[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1819013] [NEW] Hard dependency on libstdc++ 6.1.0 at runtime on ppc64el on xenial
Public bug reported: $ firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so: /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so) Couldn't load XPCOM. $ ldd /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so | head -1 /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so: /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: firefox 65.0.1+build2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-29-generic ppc64le AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Mar 7 10:00 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Mar 7 10:00 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18 Architecture: ppc64el ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: BuildID: 20190215002040 Channel: Unavailable Date: Thu Mar 7 10:02:49 2019 ForcedLayersAccel: False InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-01-11 (419 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release ppc64el (20170801) IpRoute: default via 10.128.60.1 dev enP2p1s0f0 10.128.60.0/25 dev enP2p1s0f0 proto kernel scope link src 10.128.60.99 NoProfiles: True PciMultimedia: ProcLoadAvg: 2.46 2.48 2.23 3/1329 109239 ProcSwaps: Filename TypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/sda3 partition 379411841110016 -2 ProcVersion: Linux version 4.15.0-29-generic (buildd@bos02-ppc64el-002) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10)) #31~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 18 08:50:43 UTC 2018 RunningIncompatibleAddons: False SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) cpu_cores: Number of cores present = 16 cpu_coreson: Number of cores online = 16 cpu_smt: SMT=8 ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug ppc64el xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1819013 Title: Hard dependency on libstdc++ 6.1.0 at runtime on ppc64el on xenial Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: $ firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so: /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so) Couldn't load XPCOM. $ ldd /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so | head -1 /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so: /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.22' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: firefox 65.0.1+build2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-29-generic ppc64le AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Mar 7 10:00 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Mar 7 10:00 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18 Architecture: ppc64el ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: BuildID: 20190215002040 Channel: Unavailable Date: Thu Mar 7 10:02:49 2019 ForcedLayersAccel: False InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-01-11 (419 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release ppc64el (20170801) IpRoute: default via 10.128.60.1 dev enP2p1s0f0 10.128.60.0/25 dev enP2p1s0f0 proto kernel scope link src 10.128.60.99 NoProfiles: True PciMultimedia: ProcLoadAvg: 2.46 2.48 2.23 3/1329 109239 ProcSwaps: Filename TypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/sda3 partition379411841110016 -2 ProcVersion: Linux version 4.15.0-29-generic (buildd@bos02-ppc64el-002) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10)) #31~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 18 08:50:43 UTC 2018 RunningIncompatibleAddons: False SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) cpu_cores: Number of cores present = 16 cpu_coreson: Number of cores online = 16 cpu_smt: SMT=8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1819013/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1727765] Re: Please upgrade to 5.8
Blocked on https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445 ** Bug watch added: github.com/mono/mono/issues #7445 https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727765 Title: Please upgrade to 5.8 Status in mono package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Please upgrade to 5.8. (Using Ubuntu 17.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1727765/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1762310] Re: Upgrade the Mono version to 5.x
Blocked on https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445 ** Bug watch added: github.com/mono/mono/issues #7445 https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762310 Title: Upgrade the Mono version to 5.x Status in mono package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: It appears that the Mono version included in Bionic Beaver is `4.6.2.7 +dfsg-1ubuntu1`. This is a fairly outdated version considering that Mono 5.0 stable was released about a year ago. Many new Mono programs require a Mono version that is 5.x. For example, Godot states that they require Mono 5.4. Without upgrading the Mono version, users of new Mono applications will have to manually add a repository to get the latest Mono. http://www.mono-project.com/download/stable/#download-lin-ubuntu This is not ideal, we should upgrade the Mono version in the Ubuntu repos. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1762310/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1283172] [NEW] FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1
On 24/02/14 10:56, Iain Lane wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:09:54AM -, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug by directhex (directhex): Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). Can you upload quite soon? Like, the first half of this week? If so, ack. Do it. The latest build, -3, now passes the autopkgtest failures that happened in -1 The only outstanding issue is the obsolete ppc64el binaries which were added in 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 but are basically useless (e.g. p/invoke does not work) - these are in the archive now blocking transition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283172 Title: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1 Status in “mono” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1283172] [NEW] FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1
Public bug reported: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. ** Affects: mono (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283172 Title: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1 Status in “mono” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1283172] Re: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1
** Attachment added: Changes between 3.2.3 and 3.2.8 git tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+attachment/3989953/+files/gitlog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283172 Title: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1 Status in “mono” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1283172] Re: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1
** Attachment added: Build log from PPA https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+attachment/3990044/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.mono_3.2.8%2Bdfsg-1%7Epre1_UPLOADING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283172 Title: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1 Status in “mono” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1283172] Re: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1
** Attachment added: trusty-trusty upgrade log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+attachment/3990115/+files/upgradelog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mono in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283172 Title: FFe: Mono 3.2.3+dfsg-7ubuntu1 - 3.2.8+dfsg+1 Status in “mono” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Mono in Ubuntu has been an old version for a long time, which has begun to reflect negatively on Ubuntu as a platform for current .NET development (which is relevant for e.g. games). I uploaded 3.2.3 a month or two ago with a view to getting a newer, less buggy release into the archive to replace it ASAP, in time for release. 3.2.8 was released on Wednesday, too late to get it packaged up, past Debian NEW, and into Trusty before freeze. Such is life. I strongly feel that we should upgrade to this version. It resolves a number of cross-platform issues and Linux bugs, including official support for ARMHF (our 3.2.3 packages supported this via about 50 cherry-picked patches). The impact should be relatively low (one minor ABI change will affect one rdep, requiring a simple recompile) compared to the existing impact of 3.2.3 - and we're still very early in the freeze with plenty of time left for any bugfixes as discovered. Upstream still does not meaningfully support ppc64el (it will compile, but fail to run any software which calls into C libraries, making it useless) so I feel the ubuntu1 revision should be dropped to eliminate any confusion over arch support. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1283172/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1158018] [NEW] Malformed content-type header causes infinite recursion - crash
Public bug reported: A bug in Evolution (definitely present in 3.6.2 and 2.6.3, fixed in 3.6.4, status in 3.2.x unknown) causes Evolution to crash with an infinite recursion in the attachment formatting code, when attempting to view (via opening or the preview pane) any mail whose Content-type isn't in a format that Evolution expects. This can be triggered, by example, by mail sent by the SOGo groupware. This bug is fixed by the following Evolution commit: https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?h=gnome-3-6id=881533927325432a0bab7eabea3a1d4008b5bcff The bug is reported upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694159 ** Affects: evolution Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: This email will trigger a crash in Evolution in raring/quantal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158018/+attachment/3586823/+files/badmail.txt ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #694159 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694159 ** Also affects: evolution via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694159 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158018 Title: Malformed content-type header causes infinite recursion - crash Status in The Evolution Mail Calendaring Tool: Unknown Status in “evolution” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: A bug in Evolution (definitely present in 3.6.2 and 2.6.3, fixed in 3.6.4, status in 3.2.x unknown) causes Evolution to crash with an infinite recursion in the attachment formatting code, when attempting to view (via opening or the preview pane) any mail whose Content-type isn't in a format that Evolution expects. This can be triggered, by example, by mail sent by the SOGo groupware. This bug is fixed by the following Evolution commit: https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?h=gnome-3-6id=881533927325432a0bab7eabea3a1d4008b5bcff The bug is reported upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694159 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/1158018/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 997042] Re: LDAP address book intermittently non-functional
This is still broken in Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997042 Title: LDAP address book intermittently non-functional Status in “evolution-data-server” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I have a lot of angry users, whose LDAP address book isn't working for them at all, more than 50% of the time. Restarting Evolution and e-d-s can sometimes fix the problem. If a search is done from inside the contacts pane, the occasional error message is: This query did not complete successfully. GDBus.Error:org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook.OtherError: LDAP error 0x20 (No such object) Either this error is shown, or the search spins forever without completing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: evolution-data-server 3.2.3-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 9 11:07:23 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111011) SourcePackage: evolution-data-server UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (11 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/997042/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 997042] [NEW] LDAP address book intermittently non-functional
Public bug reported: I have a lot of angry users, whose LDAP address book isn't working for them at all, more than 50% of the time. Restarting Evolution and e-d-s can sometimes fix the problem. If a search is done from inside the contacts pane, the occasional error message is: This query did not complete successfully. GDBus.Error:org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook.OtherError: LDAP error 0x20 (No such object) Either this error is shown, or the search spins forever without completing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: evolution-data-server 3.2.3-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 9 11:07:23 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111011) SourcePackage: evolution-data-server UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (11 days ago) ** Affects: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997042 Title: LDAP address book intermittently non-functional Status in “evolution-data-server” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I have a lot of angry users, whose LDAP address book isn't working for them at all, more than 50% of the time. Restarting Evolution and e-d-s can sometimes fix the problem. If a search is done from inside the contacts pane, the occasional error message is: This query did not complete successfully. GDBus.Error:org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook.OtherError: LDAP error 0x20 (No such object) Either this error is shown, or the search spins forever without completing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: evolution-data-server 3.2.3-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 9 11:07:23 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111011) SourcePackage: evolution-data-server UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (11 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/997042/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 997042] Re: LDAP address book intermittently non-functional
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997042 Title: LDAP address book intermittently non-functional Status in “evolution-data-server” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I have a lot of angry users, whose LDAP address book isn't working for them at all, more than 50% of the time. Restarting Evolution and e-d-s can sometimes fix the problem. If a search is done from inside the contacts pane, the occasional error message is: This query did not complete successfully. GDBus.Error:org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook.OtherError: LDAP error 0x20 (No such object) Either this error is shown, or the search spins forever without completing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: evolution-data-server 3.2.3-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 9 11:07:23 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111011) SourcePackage: evolution-data-server UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (11 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/997042/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
