Re: Building on Java 11

2020-06-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
what's nice about this, is that even compatibility tests are running... (think about that the compatibility tests is mixing a mesh that includes even old hornetq clients against artemis master, and these were built with older JDK). I was afraid old versions of netty woudln't be compatible on the

Re: Building on Java 11

2020-06-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
I am able to build with adoptopenjdk 11, but not with 13. a lot of errors on javadoc. We would need to fix those to be able to be flexible enough? or is there any magic settings perhaps to relax this? On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:16 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Going back to the error-prone dep

Re: ARTEMIS-2751: authentication of AMQP messages

2020-06-03 Thread Justin Bertram
> For Core messages, it appears there is a way to check the provenance of a message. That's correct. > For AMQP messages, it appears there is no way to currently do this. That's also correct. > ...the question is how the product in question can get similar provenance/security information for

Re: ARTEMIS-2751: authentication of AMQP messages

2020-06-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
that's probably something you can do with a Plugin or Interceptor. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:02 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:47 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > > > I would like to better understand how this is supposed to work... > > > > What specifically do you not

Re: ARTEMIS-2751: authentication of AMQP messages

2020-06-03 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:47 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > I would like to better understand how this is supposed to work... > > What specifically do you not understand? > For Core messages, it appears there is a way to check the provenance of a message. For AMQP messages, it appears there is no

Re: ARTEMIS-2751: authentication of AMQP messages

2020-06-03 Thread Justin Bertram
> I would like to better understand how this is supposed to work... What specifically do you not understand? > ...and see if there are any improvements that could be made here. I imagine improvements could be made, but that question is pretty vague. Are you referring specifically to your

ARTEMIS-2751: authentication of AMQP messages

2020-06-03 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
Hi there, I posted in ARTEMIS-2751 about how one might check the provenance of incoming AMQP messages, but so far haven't seen any response. I would like to better understand how this is supposed to work and see if there are any improvements that could be made here. Kind regards, Dirkjan

Re: Why I need Cannot Post Here using nabble

2020-06-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
I just post straight to the list. I don’t think you should be using babble. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:13 AM Domenico Francesco Bruscino < bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > when I try to create a new topic using nabble > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >

Why I need Cannot Post Here using nabble

2020-06-03 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Hi, when I try to create a new topic using nabble http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html I get the following error: You Cannot Post Here Sorry, but you can't create new topics here. Note that you may

Re: I18N issue with current Artemis

2020-06-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi Emmanuel, Even if I’m French my locale is always en_US ;) So I didn’t notice such build failure, let me check. Regards JB > Le 3 juin 2020 à 11:43, Emmanuel Hugonnet a écrit : > > Hello, > > Sorry I'm French so my locale is FR_fr which makes the current build fails. > > Failed tests: >

Re: Building on Java 11

2020-06-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Going back to the error-prone dep being added to all the modules, if those need to stay I think it would be good for the scope+optional elements be added as well? I see its being governed in the dependencyManagement addition, but the various modules appear to have those elements for their existing

Re: Building on Java 11

2020-06-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Can I ask again about the seemingly broken errorprone-javac config on the branch, which looks to be using a non-existent javac.version property config: "-J-Xbootclasspath/p:${settings.localRepository}/com/google/errorprone/javac/${javac.version}/javac-${javac.version}.jar Looking at

I18N issue with current Artemis

2020-06-03 Thread Emmanuel Hugonnet
Hello, Sorry I'm French so my locale is FR_fr which makes the current build fails. Failed tests:   HumanReadableByteCountTest.test:31 expected:<999[.]0B> but was:<999[,]0B> As you can see this is a really simple failure, that can be easily fixed but I'm wondering about some side effects