[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cadmean updated AMQ-5732:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 5.10.0)
Changing message selector leads to blocking message
it needs a target of mvn install -Dtest=0 b/c the schema is not generated
in the compile phase.
On 15 Apr 2015 23:44, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea why this PR failed?
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/90
I built it here and it all passed.
is it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Richards updated AMQ-5685:
Attachment: purge-fix.patch
I've written a patch - including tests which addresses the problem.
Hi Justin,
good idea. We discussed about that yesterday with Hiram and Clebert.
+1
Regards
JB
On 04/15/2015 09:10 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
Based on some feed-back from ApacheCon I just created a new job on Jenkins
which will do a simple compilation (i.e. 'mvn compile') for pull requests
If Hawt.io has become/became a single page app (as opposed to the current
forward-backward navigation) then
it would be worth considering its inclusion; otherwise no. Might as well
build some Angular based replacement
console SPA from scratch in that case.
Just my two cents.
Thanks,
Paul
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-5721.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dejan Bosanac
Pull request merged. Thanks
I triggered a new build
Yeah... I wouldn't open that can of worms... ;-)
That said, perhaps at some point in the future hawt.io could be a donation
to Apache that would likely garner A LOT of support and community
involvement. Imagine the possibilities if that happened! ;-) /me ducks
--
View this message in context:
Just to be clear. Before things diverge again. No one is actually considering
hawt.io. I took that message as just kidding.
Angular.js seems the best choice from what I have seen.
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
On Apr 16, 2015, at 08:41, Paul Gale paul.n.g...@gmail.com wrote:
actually i were not kidding - but also didn't notice that its not an option
...
sorry for confusion.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Clebert clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to be clear. Before things diverge again. No one is actually
considering hawt.io. I took that message as just
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:35, Petter Nordlander petter.nordlan...@enfo.se
wrote:
Hi,
I truly love the way the Apollo user interface is made. It¹s awesome and
simple.
That + some features of ActiveMQ Web Console / Hawt.io that includes
sending and retrying messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
arnaud hoareau updated AMQ-5730:
Component/s: Broker
When nonBlockingRedelivery is set to true, redelivery delays can be incorrect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5685.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Timothy Bish
Great patch, applied with thanks!
Purge does not work
ActiveMQ 5.7.0
OS : Oracle Solaris 10
JDK 1.7.0
J2EE
ActiveMQ process was killed.
When Tried to start ActiveMQ using following
. activemq start
Queues started to Work. However, http://localhost:8161/admin/; started to
give
Error!
Exception occurred while processing this request, check the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish updated AMQ-5685:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.12.0
Purge does not work when simple authorisation plugin is used
Hi,
I truly love the way the Apollo user interface is made. It¹s awesome and
simple.
That + some features of ActiveMQ Web Console / Hawt.io that includes
sending and retrying messages would make a great user interface for a
Reactive/Artemis.
I would probably be able to help a bit testing and bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14498393#comment-14498393
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5713:
-
GitHub user mfrazier63 reopened a pull request:
GitHub user mfrazier63 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/90
AMQ-5713 - adding getDoHandlReplyTo to satisfy spring config load errors
For:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14498392#comment-14498392
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5713:
-
Github user mfrazier63 closed the pull request
Github user mfrazier63 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14498412#comment-14498412
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5713:
-
Github user mfrazier63 closed the pull request
I accept your vote. Just one point I wanted to add
It's activemq reactive. No MQ on that case.
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
On Apr 16, 2015, at 14:20, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote:
I was staying quiet because I didn't feel too strongly about the name, due in
part to
OK, I'll update the Apache ActiveMQ website to refer to the new
#apache-activemq channel on freenode and indicate the old channel is
deprecated.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-PROPOSAL-Move-IRC-channel-to-freenode-tp4694923p4695094.html
Sent from the
+ 1 [a] ActiveMQ Artemis
I like Artemis better, though I don't really like the two A-starting
words...
2015-04-14 17:42 GMT+02:00 Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com:
Now that we have chosen to give the HornetQ code donation a code name,
it's time to pick what that code name will be. Please
Ah - Bruce beat me to the update. I added notes to move away from codehaus
and avoid #activemq on FREENODE.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-PROPOSAL-Move-IRC-channel-to-freenode-tp4694923p4695097.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive
I was staying quiet because I didn't feel too strongly about the name, due in
part to past use of the name Artemis (outside Apache), but thinking about
how the name ActiveMQ ReactiveMQ would likely get shortened by most folks
to just ReactiveMQ to eliminate the redundancy, changed my mind...
+1
btw. If u want a rebuild on the pr. The easiest way it to amend the commit even
without any changes and push -f to your local fork. Jenkins would catch it
automagically
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
On Apr 16, 2015, at 13:36, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote:
Nice touch.
Ah, thanks for setting me straight. I am going to stick with Artemis anyway
as that was the direction I was leaning originally.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Pick-a-code-name-for-the-HornetQ-code-donation-tp4694889p4695103.html
Sent from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14499172#comment-14499172
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-99:
-
Github user HornetQBot commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5252.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.12.0
Fix by patch in AMQ-5685
Purge through webconsole
Github user HornetQBot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/207#issuecomment-93879335
Can one of the admins verify this patch by saying ok to test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user chirino opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/207
Setting posix permissions is not supported on windows.
Use a boot jar to setup the classpath.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14499167#comment-14499167
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-99:
-
Github user chirino commented on the
Hiram Chirino created ACTIVEMQ6-99:
--
Summary: Support installing as a windows service
Key: ACTIVEMQ6-99
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-99
Project: Apache ActiveMQ 6
Github user chirino commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/208#issuecomment-93883315
Still need to document ... and the the jsw dep info to the license files..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14499166#comment-14499166
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-99:
-
GitHub user chirino opened a pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/207
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mfrazier63 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
I have resubmitted my PR and it built fine with the new Jenkins config.
However, the build was still marked as bad. I can’t see the config settings on
that job,
can somebody (Justin?) address this problem?
Is there something I should be doing differently?
Thanks.
The Jenkins job was attempting to publish JUnit reports at the end of the build
and that was failing the build (since there were no reports available). I
removed that post-build step. Let's see how it goes now.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: Mark Frazier mmfraz...@me.com
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14498468#comment-14498468
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5713:
-
GitHub user mfrazier63 reopened a pull request:
GitHub user mfrazier63 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/90
AMQ-5713 - adding getDoHandlReplyTo to satisfy spring config load errors
For:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5713
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
That worked.
Thanks!
On Apr 16, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Justin Bertram jbert...@apache.com wrote:
The Jenkins job was attempting to publish JUnit reports at the end of the
build and that was failing the build (since there were no reports available).
I removed that post-build step. Let's see
Nice touch. Looks like it needed a little tweaking, but looks good now.
I agree on the unit testing as well. We want to have some base unit tests
to run, but I don't believe we are prepared at this time to do so.
--
View this message in context:
43 matches
Mail list logo
