Done. Please make sure you merge your local trunk to master and continue
to work on master.
If you push trunk, there is nothing that prevents the creation of a new
branch 'trunk' that we'll have to merge and remove again.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 02/08/2015 09:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
I created the master branch myself.
INFRA-9111 is still open. I don't have the karma to remove the 'trunk'
branch. Please use 'master' from now on. Let's follow the commits to
trunk and merge them to master, make sure nothing gets lost.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/03/2015 04:14 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Per agreement in this thread, now that 5.11.0 is out, I sent a
request to infra [1] to rename trunk to master.
Please keep an eye on it so you don't loose work.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9111
On 01/06/2015 07:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
+1
Maybe we should wait with the rename until we have 5.11.0 released
(there’s
some work involved like reconfiguring jenkins and stuff, so it'll delay
release)
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell
<robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 for the rename.
Using "master" is typical and this is definitely a change now made by
infra during migrations, based on experience of migrating a couple of
things into Git repos at Qpid recently.
On 5 January 2015 at 18:27, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow
overlooked.
Any
objection to rename?
Hadrian
