In windows my pc can connect wirelles but in elmentary my pc do ot have
wirelles
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism
** Changed in: network-manager-applet
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
** Changed in: network-manager-applet
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
Verified in 16.04 that there is no setting for priority in nm-applet.
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #766454
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766454
** Also affects: network-manager-applet
In KDE, it is fixed. There is a priority field.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be
For those on Xenial and later, can you please confirm if there is GUI-
support for this or if it's cli-only?
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
This should be fixed in at least Yakkety and Xenial with upstream commit
a7c8e5c6e9aad. This being "
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be prioritized" in
Network-Manager. Clearly, there are still further possible improvements and
upstream is already discussing a few in
will this fix arrive to the current LTS or just the next one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks
Any progress on this? Specifically I would need this function in my
Ubuntu Touch phone ;)
BR Florian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please
@flohack: If U want this as feature in Ubuntu-Touch - U should register
a separate bug against this applicaction ->
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=ubuntu-
touch=names=all=all
U won't get any results/progress here, period - if U don't register a
bug-report against the package in
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: networkmanagement (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
I love to see the Fix released message!
Now I just wonder how to make my system use the fixed version? Will this
happen 'automagically' on my Ubuntu Studio 14.04 box?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in
Well, the fix must be released, and the fixed version be included into
Ubuntu. Be awere that this is just a feature implemented with an API in
the Network manager core with an API, so clients like nm-applet must
expose this functionality for it to be easily used.
** Also affects:
Launchpad has imported 6 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194101.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi
Hmm, are you unable to change the Wifi name?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be prioritized
@Marius I have exactly the same problem with the University network and
the global EDUROAM network. And no, I can't change the name of any of
them; I just want NM to connect to my local University network whenever
available, even if last time I manually connected to the global EDUROAM
--- because
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi
I have my wireless at home. I also have a FON (fonera) account. The
problem is that my neighbor have a FON router also and his signal
strength is as strong as mine. Every time i turn on the computer, i
have about 50% change of getting the right wireless, mine. Other times i
have all networks
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #580018
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580018
** Changed in: network-manager
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #359556 = GNOME Bug Tracker #580018
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Unknown = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
IMHO, I agree with the previous several posters: anno 2014, AP
priorities are not a luxury, but necessity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please
The thing could be solved with just one bit of priority thing. I
already commented to the upstream bug
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359556 and had no answers.
I imagine that using the NM scripts dispatcher you can implement some
workaround, though:
There won't ever be user-defined priorities in NM.
Does that mean that someone needs to create something else than NM,
if NM never will solve the problems users have? That's kind of a sad statement.
Please confirm.
NM connects to the last
network you've connected to that it can find. When
As far as i know OSX has a list where you can drag-n-drop networks. The
closer to the top, the higer the priority. The suggestion from #20
sounds good though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
Why do essential features so often take so long to enter Ubuntu.
Did they really already give up their desktop OS because the money lies in
phones and tablets?
They should first finalize their far-from-done desktop OS instead of messing
around in other markets.
--
You received this bug
There won't ever be user-defined priorities in NM.
Old comment, no rationale. Time for a change ?
Instead of full-blown network prioritization which would involve a gui
to sort connections and careful thinking to ensure that the connection
selection stays predictable, would it be enough to add
that comment is from 2007 and hopefully things will be reconsidered
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi
Quote from upstream report
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359556):
There won't ever be user-defined priorities in NM. NM connects to the last
network you've connected to that it can find. When you connect, NM timestamps
the network, and it will first connect to the most recent
Yeah as AirBreather wrote, nobody here suggested changing the active
connection. Just setting the basic priorities when a new connection is
formed. This should be pretty basic stuff that has been implemented
everywhere else almost 10 years ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you
The problem is not so simple:
Once I've ordered the list of networks (A, B, C), suppose I'm connected
to network A, and nm detects there is no connectivity (i.e. no ping to
gateway, or DNS), then it should fallback to network B.
The problem here is how to decide when to go back to network A
Mariano,
I do not believe that users such as myself are requesting that NM should
upgrade an active connection from B to A when it detects that this is
possible.
The request is to allow users to configure the order in which NM
automatically tries to connect to networks. If I have a T3 line to
Same here, University WIFI should have priority but if that WIFI is not
available the automatic connection should fallback to my ad-hoc
connection
Any workaround?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in
** Summary changed:
- wifi network priority
+ Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be prioritized
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780
Title:
34 matches
Mail list logo
