Hi everyone,
Tim's post about not having a platform to run Visual Studio 2017 recently
sparked a discussion between Duane, Ragnar and I about adding project and
solution files for older versions of visual studio to the NMS AMQP Provider
and were looking for guidance.
Currently, the project only
The presence of those queues suggests an application is using those
destination names. Deleting those queues won't stop applications from
recreating them.
So first thing is to track down where those queues are being created.
There may be a way to prevent the creation of these odd queue names
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1869
can you tidy up the commit message...
I'm a bit flexible with long names.. some people are strict with 80
characters on the first line... but your line is way too
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1870
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1871
---
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1871
Test fixes...
Please, merge this with high priority.
I have been able to merge anything else due to these test fixes.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1844
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1845
---
I could see duplicate dlq's created on my activemq server. How do I configure
to delete this?
DLQ.DLQ.inqueue
DLQ.DLQ.DLQ.inqueue
its creating lot of such queues
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1835
---
Hello Everyone
This is an initial reminder to let you all know that we are holding an
Apache EU Roadshow co-located with FOSS Backstage in Berlin on 13^th and
14^th June 2018. https://s.apache.org/tCHx
The Call for Proposals (CFP) for the Apache EU Roadshow is currently
open and will close
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
for this kind of big PR to be merged, we need the full testsuite to be
passing.
Not talking about the PR testsuite.
There's an issue that we don't have an env at
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
Really need PR build to be green. Maybe re-push with a comment update to
get try trigger another build.
Seems some methods have been still left in-implemented. Also
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166944
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166771
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166219
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166679
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166465
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166093
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166559
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166047
--- Diff:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793#discussion_r168166856
--- Diff:
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
@RaiSaurabh @michaelandrepearce
I've run a couple of benchmarks and the results are strange, perf wire the
improvements are on par or (slightly) less than
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
@RaiSaurabh I'm doing some preliminary benchmarks to see if the number of
buffer copies are decreased :+1:
---
GitHub user stanlyDoge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1870
ARTEMIS-1681 fix hawtio console security issue
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/stanlyDoge/activemq-artemis E1016
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
@franz1981 I have implemented the changes @michaelandrepearce requested.
@michaelandrepearce could you please review it.
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
@RaiSaurabh Please check the @michaelandrepearce comments about this PR
first :+1:
---
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1793
@michaelandrepearce Looks like another issue with GIT repo. Could you
please check.
---
28 matches
Mail list logo
