Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Mohamed Badri
It works, after building packages from 1.x branch ( 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT ) I was able to recover the 50K missing messages. Thanks a lot for that. On the same instance I had an NPE without stack trace. Can someone explain me what happens, or what can be the cause of the following messages logs :

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1093: ARTEMIS-994 Support Netty Native Epoll ...

2017-03-13 Thread michaelandrepearce
GitHub user michaelandrepearce opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1093 ARTEMIS-994 Support Netty Native Epoll on Linux The following changes are made to support Epoll. * Refactored SharedNioEventLoopGroup into renamed SharedEventLoopGroup

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Let's make the links 2.x and 1.x. Immutable links makes it easier on google? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 03/13/2017 04:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Right now we have 10. And going up. > > > > 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 04:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: Right now we have 10. And going up. 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 I think John is saying the same thing I said earlier, only keep 1.5.4 and 2.0.0 as those are the latest supported releases, when 1.5.5 ships then drop 1.5.4 ...

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Right now we have 10. And going up. 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 03/13/2017 04:07 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. > > > > > > > > Just that it seems too much now. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 04:07 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. Just that it seems too much now. Isn't that just two instances? That doesn't seem like to much. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM Jiri Danek wrote: On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ KahaDB Export Tool 0.1.0

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
I played around with it a bit, nice work! It was faster than I thought it'd be to export a largish store which is nice. I think an initial release is not a bad idea, gets you something out that people can kick the tires on for sure. Once the 2.0.0 release is done I'd go for it. On

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. Just that it seems too much now. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM Jiri Danek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I was wondering if we could / should update the docs

[GitHub] activemq pull request #229: Introduce method to add a single trusted package

2017-03-13 Thread gstraube
GitHub user gstraube opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/229 Introduce method to add a single trusted package You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gstraube/activemq master Alternatively you

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 01:27 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: this made sense at first (at least I think it did), but now that We will have 10 versions (and counting) of Artemis... this seems a bit too much... http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs.html I was wondering if we could / should update the docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Rework NMS.AMQP

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
I created a branch for the previous work and named it deprecated-impl (for want of a better name) and pushed it upstream. Should be clear now to start on any new development of this client as folks see fit. On 02/14/2017 02:32 PM, Duane Pauls wrote: Hello, I'm relatively new to the ActiveMQ

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread nigro_franz
+1 Just reducing all the 1.x.y docs to the latest 1.x + the latest 2.0 would be great and will help the users leaving only common uses choices simpler. And as Clebert pointed, it will help web robots too... -- View this message in context:

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1092: NO-JIRA fix race in TopicControlCluster...

2017-03-13 Thread jbertram
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1092 NO-JIRA fix race in TopicControlClusterTest Test didn't account for "remote" queue bindings from other cluster member which caused a race condition. You can merge this pull request

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Jiri Danek
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I was wondering if we could / should update the docs page to only > include the latest version (that is 2.0.0)... The docs are still > maintained at the git, so you can always refer to the doc of the > version

[DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
this made sense at first (at least I think it did), but now that We will have 10 versions (and counting) of Artemis... this seems a bit too much... http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs.html I was wondering if we could / should update the docs page to only include the latest version (that is

Re: [DISCUSS] Rework NMS.AMQP

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
Just to close the loop here, the AMQP NMS client repo is now migrated to Git and mirrored on Github here: https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp We should probably create a branch of the old client work before pushing any rework PRs in, I'll take care of that a bit later today. On

Re: [UPDATE] Move of NMS project SVN repositories to Git

2017-03-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Great. Thanks for all the work you've put in to making this happen, I know it was much more involved than expected or it would have been in the past, since it turns out that infra recently stopped doing these migrations on our behalf locally and you instead had to migrate them yourself remotely.

[UPDATE] Move of NMS project SVN repositories to Git

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
I've completed work on moving the SVN repositories for the NMS API and clients over to Git repositories and tested that the svngit2jira linkages have been setup properly. The old SVN repos are left intact but have been made read only. The new Git Repositories are as follows NMS API ->

Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Justin Bertram
Should be merged now on master and 1.x branches. Justin - Original Message - From: "Clebert Suconic" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 10:25:40 AM Subject: Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation:

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1090: ARTEMIS-1034 - non-durable subscription...

2017-03-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1090 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
It hasn't been merged yet... give me some time. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Mohamed Badri wrote: > Thanks a lot, > I'll apply this patch on the 1.5.4 release. > > > > On 13 March 2017 at 13:09, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > >> You will have to

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1089: ARTEMIS-1033 Fixing NPE on PageTX and r...

2017-03-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1089 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1088: Two minor fixes

2017-03-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1088 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1091: NO-JIRA STOMP doc updates

2017-03-13 Thread jbertram
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1091 NO-JIRA STOMP doc updates You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis stompDoc Alternatively you can

Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Mohamed Badri
Thanks a lot, I'll apply this patch on the 1.5.4 release. On 13 March 2017 at 13:09, Clebert Suconic wrote: > You will have to patch the server to be able to restart that server: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1089 > > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1090: ARTEMIS-1034 - non-durable subscription...

2017-03-13 Thread andytaylor
GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1090 ARTEMIS-1034 - non-durable subscription queue not ended on link close https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1034 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by

[DISCUSS] ActiveMQ KahaDB Export Tool 0.1.0

2017-03-13 Thread Christopher Shannon
Hi Everyone, With the release of Apache Artemis 2.0.0 coming this week I wanted to get some feedback on the KahaDB Export tool before tagging version 0.1.0. I'm calling it version 0.1.0 for now as I would still consider it beta quality and don't want to promote it to a version 1.0.0 until it has

Re: [RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 (RC1))

2017-03-13 Thread Martyn Taylor
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:55 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:37 AM Timothy Bish wrote: > > > On 03/13/2017 06:02 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > > > John, > > > > > > The release artifacts have been uploaded dist.apache.org. It'll >

Re: [RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 (RC1))

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:37 AM Timothy Bish wrote: > >> On 03/13/2017 06:02 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: >> > John, >> > >> > The release artifacts have been uploaded dist.apache.org. It'll >>

Re: Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
You will have to patch the server to be able to restart that server: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1089 On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Mohamed Badri wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Artemis 1.5.2 > and after a problem due to load on the artemis server > I

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1089: ARTEMIS-1033 Fixing NPE on PageTX and r...

2017-03-13 Thread clebertsuconic
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1089 ARTEMIS-1033 Fixing NPE on PageTX and reload You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis

Re: [RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 (RC1))

2017-03-13 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:37 AM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 03/13/2017 06:02 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > > John, > > > > The release artifacts have been uploaded dist.apache.org. It'll > probably > > take a couple of days for the mirrors to catch up. > > 24 hours is usually

Re: [RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 (RC1))

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 06:02 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: John, The release artifacts have been uploaded dist.apache.org. It'll probably take a couple of days for the mirrors to catch up. 24 hours is usually more than enough time. Thanks On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Clebert Suconic

Artemis 1.5.2 - AMQ224000: Failure in initialisation: java.lang.NullPointerException

2017-03-13 Thread Mohamed Badri
Hi, I'm using Artemis 1.5.2 and after a problem due to load on the artemis server I had to restart one instance. Then, when the instance with the following errors : === 07:35:12,021 WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.journal] AMQ142015:

Re: [RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 (RC1))

2017-03-13 Thread Martyn Taylor
John, The release artifacts have been uploaded dist.apache.org. It'll probably take a couple of days for the mirrors to catch up. Thanks On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > Nice one. > > > Please do not send the Announce until the mirrors