I am facing similar issue ,However in my case the whole body is truncated.
websocket connection from my web page to the apollo(1.7.1) broker,connects
to the broker and sends a message to the queue using websockets.(using
example under examples/websockets in download)
This is working fine.
On the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14313709#comment-14313709
]
gaikwaja commented on AMQ-3402:
---
I was able to reproduce this issue as follows opened
Done. Please make sure you merge your local trunk to master and continue
to work on master.
If you push trunk, there is nothing that prevents the creation of a new
branch 'trunk' that we'll have to merge and remove again.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 02/08/2015 09:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Bertram resolved ACTIVEMQ6-76.
-
Resolution: Implemented
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/90
Implement
Matt Pavlovich created AMQ-5574:
---
Summary: OSGi import ranges for javax.jms should include version
2.0
Key: AMQ-5574
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5574
Project: ActiveMQ
Thank you Hadrian.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Renaming-trunk-to-master-tp4689494p4691265.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14313059#comment-14313059
]
James Carman commented on AMQ-5574:
---
You'd probably not want to go up to just 2. Most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14313100#comment-14313100
]
Arthur Naseef commented on AMQ-5574:
From what I understand of the JMS 2 spec, I agree;