Re: Welcome Mark Owens (new committer)

Welcome Mark On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:44 PM Michael Hogue wrote: > Mark, > > Congrats and thanks for your contributions! > > Mike > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 17:59 Mike Walch wrote: > > > Welcome Mark! > > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Christopher > wrote: > > > > > Accumulo devs, > > >

Re: New committer: Luis Tavarez

Way to go Luis On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM Keith Turner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Mike Walch wrote: > > Join me in welcoming Luis Tavarez as a new Apache Accumulo committer and > > PMC member! Luis worked on a major refactor of the Accumulo monitor for > > the upcoming 2.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove tracer service (not instrumentation)

ation projects to use Accumulo as a backing store). > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 6:34 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > I am in favor of removing the tracer ui from the monitor and the tracer > > service that stores the spans in Accumulo. I worry about doing so with a > > worki

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove tracer service (not instrumentation)

I am in favor of removing the tracer ui from the monitor and the tracer service that stores the spans in Accumulo. I worry about doing so with a working alternative though. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 6:25 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Do we have a migration story ready to go for folks that are used to see

Re: [VOTE] Switch to GitHub issues

+0 On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:48 AM Christopher wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 22:12 Ed Coleman wrote: > > > +0 I defer to others. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Keith Turner [mailto:ke...@deenlo.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:53 PM > > To: Accumulo Dev List > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.7.4 and the 1.9.0

Thanks Ed, this all sounds good. Does anyone need a 1.8.2 release? On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:43 AM Keith Turner wrote: > I am +1 on the dates you proposed and i can run test on EC2 for both > releases. I would like to see 1.9.0 released earlier than you > suggested. > > As for the performance

Re: Additional options for issue tracking

While I love github issues, I do have concerns about 2 separate issue tracking systems. Can you elaborate on what you are trying to solve? Let's make sure we give everyone time to discuss before making this change. On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:31 PM Mike Walch wrote: > I want to enable GitHub issu

Re: Reverting performance improvements for 1.7

+1 - looking forward to trying these out On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:56 PM Keith Turner wrote: > Recently Mike and I have made some performance improvements. We made > these to 1.7 and 1.8 branches. I am thinking of reverting these > changes in the 1.7 branch and keeping them in the 1.8 branch.

New Apache Accumulo Committer/PMC member Adam Shook

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited Adam Shook to become a committer and PMC member and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. The typical first act with your new committer bit is to move yourself from the "Contributors" section to the "PMC and Committe

Re: Impala integration [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Matt, I have not heard of anyone doing anymore with Impala besides that ticket. CC'ing the dev list for wider dissemination. Mike On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 8:43 PM Dickson, Matt MR < matt.dick...@defence.gov.au> wrote: > *UNOFFICIAL* > > > > I’m looking at integrating Impala with Accumulo and not

[REPORT] Apache Accumulo - January 2018

## Description: - The Apache Accumulo sorted, distributed key/value store is a robust, scalable, high performance data storage system that features cell-based access control and customizable server-side processing. It is based on Google's BigTable design and is built on top of Apache Had

Re: [DISCUSS] Any interest in separate client/server tarballs

ning tests against > MAC and a real Accumulo cluster transparent -- > StandaloneAccumuloCluster), then I could see some JAR that we'd include > which would contain the necessary classes (on top of > accumulo-client.jar) for users to run code seamlessly against a > traditional MA

Re: [DISCUSS] Any interest in separate client/server tarballs

I like the idea of a client jar that has less dependencies. Josh, where are thinking the MiniAccumuloCluster fits in here? On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:57 PM Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM Keith Turner wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > tl;

Re: Draft Board Report for Jan 2018

pache/accumulo-docker -- On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:09 PM Michael Wall wrote: > All good ideas. > > Mike, the Summit was held 16 Oct. I submitted the last report on 11 Oct > and the board meet on 18 Oct. The summit was mentioned, but I can mention > it again with a link. I

Re: Draft Board Report for Jan 2018

: > > > Could mention an Accumulo tour was created for the website > > https://accumulo.apache.org/tour/ > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > > > The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board > > > reports on

Draft Board Report for Jan 2018

The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due by Wednesday, Jan 10. Please let me know if you have any suggestions, I plan to submit on the 9th. Mike -- ## Description: - The Apache Accumulo sorted, dist

Re: Updated Accumulo People page

I am fine removing the link to github contributions as well. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM Keith Turner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > Can we please remove the link to the github "contributors based on > commits" > > feature? > > I don't feel too strongly ab

Re: Unable to drop the table

eteTable > locked: > [R:1, W:5] locking: [] top: CleanUp > > txid: 415a00837cf58a6a status: IN_PROGRESS op: DeleteTable > locked: > [R:1, W:4] locking: [] top: CleanUp > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Wall

Re: Unable to drop the table

What version of Accumulo are you running? Maybe you are hitting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4143? If so, see search the user mailing list for how to fix a hanging droptable Mike On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:38 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Please inspect the Accumulo Master log runnin

[REPORT] Apache Accumulo October 2017

## Description: - The Apache Accumulo sorted, distributed key/value store is a robust, scalable, high performance data storage system that features cell-based access control and customizable server-side processing. It is based on Google's BigTable design and is built on top of Apache Hadoop, Zoo

Re: Draft Board Report for Oct 2017

that we have new contributors. > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board > > reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due by > > Wednesday, Oct 11. Please let me know if you

Draft Board Report for Oct 2017

The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due by Wednesday, Oct 11. Please let me know if you have any suggestions, I plan to submit on the 11th. Mike -- ## Description: - Description goes here- The Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.8.2

Its currently > assigned > to you. > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > Mike Miller has 2 tickets in progress and the issue Keith mention is the > > only blocker I saw. Once those are complete, I am in favor of a 1.8.2 > > release. I a

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.8.2

Mike Miller has 2 tickets in progress and the issue Keith mention is the only blocker I saw. Once those are complete, I am in favor of a 1.8.2 release. I am happy to do the release again and continue as the 1.8 release manager. I am also happy to help someone else do that. It is a patch releas

Re: accumulo.metadata table online but scans hang

Nick First step to make sure you have plenty of HDFS space. Seems like restarting fixed your du bug, so hopefully you are good there. Consider turning on HDFS trash as well, it can be very useful for recovery. Second step is to get your metadata table happy. Try the touchz for the WAL logs and

Re: New committer/PMC: Ivan Bella

Congrats Ivan. Well deserved. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017, 12:01 Christopher wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited Ivan > Bella to become a committer and PMC member and we are pleased to announce > that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier cont

Re: Draft Board Report for Jul 2017

approved the use of the Apache Accumulo > trademark for the 4th annual Accumulo Summit, to be held on October 16th, > 2017 in Columbia, MD. > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board > > repor

Draft Board Report for Jul 2017

The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due by Wednesday, Jul 12 . Please let me know if you have any suggestions, I plan to submit on the 12th. Mike -- ## Description: - The Apache Accumulo

Re: [DISCUSS] any blockers on current release lines?

2016. I don't really care where the landing page page, I just think it shouldn't be some from 2016. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:37 PM Michael Wall wrote: > I've got one maybe two for 1.8, but right now jira seems funky. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO

Re: [DISCUSS] any blockers on current release lines?

I've got one maybe two for 1.8, but right now jira seems funky. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO is going to some Accumulo Hackathon 2016 kanban board. Any know anything about that. I'll look again tonight and try to find those tickets I have been wanting to talk about the tickets

Re: Accumulo upgrade rollback...

Hi Bob, Unfortunately, rolling back an upgraded system is not an automated task. Moving from 1.5.4 to 1.6.6 as you saw !METADATA changed to accumulo.metadata and accumulo.root. The upgrade also changes the data version of the rfiles, so any new files written from mutations or compactions will not

Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox

Late to this thread, but wanted to offer my 2 cents. Having done several releases, the search and bulk edit features of Jira were really key. Moving all those issues is really the worst part of doing a release, because you have to open each one and try to understand enough about it to make a decis

Re: Correct configuration for NetBeans to use Accumulo,Hadoop,Zookeeper

Hi Guiseppe, Josh had forwarded your email to the user list at u...@accumulo.apache.org when he replied to you. I responded to that email. Mike On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:29 PM Pino wrote: > Hello everyone, > I claim I have never worked with Accumulo, > I should develop a Java application usin

Re: recovering Accumulo instance from missing root WALs (deleted by gc)

Jonathan, Sorry you are having problems here. What version are you using? Do you have hdfs trash turned on? If so, look for those logs in the trash. If you find them, simply move them back. If you can't find them, then the data is gone. You can try an "hdfs dfs -touchz " on the locations and

Re: Draft Board Report for Apr 2017

as we try to finalize what the 2.0.0 release will look like. > """ > > Nit: s/anniversay/anniversary/ > > Michael Wall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board > > reports on the dev list. Here is a dra

Draft Board Report for Apr 2017

ivity levels on mailing lists, git and JIRA remain constant. ## PMC changes: - After 5 years of Billie Rinaldi's leadership, Michael Wall was adopted as the new PMC Chair in Mar. - Currently 29 PMC members. - No new PMC members added in the last 3 months - Last PMC addition was Mike Wa

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.7.3 Released

The Accumulo team is proud to announce the release of Accumulo version 1.7.3! This release contains changes from more than 75 issues, comprised of bug-fixes, performance improvements, build quality improvements, and more. This is a maintenance (patch) release. Users of any previous 1.7.x release ar

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

Downloads page actually updated now. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:37 PM Michael Wall wrote: > Oops, missed committing my updates to the download pages somehow. Fixing > now > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:36 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > Completed the following > > - Updated dow

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

Oops, missed committing my updates to the download pages somehow. Fixing now On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:36 PM Michael Wall wrote: > Completed the following > > - Updated downloads page > - Finished release notes > - Generated new javadocs > - Updated example text files by

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

. Thanks Mike On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:47 AM Michael Wall wrote: > I am going to work on getting this finished up today. > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:55 AM Michael Wall wrote: > > Thanks Christopher, thanks Ed. Ed, let me if you want help finishing up > the release notes.

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

I am going to work on getting this finished up today. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:55 AM Michael Wall wrote: > Thanks Christopher, thanks Ed. Ed, let me if you want help finishing up > the release notes. > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:23 AM Ed Coleman wrote: > > Thanks - The de

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

t limited, or if he got stuck. I'm > betting on the former, but if it's the latter, Ed, please reach out, and we > can try to work together to improve the release process with some better > docs for next time. Thanks. > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:42 AM Michael Wall wro

Re: Accumulo 1.7.3 release notes preview

Ed, Looks pretty good. Couple of comments Release notes link should be https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312121&version=12335841. That won't change in jira after the release is finished. Noticed the javadocs link (http://accumulo.apache.org/1.7/apidocs/) didn't

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

Thanks Ed On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM Ed Coleman wrote: > The vote to release 1.7.3.rc2 has met the voting criteria (+72 hours, at > least 3 +1 votes) and has passed. Vote results: > > +1 - 3 > 0 - 0 > -1 - 0 > > I will begin working on the release notes and other release artifacts > forth

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc1

Event: Failed: Signature Validation Monday, March 06, 2017 07:08:37 EST (GMT-0500) typeId signature-staging failureMessage No public key: Key with id: (fc4368e0864bcc36) was not able to be located on http://gpg-keyserver.de/. Upload your public key and try the operation again. failureMessage No pub

Re: [Release Test - No Vote] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc0

Signatures checked out. Ran 'mvn verify -Psunny' successfully on my mac with Java 1.7 in 43 min. Looks good Ed. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:21 PM Michael Wall wrote: > Awesome, thanks for starting this Keith. I talked with Ed and was going > to start it up tomorrow if you hadn

Re: [Release Test - No Vote] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc0

Awesome, thanks for starting this Keith. I talked with Ed and was going to start it up tomorrow if you hadn't already. Let me know if you need any help. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:30 PM Keith Turner wrote: > I completed a successful 1 day run of CI+verification w/o agitation on > EC2 using Much

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.8.1 Released

The Accumulo team is proud to announce the release of Accumulo version 1.8.1! This release contains changes from more than 40 issues, comprised of bug-fixes, performance improvements, build quality improvements, and more. This is a maintenance (patch) release. Users of any previous 1.8.x release a

Re: Release preparation for 1.7.3

No apologies needed Ed. Thanks for stepping up to make a release. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Ed Coleman wrote: > Now that 1.8.1 has been wrapped up I plan on starting the release process > for 1.7.3 this weekend. > > I've been able to run the --test version of the release process and can

Re: [VOTE] 1.8.1-rc1

* Built Fluo using mvn verify against the artifacts in the staging repo > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > Accumulo Developers, > > > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.1. There are no > > changed to t

Re: [VOTE] 1.8.1-rc1

As noted in the release notes, continuous integration was run for 24 hours without agitation and another 24 hours with agitation on a 9 node cluster. Both runs succeeded. See details at http://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-1.8.1/#testing On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 PM Michael Wall

[VOTE] 1.8.1-rc1

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.1. There are no changed to the artifacts since RC0. Git Commit: 49420c3d8e6268d4c54efdd95cf457360facfbe8 Branch: 1.8.1-rc0 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache

Re: Accumulo 1.8.1-rc0

oads$ cat accumulo-1.8.1-bin.tar.gz.md5 > 2c6ad4822087907130dd682e0cb9c50d > > 11:05:03 ~/Downloads$ gpg --verify accumulo-1.8.1-bin.tar.gz.asc > accumulo-1.8.1-bin.tar.gz > gpg: Signature made Fri 10 Feb 2017 12:50:39 PM EST using RSA key ID > B8C3D406 > gpg: Good signature from "

Re: Accumulo 1.8.1-rc0

essList > > to property of type java.util.ArrayList -> [Help 1] > > [ERROR] > > > > All I did was download the source to my Fedora AWS instance, unpack and > > run maven. > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > >> Accumu

Accumulo 1.8.1-rc0

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.1. This is not a VOTE, simply information so you can get started testing. Expect an RC1 and a vote next week unless issues are found with this candidate. Git Commit: 49420c3d8e6268d4c54efdd95cf457360facfbe8 Branch

Re: [DISCUSS] Time to RELEASE 1.7.3?

> > > > Ed Coleman wrote: > > > >> With all of the work that Michael Wall has done towards releasing 1.8.1, > >> 1.7.2 is also in good shape and I would like to start the release > process > >> for a 1.7.3, unless there are any objections. > >> >

Re: Time for a 1.8.1?

in 1.8.1. If I moved a ticket you need in 1.8.1, sorry please move it back. Thanks On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:21 AM Michael Wall wrote: > I will be moving tickets from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2 this morning. I know Ed has > a couple that I'll leave 1.8.1. If I move something you need

Re: Time for a 1.8.1?

fixed to > test ingest and query. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM, DAVID MARION > wrote: > > > I can test the RC with Timely. We found and fixed an issue in the 1.8.0 > > release that way. > > > > > > > > On January 19, 2017 at 8:08 AM Micha

Re: Time for a 1.8.1?

ease candidates to get the current > outstanding fixes pushed. > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:29 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > Thinking it is time for a 1.8.1 release. I'm happy to be the release > > manager since I did the 1.8.0. Just trying to get a

Re: january 2017 board report draft

+1 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board > > reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on > >

Time for a 1.8.1?

Thinking it is time for a 1.8.1 release. I'm happy to be the release manager since I did the 1.8.0. Just trying to get a sense for where people think we are. Mike

Re: YourKit license

Oh, I see we already have that, http://accumulo.apache.org/thanks. I'll send them a note. On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > Has anyone approached YourKit about an open source license? Looks like > they ask that you reference them on our page. https://www.

YourKit license

Has anyone approached YourKit about an open source license? Looks like they ask that you reference them on our page. https://www.yourkit.com/purchase/#os_license Mike

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.6-rc2

pache Accumulo Team On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > I can take a stab at now. I'll reply with the draft for review before it > goes out. > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Christopher wrote: > >> Okay, everything is done on the website. We still need

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.6-rc2

> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:32 PM Christopher wrote: > > > >> This vote passes with +3 (not including Mike's late +1). I'll push > things > >> out to dist tonight and try to put together some release notes and > update > >> the downloads page tomorrow. >

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.6-rc2

I know I am late, but I have a +1 too. Did some of the same checks everyone else did. Did not have time to run to CI. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > * good sig > * was able to run a single node instance from tar ball, load some > data, verify, and view monitor

Re: Gentle reminder: Vote on 1.6.6-rc1

Thanks for the reminder Josh. I have been doing some testing and will vote before the deadline. Haven't found any issues so far. I did not start any CI though. Has anyone else? Is CI needed? On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Oops, more like ~25hrs (what are timezones...)

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.8.0 Released

The Accumulo team is proud to announce the release of Accumulo version 1.8.0 ! Accumulo 1.8.0 is a minor release that includes over 200 bug fixes, 71 improvements and 4 new features. This release is backwards-compatible with 1.7.x. This version is now available in Maven Central, and at: https://

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4

system that features cell-based access control and customizable server-side processing. It is based on Google's BigTable design and is built on top of Apache Hadoop, Apache ZooKeeper, and Apache Thrift. -- The Apache Accumulo Team --- Thanks On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Michael

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4

> * Successfully ran Timely ITs > * Tested multiple tablet servers locally > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael Wall" > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 1:38:00 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4 > > I

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4

, let me know if anything is missing from release notes, or anything should be added. Mike On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. > > Git Commit: > a8a6329576869ac9ed63e4

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: a8a6329576869ac9ed63e4eff577af1c1864f052 Branch: 1.8.0-rc4 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 a8a6329576869ac9ed63

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

ething is broke with "bin/accumulo > rfile-info", which I need to investigate. Also not a blocker, but would be > unfortunate if that didn't work out of the box. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:31 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > I know they are late, but draft release no

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

+1 from me, I haven''t seen anything that should prevent 1.8.0 from being released. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > I know they are late, but draft release notes are up at > https://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.8.0. If this vote passes, > I'

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

nt period > leading up to this release, because those tests are not run by default. > > I would like to do a quick run of these skipped and failed tests, to see if > they pass, before I vote. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > Continuous ingest

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

ss (in public API) > IteratorAdapter which extends a non-public API class > (o.a.a.c.i.IteratorAdapter). I'm not worried about this because Mock has > been deprecated for a bit. > > Michael Wall wrote: > >> Accumulo Developers, >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

Unit tests pass. > * Good checksums and sigs. Fingerprint matches Mike's key. > * Graphulo tests pass. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > Accumulo Developers, > > > > Please consider the follo

Re: Orphaned MAC processes

I have seen that on occasion Josh. I'll run a single IT and find that not all the process were cleaned up. I recall those processes being stuck in the shutdown from the jstack, but maybe I am confusing projects. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Tried running the ITs overni

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Err, strike that. > > Just saw https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428 > > I'm pretty sure this is saying that we will never remove WALs for old > TServers. We should be looking at this before cutting another release. > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> +1 >>

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d Branch: 1.8.0-rc3 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 ad281753325b4d9d593a

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

;s not new. >> >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 18:33 Josh Elser wrote: >> >> We're ready to go now, Mike. >>> >>> Michael Wall wrote: >>> >>>> I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. >>>> >

1.8.0 RC3

I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. See 1.8.0 Dave, Sean and Christopher, please take a look at these tickets and move them to 1.8.1 or let me know a timeframe for completion? I can take a l

Re: [VOTE] Plan for next release

+1 After talking this over with Christopher and others since Fri, I really like the following: - easing the testing burden by removing the 1.8 branch that needed to be tested against both Java 1.7 and 1.8 - simplifying development by getting back to developing in master - finally getting to use Ja

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

10:53 AM Michael Wall wrote: > > > Ok, the run-verify MR took over 5 hours. I think muchos needs some > tweaks > > in yarn settings. > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Josh Elser > wrote: > > > > > Uhh, woah. That's a rather big discrepan

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

, but not most of them. This is > > unexpected. > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:33 PM wrote: > > > >> +0 (because I had issues running mvn verify. I kept running out of > memory > >> at the tests module even with Xmx of 2560M) > >> > >

Re: Release notes for 1.8.0 (was: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2)

crawling it. > > Thanks Mike! > > > Michael Wall wrote: > >> I have started the release notes, I'll get a draft up today. Does it need >> to say draft somewhere? >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >> Have you starte

Re: Release notes for 1.8.0 (was: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2)

I have started the release notes, I'll get a draft up today. Does it need to say draft somewhere? On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Have you started this process, Mike Wall? > > I seem to recall you said you were making a list, but might not have > gotten to updating the webs

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8

I am good with requiring Java 8 and moving to 2.0 for the release. Doesn't look like the vote for 1.8.0 is going to pass, which is good. That gives us a little more time to discuss this. We will have to redo all the testing, which is fine too. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Christopher wrote

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

the > table (exactly, IIRC). > > > Michael Wall wrote: > >> The accumulo monitor showed 22.86 B entries in the ci table. Should that >> match the verify output? >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Josh Elser >> wrote: >> >> I didn't time

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

e. I also had to > knock back the hdfs replication for the ci table from 3 to 2 after about 12 > hrs because I was running out of space. That probably also helped my run go > faster :) > > > Michael Wall wrote: > >> Cool, thanks Josh. How long did you run? I ran 24

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

me. >>> >>> I still need to go through the rest of the diligence on rc2 (for >>> licensing stuff) as well as complete the verify. >>> >>> Michael Wall wrote: >>> >>>> Accumulo Developers, >>>> >>>> Please consid

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc2

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: e5694cfa5ec3861e6f8f764e2b8477716e3072b9 Branch: 1.8.0-rc2 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 e5694cfa5ec3861e6f8f

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc1

provide an instance name when prompted or simply hit enter? >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> I downloaded the binary tarball and tried to set this up, but I >>>> cannot get >>>> `accumulo init` to

Re: Snappy as default table.file.compress.type?

I like the idea of making snappy the default. However, I am concerned about raising the barrier of entry to new users by adding yet another dependency to install. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > No, I never asserted that Snappy is *always* the better choice. I would > say

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc1

ut I cannot > get > >> `accumulo init` to run. It just keeps prompting me for the instance name > >> over and over again. > >> > >> Have I done something dumb? > >> > >> Michael Wall wrote: > >> > >>> Accumulo Devel

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc1

votes are majority -- Accumulo is > different in that we often treat release votes as consensus). > > Making the vote longer is fine without re-casting it, making it shorter > (but not shorter than 72hrs) would be bad thing to do. > > Michael Wall wrote: > >> Understood o

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc1

ke On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > I would also like to run some long running test on EC2. I probably > not be able to get to that until Mon morning. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > Accumulo Developers, > > > >

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc1

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: 3a85a113e30b13d3ef948f8c8d86b281d16cc3ec Branch: 1.8.0-rc1 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 3a85a113e30b13d3ef94

Re: Accumulo ITs on ASF Jenkins

Yes, thanks Sean. They had been running in about 2 hours, but the last one took 6 hrs. I am clicking through to figure out which test took so long. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Cool. Thanks for the info! > > > Sean Busbey wrote: > >> Right now it is manually maintained

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for a 1.8.0 release?

nkins reports the single test failure as two, though: > https://jenkins.revelc.net/job/Accumulo-1.8-ITs/36/ > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:51 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > I have been able to get every IT to pass at least once except the > following > > > > A

<    1   2   3   >