After update xrandr is detecting a non- existant VGA display on T500 laptop. expected behavior On boot lightdm would display login page at native resolution for laptop monitor 1680x105 xrandr would detect only LVDS1. actual behavior lightdm displays at lower resolution 1024x768 xrandr detects LVDS1 and VGA1 displays xrandr output Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 32767 x 32767 LVDS1 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 331mm x 207mm 1680x1050 60.0*+ 60.0 59.9 50.0 1600x1024 60.2 1400x1050 60.0 1280x1024 60.0 1440x900 59.9 1280x960 60.0 1360x768 59.8 60.0 1152x864 60.0 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 640x48059.9 VGA1 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 848x48060.0 640x48059.9 DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-13.22-generic 3.8.3 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-13-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true Date: Sun Mar 17 15:20:00 2013 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: raring DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-13-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-6-generic, x86_64: installed DpkgLog: ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (63 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130111) MachineType: LENOVO 2081CTO MarkForUpload: True PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-13-generic root=UUID=860735d2-7dc0-4a91-a04e-67b5d5bbdc40 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/14/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 6FET92WW (3.22 ) dmi.board.name: 2081CTO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6FET92WW(3.22):bd12/14/2011:svnLENOVO:pn2081CTO:pvrThinkPadT500:rvnLENOVO:rn2081CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 2081CTO dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T500 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.03.08-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.42-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu2b1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu1b1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1156310] Re: xrandr detects too many displays
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156310 Title: xrandr detects too many displays Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Linux Tardis-T500 3.8.0-13-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 15 17:49:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Updated raring on March 16th. After update xrandr is detecting a non- existant VGA display on T500 laptop. expected behavior On boot lightdm would display login page at native resolution for laptop monitor 1680x105 xrandr would detect only LVDS1. actual behavior lightdm displays at lower resolution 1024x768 xrandr detects LVDS1 and VGA1 displays xrandr output Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 32767 x 32767 LVDS1 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 331mm x 207mm 1680x1050 60.0*+ 60.0 59.9 50.0 1600x1024 60.2 1400x1050 60.0 1280x1024 60.0 1440x900 59.9 1280x960 60.0 1360x768 59.8 60.0 1152x864 60.0 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 640x48059.9 VGA1 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 848x48060.0 640x48059.9 DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-13.22-generic 3.8.3 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-13-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true Date: Sun Mar 17 15:20:00 2013 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: raring DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-13-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-6-generic, x86_64: installed DpkgLog: ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (63 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130111) MachineType: LENOVO 2081CTO MarkForUpload: True PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-13-generic root=UUID=860735d2-7dc0-4a91-a04e-67b5d5bbdc40 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/14/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 6FET92WW (3.22 ) dmi.board.name: 2081CTO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6FET92WW(3.22):bd12/14/2011:svnLENOVO:pn2081CTO:pvrThinkPadT500:rvnLENOVO:rn2081CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 2081CTO dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T500 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.03.08-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.42-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu2b1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu1b1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.6-0ubuntu3b1 xserver.bootTime: Sun Mar 17 15:00:04 2013 xserver.configfile: default xserver.errors: xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log xserver.version: 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu2b1 xserver.video_driver: intel To manage notifications about this bug go to:
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1156310] Re: xrandr detects too many displays
As mentioned on IRC, kernel from comment #7 fixes it for me on raring with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD; xrandr output now correct and unconfused fb0, lightdm and desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libxrandr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156310 Title: xrandr detects too many displays Status in “libxrandr” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “libxrandr” source package in Raring: New Status in “linux” source package in Raring: Fix Committed Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Raring: Invalid Bug description: Linux Tardis-T500 3.8.0-13-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 15 17:49:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Updated raring on March 16th. After update xrandr is detecting a non- existant VGA display on T500 laptop. expected behavior On boot lightdm would display login page at native resolution for laptop monitor 1680x105 xrandr would detect only LVDS1. actual behavior lightdm displays at lower resolution 1024x768 xrandr detects LVDS1 and VGA1 displays xrandr output Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 32767 x 32767 LVDS1 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 331mm x 207mm 1680x1050 60.0*+ 60.0 59.9 50.0 1600x1024 60.2 1400x1050 60.0 1280x1024 60.0 1440x900 59.9 1280x960 60.0 1360x768 59.8 60.0 1152x864 60.0 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 640x48059.9 VGA1 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 848x48060.0 640x48059.9 DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-13.22-generic 3.8.3 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-13-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true Date: Sun Mar 17 15:20:00 2013 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: raring DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-13-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.2.10, 3.8.0-6-generic, x86_64: installed DpkgLog: ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2114] InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (63 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130111) MachineType: LENOVO 2081CTO MarkForUpload: True PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-13-generic root=UUID=860735d2-7dc0-4a91-a04e-67b5d5bbdc40 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/14/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 6FET92WW (3.22 ) dmi.board.name: 2081CTO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6FET92WW(3.22):bd12/14/2011:svnLENOVO:pn2081CTO:pvrThinkPadT500:rvnLENOVO:rn2081CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 2081CTO dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T500 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.03.08-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.42-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu2b1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu1b1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.4-0ubuntu1b1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1109048] [NEW] upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in unavailable in ??()
Public bug reported: Crashed upower by running sudo pm-suspend from ssh on a nexus 7. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: upower 0.9.19-1ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 3.1.10-9-nexus7 armv7l ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu2 Architecture: armhf Date: Tue Jan 29 16:43:50 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-29 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) - armhf (20130124-15:18) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd ProcEnviron: Signal: 6 SourcePackage: upower StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 raise () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 Title: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in raise() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash armhf raring ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109048 Title: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in unavailable in ??() Status in “upower” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Crashed upower by running sudo pm-suspend from ssh on a nexus 7. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: upower 0.9.19-1ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 3.1.10-9-nexus7 armv7l ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu2 Architecture: armhf Date: Tue Jan 29 16:43:50 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-29 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) - armhf (20130124-15:18) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd ProcEnviron: Signal: 6 SourcePackage: upower StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 raise () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 Title: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in raise() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/1109048/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1109048] Re: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in unavailable in ??()
** Attachment added: Raw crash file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/1109048/+attachment/3506176/+files/_usr_lib_upower_upowerd.0.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109048 Title: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in unavailable in ??() Status in “upower” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Crashed upower by running sudo pm-suspend from ssh on a nexus 7. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: upower 0.9.19-1ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 3.1.10-9-nexus7 armv7l ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu2 Architecture: armhf Date: Tue Jan 29 16:43:50 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-29 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Raring Ringtail (development branch) - armhf (20130124-15:18) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd ProcEnviron: Signal: 6 SourcePackage: upower StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 raise () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 Title: upowerd crashed with SIGABRT in raise() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/1109048/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074279] Re: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM
There are two sides doing locking: lightdm itself, and the individual greeters. Greeters might typically use fancy UI libraries like Gtk+, Qt etc., where it will be hard to clear all password bits; e.g. text input might be passed around multiple layers. Lightdm will typically pass messages to PAM and get some messages back, not necessarily knowing which ones are passwords. Now the greeter is usually not running when the desktop is running, so I guess it's not too bad to mlockall() that process since that memory will be freed up for the desktop after a successful login. Concerning lightdm, we could either scrub all PAM messages after we're done with them, but I'm not sure whether the PAM stack is itself careful about handling not writing passwords to swap and using mlock; another approach would be to implement the lightdm protocol with the greeter in a separate program which would also do PAM, but keep the other common lightdm features separate so that mlocking just the new helper would mlock less memory. NB1: I was hoping that we were locking a lot of shared read-only pages, but pmap on the lightdm process shows that rw pages are mainly from shared libraries: pmap 1586 | grep rw 00627000 4K rw--- /usr/sbin/lightdm 0255a000284K rw---[ anon ] 7f69a800 2584K rw---[ anon ] 7f69b000132K rw---[ anon ] 7f69b6bd7000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files-2.16.so 7f69b6de3000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_nis-2.16.so 7f69b6ffb000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl-2.16.so 7f69b6ffc000 8K rw---[ anon ] 7f69b6fff000 8192K rw---[ anon ] 7f69b780 8192K rw---[ anon ] 7f69b800132K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bc369000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_compat-2.16.so 7f69bc36b000 8192K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bcd6e000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl-2.16.so 7f69bcf72000 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6.0.0 7f69bd17b000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt-2.16.so 7f69bd3b9000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.13.1 7f69bd5c1000 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6.0.0 7f69bd7d9000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libresolv-2.16.so 7f69bd7da000 8K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bd9f9000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libselinux.so.1 7f69bd9fa000 4K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bdc11000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.7 7f69bde15000 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.3504.0 7f69be1d1000 8K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.16.so 7f69be1d3000 20K rw---[ anon ] 7f69be3f 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread-2.16.so 7f69be3f1000 16K rw---[ anon ] 7f69be602000 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0.83.0 7f69be82 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1.1.0 7f69bea26000 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 7f69bed2 4K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3504.0 7f69bed21000 4K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bef72000 4K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3504.0 7f69bf2d3000 8K rw--- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.3504.0 7f69bf2d5000 8K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bf4c9000 36K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bf4f7000 8K rw---[ anon ] 7f69bf4fa000 8K rw--- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.16.so 7fffeb585000132K rw---[ stack ] NB2: the lightdm --session-child process isn't mlock-ed; it would seem this is ok on Linux as memory isn't reused when exec-ing into it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074279 Title: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM Status in Light Display Manager: Triaged Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “lightdm” source package in Raring: Confirmed Bug description: After loging in into the XCFE environment, I open a terminal and perform a top. If I sort the processes by decreasing resident memory, I see that lightdm requires 32MB of memory, that is more than X ! Since lightdm just sleeps after login in, I think it is wasting memory. Could it possibly load/unload features dynamically as gdm already did (many small processes which were launched when a feature was required) ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: lightdm 1.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 2 10:19:19 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-20 (12 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage:
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074279] Re: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM
(just to convince myself that session-child can't see uncleared memory from before the exec()) ** Attachment added: main.c https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1074279/+attachment/3498033/+files/main.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074279 Title: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM Status in Light Display Manager: Triaged Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “lightdm” source package in Raring: Confirmed Bug description: After loging in into the XCFE environment, I open a terminal and perform a top. If I sort the processes by decreasing resident memory, I see that lightdm requires 32MB of memory, that is more than X ! Since lightdm just sleeps after login in, I think it is wasting memory. Could it possibly load/unload features dynamically as gdm already did (many small processes which were launched when a feature was required) ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: lightdm 1.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 2 10:19:19 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-20 (12 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: lightdm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1074279/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074279] Re: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM
Quickly grep-ed shadow (login) and gnome-screensaver, and these don't seem to use mlock at all?! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074279 Title: lightdm uses ~30 Mb of RAM Status in Light Display Manager: Triaged Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “lightdm” source package in Raring: Confirmed Bug description: After loging in into the XCFE environment, I open a terminal and perform a top. If I sort the processes by decreasing resident memory, I see that lightdm requires 32MB of memory, that is more than X ! Since lightdm just sleeps after login in, I think it is wasting memory. Could it possibly load/unload features dynamically as gdm already did (many small processes which were launched when a feature was required) ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: lightdm 1.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 2 10:19:19 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-20 (12 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: lightdm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1074279/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916241] Re: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916241 Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 14 02:55:22 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916241/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916186] Re: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916186 Title: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Can't do anything - no install neither remove . I can not run apt-get install -f NO access to libreoffice now !! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 17:49:36 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2027) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916186/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916221] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916221 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: System is not working at all. I'm unable to explain further. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:32:15 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916221/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916192] Re: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916192 Title: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After huge depencies problems, I removed all libreoffice* packages via apt-get. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 11:04:28 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916206] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916206 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: the update is broken ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic-pae 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:03:33 2012 ErrorMessage: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20120108) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916206/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916185] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script pre-installation nuevo devolvió el código de salida de error 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916185 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script pre-installation nuevo devolvió el código de salida de error 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: i was upgrading to libreoffice 3.5.0-beta2 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-7.13-generic 3.2.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-7-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 20:13:49 2012 ErrorMessage: el subproceso script pre-installation nuevo devolvió el código de salida de error 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20111212) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script pre-installation nuevo devolvió el código de salida de error 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916185/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916178] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916178 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu 12.04 updating libreoffice to 1.3.5 beta from 1.3.4.4 via update manager. Package was installing, came up with error.Subsequently tried to run apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade and then apt-get -f install, getting message unmet dependancies when trying to install libreoffice. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 18:54:31 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2030.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916178/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916179] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916179 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Package failed to install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 13:00:28 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916179/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916197] Re: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916197 Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Problems with libra office after upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-common (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 18:58:27 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110921.2) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916197/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916232] Re: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916232 Title: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using precise and tried to do an update. Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 560384 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:50:49 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110426) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-12 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916232/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916181] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916181 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: just updte on vie, 13 jan 2011 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 20:01:50 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916181/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916176] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
libreoffice-core fails to upgrade unless you run your package manager from / because its preinst uses relative pathnames to delete an old directory. ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:00:45 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... rmdir: αποτυχία διαγραφής «usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/»: Ο κατάλογος δεν είναι κενός dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916176/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916245] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916245 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 01:48:17 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2029.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916245/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916243] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916243 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 14 03:01:41 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916243/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916176] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
After unpacking the .deb and changing: if [ $1 = upgrade -o $1 = install ]; then rm -f `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e s,usr/,/var,g`/basis3.4/program/services.rdb rmdir `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e s,usr/,/var,g`/basis3.4/program/ to: if [ $1 = upgrade -o $1 = install ]; then rm -f `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e s,/usr/,/var/,g`/basis3.4/program/services.rdb rmdir `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e s,/usr/,/var/,g`/basis3.4/program/ I could install the deb and the relevant file got removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:00:45 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... rmdir: αποτυχία διαγραφής «usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/»: Ο κατάλογος δεν είναι κενός dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916176/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916241] Re: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916241 Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 14 02:55:22 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916241/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916232] Re: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916232 Title: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using precise and tried to do an update. Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 560384 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:50:49 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110426) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-12 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916232/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916206] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916206 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: the update is broken ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic-pae 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:03:33 2012 ErrorMessage: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20120108) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916206/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916221] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916221 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: System is not working at all. I'm unable to explain further. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:32:15 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916221/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916181] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916181 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: just updte on vie, 13 jan 2011 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 20:01:50 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916181/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916179] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916179 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Package failed to install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 13:00:28 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916179/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916245] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916245 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 01:48:17 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2029.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916245/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916178] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916178 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu 12.04 updating libreoffice to 1.3.5 beta from 1.3.4.4 via update manager. Package was installing, came up with error.Subsequently tried to run apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade and then apt-get -f install, getting message unmet dependancies when trying to install libreoffice. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 18:54:31 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2030.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916178/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916243] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916243 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: - ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 14 03:01:41 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916243/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916197] Re: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916197 Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Problems with libra office after upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-common (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 18:58:27 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110921.2) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916197/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916192] Re: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916192 Title: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After huge depencies problems, I removed all libreoffice* packages via apt-get. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 11:04:28 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916186] Re: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916186 Title: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Can't do anything - no install neither remove . I can not run apt-get install -f NO access to libreoffice now !! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 13 17:49:36 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (2027) SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916186/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 916176] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271 package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176 Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 13 21:00:45 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... rmdir: αποτυχία διαγραφής «usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/»: Ο κατάλογος δεν είναι κενός dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916176/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 914626] Re: package rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~20111126.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 914623 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914623 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 914623 package rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missing-artwork.svg', which is also in package rhythmbox 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914626 Title: package rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missing- artwork.svg', which is also in package rhythmbox 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: this problem happened when upgrading my system ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 11 08:55:46 2012 DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement rhythmbox-plugins ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rhythmbox-plugins_2.90.1~git20120108.9a9e21b9-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missing-artwork.svg', which is also in package rhythmbox 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missing-artwork.svg', which is also in package rhythmbox 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: rhythmbox Title: package rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rhythmbox-missing-artwork.svg', which is also in package rhythmbox 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-11-11 (60 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/914626/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 898973] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Loïc Minier (lool) ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898973 Title: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 libgtk2.0-0: Installed: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libgtk2.0-cil: Installed: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libgtk2.0-common: Installed: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status gtk2.0-examples: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages monodoc-gtk2.0-manual: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 Version table: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages libgtk2.0-doc: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages libgtk2.0-dev: Installed: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libgtk2.0-0-dbg: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages libgtk2.0-bin: Installed: 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 Candidate: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 Version table: 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages *** 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libgtk2.0-cil-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 Version table: 2.12.10-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages gtk2.0-binver-2.10.0: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version table: librccgtk2-0: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.2.9-3 Version table: 0.2.9-3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages libgwengui-gtk2-0: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.3.0-1ubuntu1 Version table: 4.3.0-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages lazarus-ide-gtk2-0.9.30: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.9.30-3 Version table: 0.9.30-3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages lcl-gtk2-0.9.30: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.9.30-3 Version table: 0.9.30-3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages uim-gtk2.0: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1:1.5.7-9.1ubuntu2 Version table: 1:1.5.7-9.1ubuntu2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-2.5-generic 3.2.0-rc3 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-2-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Dec 2 10:40:23 2011 DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement gtk2-engines-pixbuf:i386 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gtk2-engines-pixbuf_2.24.8-0ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system ErrorMessage: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: gtk+2.0 Title: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.6-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-11-22 (9 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures
** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Precise) Milestone: None = ubuntu-12.04-beta-1 ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 Title: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gzip” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “libtasn1-3” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “pam” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gtk+2.0” source package in Oneiric: Invalid Status in “gzip” source package in Oneiric: Triaged Status in “libtasn1-3” source package in Oneiric: Invalid Status in “pam” source package in Oneiric: Triaged Status in “gtk+2.0” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “gzip” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “libtasn1-3” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “pam” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “gzip” package in Debian: New Bug description: SRU justification: libpam-modules is not multiarch-coinstallable because of unexplained misgeneration of compressed manpages on the buildds in a previous run. This makes it impossible to use pam authentication for foreign-arch software due to the uninstallable modules, and also causes unpleasant upgrade issues. Test case: 1) on amd64, enable armel in addition to i386 as a foreign architecture by running: echo 'foreign-architecture armel' /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch-armel echo 'deb [arch=armel] http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ oneiric main' /etc/apt/sources.list apt-get update 2) try to install libpam-modules for the other two architectures by running 'apt-get install libpam-modules:i386 libpam-modules:armel' 3) confirm that both packages fail to install. 4) enable oneiric-proposed (including for armel above). 5) try to install libpam-modules for all three architectures by running 'apt-get install libpam-modules libpam-modules:i386 libpam-modules:armel' 6) confirm that the packages install successfully. error while updating ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: libpam-modules 1.1.3-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Oct 8 18:57:52 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/man/man8/pam_shells.8.gz' is different from the same file on the system InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: pam Title: package libpam-modules 1.1.3-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/man/man8/pam_shells.8.gz' is different from the same file on the system UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-09 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/871083/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 855747] Re: Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Cache issue, sorry for the noise
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855747
Title:
Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Bug description:
Hi
The presumably simple redirect generated by:
https://wiki.linaro.org/FirefoxBug
seems to break Firefox, but wget and Chromium work fine.
Others have confirmed the redirect issue with oneiric's Firefox.
Firefox says Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur à l'adresse process.
can't locate server at the address process
Cheers,
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: firefox 7.0~b6+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.17-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: lool 3104 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: lool 3104 F...m pulseaudio
BuildID: 20110918113858
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf062 irq 46'
Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)'
Components : 'HDA:14f15051,17aa211f,0010'
Controls : 12
Simple ctrls : 7
Card29.Amixer.info:
Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw
6EHT11WW-1.05'
Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 6EHT11WW-1.05'
Components : ''
Controls : 1
Simple ctrls : 1
Card29.Amixer.values:
Simple mixer control 'Console',0
Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
Playback channels: Mono
Mono: Playback [on]
Channel: beta
Date: Wed Sep 21 19:20:18 2011
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.0.254 dev eth0 proto static
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.119
192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=7.0/20110918113858 (Running)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2009-12-07 (653 days ago)
UserJS:
accessibility.typeaheadfind - true
browser.tabs.forceHide - false
WpaSupplicantLog:
dmi.bios.date: 12/10/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 6EET54WW (3.14 )
dmi.board.name: 2777CTO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6EET54WW(3.14):bd12/10/2010:svnLENOVO:pn2777CTO:pvrThinkPadX301:rvnLENOVO:rn2777CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 2777CTO
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X301
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/855747/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 855747] [NEW] Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Public bug reported:
Hi
The presumably simple redirect generated by:
https://wiki.linaro.org/FirefoxBug
seems to break Firefox, but wget and Chromium work fine.
Others have confirmed the redirect issue with oneiric's Firefox.
Firefox says Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur à l'adresse process.
can't locate server at the address process
Cheers,
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: firefox 7.0~b6+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.17-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: lool 3104 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: lool 3104 F...m pulseaudio
BuildID: 20110918113858
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf062 irq 46'
Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)'
Components : 'HDA:14f15051,17aa211f,0010'
Controls : 12
Simple ctrls : 7
Card29.Amixer.info:
Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw
6EHT11WW-1.05'
Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 6EHT11WW-1.05'
Components : ''
Controls : 1
Simple ctrls : 1
Card29.Amixer.values:
Simple mixer control 'Console',0
Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
Playback channels: Mono
Mono: Playback [on]
Channel: beta
Date: Wed Sep 21 19:20:18 2011
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.0.254 dev eth0 proto static
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.119
192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=7.0/20110918113858 (Running)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2009-12-07 (653 days ago)
UserJS:
accessibility.typeaheadfind - true
browser.tabs.forceHide - false
WpaSupplicantLog:
dmi.bios.date: 12/10/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 6EET54WW (3.14 )
dmi.board.name: 2777CTO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6EET54WW(3.14):bd12/10/2010:svnLENOVO:pn2777CTO:pvrThinkPadX301:rvnLENOVO:rn2777CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 2777CTO
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X301
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug beta-channel oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855747
Title:
Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Hi
The presumably simple redirect generated by:
https://wiki.linaro.org/FirefoxBug
seems to break Firefox, but wget and Chromium work fine.
Others have confirmed the redirect issue with oneiric's Firefox.
Firefox says Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur à l'adresse process.
can't locate server at the address process
Cheers,
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: firefox 7.0~b6+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.17-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: lool 3104 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: lool 3104 F...m pulseaudio
BuildID: 20110918113858
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf062 irq 46'
Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)'
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 855747] Re: Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855747
Title:
Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Hi
The presumably simple redirect generated by:
https://wiki.linaro.org/FirefoxBug
seems to break Firefox, but wget and Chromium work fine.
Others have confirmed the redirect issue with oneiric's Firefox.
Firefox says Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur à l'adresse process.
can't locate server at the address process
Cheers,
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: firefox 7.0~b6+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.17-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: lool 3104 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: lool 3104 F...m pulseaudio
BuildID: 20110918113858
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf062 irq 46'
Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)'
Components : 'HDA:14f15051,17aa211f,0010'
Controls : 12
Simple ctrls : 7
Card29.Amixer.info:
Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw
6EHT11WW-1.05'
Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 6EHT11WW-1.05'
Components : ''
Controls : 1
Simple ctrls : 1
Card29.Amixer.values:
Simple mixer control 'Console',0
Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
Playback channels: Mono
Mono: Playback [on]
Channel: beta
Date: Wed Sep 21 19:20:18 2011
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.0.254 dev eth0 proto static
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.119
192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=7.0/20110918113858 (Running)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2009-12-07 (653 days ago)
UserJS:
accessibility.typeaheadfind - true
browser.tabs.forceHide - false
WpaSupplicantLog:
dmi.bios.date: 12/10/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 6EET54WW (3.14 )
dmi.board.name: 2777CTO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6EET54WW(3.14):bd12/10/2010:svnLENOVO:pn2777CTO:pvrThinkPadX301:rvnLENOVO:rn2777CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 2777CTO
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X301
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/855747/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
