[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2011305] [NEW] package libgl1-mesa-dri 22.3.6-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i915_dri.so« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket l

2023-03-11 Thread schollsky
Public bug reported: Error during update ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04 Package: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.3.6-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.1.0-16.16-generic 6.1.6 Uname: Linux 6.1.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1903916] [NEW] Default keys cannot be restored from keyserver

2020-11-11 Thread schollsky
Public bug reported: Hi all, the default keys for trustworthy software sources are gone (or at least won't display) in software-properties-gtk in Groovy Gorilla MATE. I tried to recreate them by using the button in bottom right corner. After entering system password no change seems to be done.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text with wrong size in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 (mostly on Nvidia)

2020-09-23 Thread schollsky
Update to mutter 3.36.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 in focal/proposed also fixed the bug for AMD. Good work, thanks and cheers! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892440 Title:

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-09 Thread schollsky
Hi Cristiano, on 09.09.20 um 18:47 you wrote: > This thread is about a bug in "mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2". Just it. > (not about arguing philosophies). You are partially right. > As it is a bug, it ends up embarrassing people. It's normal. Agreed. > "Freedom of choice" doesn't mean bad

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-09 Thread schollsky
> PopOS pushed a fix pretty quickly, so you > can see that there are Ubuntu flavors who are actively managing > themselves better than Canonical is managing the main distro. Isn't PopOS more a new distro based on Ubuntu rather than a flavor like KUbuntu, UbuntuMate, XUbuntu? However, when PopOS

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-09 Thread schollsky
Hi Cristiano, on 09.09.20 um 18:47 you wrote: > This thread is about a bug in "mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2". Just it. > (not about arguing philosophies). You are partially right. > As it is a bug, it ends up embarrassing people. It's normal. Agreed. > "Freedom of choice" doesn't mean bad

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-09 Thread schollsky
Hello Telework Inc. on 09.09.20 um 17:26 you wrote: > That’s an extremely limited perspective, Stefan. My point is that ideally, > nobody would push a version of mutter with a massive bug that breaks > desktops around the world in the first place. OK, you state it's a massive bug breaking

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-09 Thread schollsky
This tendency is childish. If you want warranted security with fast(?) bug fixing, look out for a proprietary OS solution or better contribute to Ubuntu by coding support. Please stop behaving like a child: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_ain't_no_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch If you want

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892440] Re: Shell text is too small in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2

2020-09-07 Thread schollsky
I see the same problem, running AMD GPU RX580 and X11 (problem doesn't seem to apper in Wayland). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892440 Title: Shell text is too small

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1851936] Re: User profile won't load after upgrade - prompt to create new profile

2020-05-04 Thread schollsky
Dear Sirs, bug reappears with single home directory under dual boot condition with Manjaro. Could this be fixed or do I have to reinstall package and/or config file? Kind regards schollsky -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed