[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388237#comment-14388237
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
It's possible that it took longer than 30 seconds
Stefan Warten created AMQ-5695:
--
Summary: KahaDB not cleaning up log files
Key: AMQ-5695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5695
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-5008.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.12.0
Assignee: Dejan Bosanac
This is now fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388377#comment-14388377
]
Jakub Korab commented on AMQ-5696:
--
This could be a case of incorporating the code into the
Jakub Korab created AMQ-5696:
Summary: Make performance test tool into standalone executable
Key: AMQ-5696
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5696
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type:
I second Hadrian there.
Regards
JB
On 03/27/2015 05:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
If that is true, that's one more reason to grow the project in the
incubator. You are basically confirming yet again, that we have a RH
community taking over the ActiveMQ community.
That large community you
The only way this proposal would help is if, once we have an API
(and it seems some people, especially those actually working on
the broker have some real doubts about its feasibility), we can adapt
the current activemq5 broker without actually fully rewriting it. Is
that even possible ?
If this
+1
Regards
JB
On 03/30/2015 03:23 PM, James Carman wrote:
All,
With all the talk over the last week or so regarding the Broker
Wars, especially after reading Rob Davies' email about how the broker
has been tweaked through the years to emphasize different aspects
(long-term storage for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Tully updated AMQ-5558:
Summary: Make some activemq jar executable and able to send/receive
messages (was: Make activemq-client jar
GitHub user jimrobinson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/76
fix the inconsistency with ElectingLevelDBStore.isMaster() under AMQ-5082
I've run through 100 iterations of the ElectingLevelDBStoreTest, I believe
this fixes the intermittent issue with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389928#comment-14389928
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5082:
-
GitHub user jimrobinson opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389818#comment-14389818
]
J G commented on AMQ-5579:
--
Hi All,
I am new around here, so sorry if I get the etiquette wrong...
Github user gaohoward commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/197#issuecomment-88303437
ok great.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389831#comment-14389831
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-94:
-
Github user gaohoward commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389878#comment-14389878
]
J G commented on AMQ-5579:
--
Replication code and instructions as well as log files from Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-5697.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/commit/8bb58036
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/191#issuecomment-88107925
Looks good @clebertsuconic . Ack.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388582#comment-14388582
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-89:
-
Github user mtaylor commented on the
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/198
ACTIVEMQ6-95 Large Message doesn't work on clustering null Persistence
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-95
The message.copy is broken when you set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388698#comment-14388698
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-95:
-
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a
Dejan Bosanac created AMQ-5697:
--
Summary: Authorization map doesn't handle composite destinations
properly
Key: AMQ-5697
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5697
Project: ActiveMQ
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/191
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Timothy Bish created AMQ-5698:
-
Summary: AMQP: Transport factories are not applying wireFormat.*
options to newly created Transport instances.
Key: AMQ-5698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5698
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/189
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5698.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on master.
AMQP: Transport factories are not applying wireFormat.* options to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388703#comment-14388703
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-89:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389200#comment-14389200
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-95:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389197#comment-14389197
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
This is from a successful run:
2015-03-31
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14388891#comment-14388891
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5082:
---
Most recent Jenkins build indicates there is still an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389036#comment-14389036
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
I'm running some iterations of the test now, to see
I'm not sure how this proposal fits into the existing ActiveMQ solution at
this point. It should be feasible to start down this path and consider how
it fits later down the line.
Giving it a little thought right now, one possible approach would be to get
the API defined, and then make a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389116#comment-14389116
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
If I run the test enough times I can get a failure.
clebert suconic created ACTIVEMQ6-95:
Summary: Null Persistency Large Message doesn't work on Bridges
and copies
Key: ACTIVEMQ6-95
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-95
Project:
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/199
Use the context class loader in FileConfiguration
Avoid loading problems of file configurations in
servlet containers when packaging the hornetq libs
not in the war file (e.g. in
Github user jimrobinson closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/74
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389681#comment-14389681
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5082:
-
Github user jimrobinson closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-4740.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by AMQ-5155
heart-beat is disabled when connecting to web socket
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish closed AMQ-5169.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: 5.12.0
CLONE - heart-beat is disabled when connecting to web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389459#comment-14389459
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
So, for some reason the call to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/197#issuecomment-88254940
@gaohoward I would like to see this asynchronous. I will make some
thinking on this tomorrow, ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389444#comment-14389444
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-94:
-
Github user clebertsuconic commented
Timothy Bish created AMQ-5699:
-
Summary: AMQP: Update to released Proton-J 0.9
Key: AMQ-5699
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5699
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5155.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.12.0
Assignee: Timothy Bish (was: Dejan Bosanac)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389735#comment-14389735
]
Jim Robinson commented on AMQ-5082:
---
It's not at all clear to me how master_stopped is
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy/1289/changes
Changes:
[dejan] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5697 - authorization map and
composite destinations
[tabish121] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5698
[tabish121]
48 matches
Mail list logo
