+1 (binding)
Casting my own vote ;)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf
Hi all,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf 4.4.x
- Fix Jolokia startup on Windows platform
- Upgrade to Spring 5.3.23
- Upgrade to Jackson 2.14.0
- and much more!
Please take a look on
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:54 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.1 release
>
>
> This is a bug fix release,
>
> I would like to highlight these 3 bug fixes:
>
> - AMQP Large Message over Bridges were broken
> - Rollback
Hi guys
We just have one pending Jira for 5.17.3 release.
I gonna fix that today (windows platform specific issue).
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote tonight my time.
Regards
JB
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 9 nov. 2022 à 03:33, Justin Bertram a écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.0 release.
>
> New and noteworthy items in 2.27.0:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2022-42889 (Apache Commons Text vulnerability)
> - Logging implementation moved to
And back to your question, jackson (including jackson-databind) is
used only in webconsole (and partition but that's rare ;)).
So basically, if you don't use/expose ActiveMQ WebConsole, you don't
have any risk. Furthermore, jackson databind is used in webconsole to
marshall/unmarshall console
Hi,
It's already on track, with Jira and PR:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9130
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/925
I plan to submit 5.17.3 release to vote next week.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM Peter Raymond
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the latest version of
Hi Jon
Thanks for the update and the PR !
I gonna take a look.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:23 PM Jonathan Gallimore
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran into an issue with building ActiveMQ on Windows with the CXF XJC
> plugin:
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
have been. In
> >> lieu
> >> > of the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the
> >> website
> >> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> >> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we shoul
> of the wiki, we said we would use a combination of Github and the website
> > to assemble the report. Has there been any progress on a method for
> > assembling and displaying the reports? Perhaps we should just create a file
> > in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
> >
ile
> in GitHub and have folks contribute there?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Yes, I saw the notification.
> >
> > I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from the las
Hi Bruce,
Yes, I saw the notification.
I think we can bootstrap the report on wiki, starting from the last
one. Then, we can contribute on it, with deadline on Tuesday evening.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 6:19 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> It seems we have a board report due this
Hi Endre,
I will take a look later today or during the weekend.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 9:42 PM Endre Stølsvik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Would it be possible to get a review of AMQ-8617?
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8617
> PR: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/843
Hi Clebert,
I'm +1 about this for the two reasons:
1. I don't think lot of people read the Javadoc on website (personally
I'm reading directly in the IDE)
2. We can still have the javadoc jar published on Maven (not need to
update website)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Clebert
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:23 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release.
>
>
> We removed ActiveMQ Artemis Rest, (which was already non functional)
> as part of this release.
> And other improvements and bug fixes.
>
he ActiveMQ 5.17.2
> announcement. Many did also have release notes or release page style
> link in addition, but they all linked to a general download area.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 07:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Noted, but we need bo
at 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
> >
> > https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
> >
> > This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
> >
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release:
https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5017002-release
This release includes updates, fixes and improvements, especially:
- update to Spring 5.3.22
- update to Shiro 1.9.1
- update to log4j 2.18.0
- and much more!
Enjoy!
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 18:28, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.25.0 release.
>
> This JIRA improved flow control from paging preventing Out Of Memory
> issues when there's a bad consumer without flow control (ARTEMIS-3943
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
since
> >> it does still run on 17.
> >>
> >> I checked things out as follows:
> >> - Verified the signature and checksum files.
> >> - Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files present in the archives.
> >> - Checked headers in the source archive with:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
> - Spring 5.3.22 update
> - Jackson 2.13.13 updat
If there is anything I can do to help getting that in, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Kind regards,
> Endre
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
> >
> &
://github.com/melloware/jasypt
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:10 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of AeroViron
Hi,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote.
This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially:
- Spring 5.3.22 update
- Jackson 2.13.13 update
- Shiro 1.9.1 update
- Log4j 2.18.0 update
- and much more
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
Hi,
We have a consensus. So I will process creating a Jira and preparing a PR.
Thanks all for your feedback.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> Howe
Hi,
We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
(in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
For ActiveMQ 5.18.x, I propose to completely remove any reference to Camel.
No objection ?
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
>
> There are two features added as part of this release:
>
> - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we
> don't have any
;> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would fix it on 5.17.x as well unless theres some reaso
JMS 2.0 applications).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would fix it on 5
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:49 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an ActiveMQ Artemis Native 2.0.0 release
>
>
> For those who are not familiar, this is the Native Layer in Artemis
> responsible for the integration on Linux and Libaio.
>
>
> I have been
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:47 AM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it
> and vote accordingly. Huge kudos to Bruce Dodson for his help with
> resolving issues signaled in rc1.
>
> This release contains the
> wrote:
> >
> >> I would fix it on 5.17.x as well unless theres some reason not to that
> >> im missing, it really seems no different than it is for 5.16.x. People
> >> can upgrade to 5.17.x from <=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
> >> expect
=5.16.2 as well, and reasonably wouldnt
> expect to hit a breakage for this any more than they should on 5.16.x,
> since it also does not implement JMS 2 either.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 15:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Agree: I should not have changed on 5.16.x, keep it f
for
> using 2 if already supplied, falling back to using its provided 1.1 if
> they dont?
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 14:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-osgi bund
change so users can know about the issue before
> they upgrade.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > OK, now I understand the confusion:
> >
> > Karaf activemq-client feature uses activemq-osgi bundle, not
> >
ue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I tested at runtime on activemq-osgi bundle used by activemq-client.
>
> The feature verify would not work with this range.
>
> Let me take a look but I doubt it's the case.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 a
as directly from the
> Import-Package manifest entry of the 5.16.3 and 5.16.5 activemq-client
> jars on maven central. On checking 5.17.1 it lists the same.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > activemq-client 5.16.3 does use the right ran
6.2 before?
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 09:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
> >
> > javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
> >
> > So:
> > 1. if your application uses the same range, it
By the way, you can see in activemq-client:
javax.jms;version="[1.1,3)",
So:
1. if your application uses the same range, it works
2. if your application use [1.1,2), than, simple add javax.jms
(geronimo) 1.1 bundle
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:45 PM Arthur Naseef wrote:
>
> I
Hi Art,
I disagree: as said on Slack, it works fine with JMS 1.1 with you
provide the right bundle (thanks to dependency flag). So, it's
possible to still use JMS 1.1 bundle (geronimo) if you provide before
installing the activemq-client feature.
If you don't provide jms 1.1 bundle, by default,
2022 19:05:37 MESZ schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
> :
> >Hi Benjamin
> >
> >are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
> >java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
> >
> >Can you elaborate your issue ?
> >
&g
Hi Benjamin
are you sure it's really an issue ? If the framework exports the
java.* packages, artemis bundle should work fine.
Can you elaborate your issue ?
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:43 PM Benjamin Graf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OSGi bundles are not playing well because of update to
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:58 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1 release
>
> This is a small release following up where I added a fix for the following
> bug:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3856 -
Hi guys,
I've started to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release.
This release will include several dependency updates, and fixes
detected on 5.17.0/5.17.1.
I will keep you posted soon with more details, but roughly, I plan to
submit the release to vote by the end of next week.
Regards
JB
Hi
Thanks for the update. I will take a new look (I worked a bit with Etienne
about that).
Regards
JB
Le sam. 11 juin 2022 à 02:15, Nikita Shupletsov
a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> My name is Nikita Shupletsov. I am a software development engineer at
> Amazon MQ.
>
> I have been working on an
Hi
Agree to close this vote and prepare a New one soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 10 juin 2022 à 23:14, Clebert Suconic a
écrit :
> Before I close the result, I would like to highlight ARTEMIS-3856
> which is a regression I caused.
>
>
> When I fixed the ThreadLocal non static usages, I reverted
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:05 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release.
>
> As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of
> Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs.
>
>
>
> The release notes can be found
Hi Sergio,
Yes, I think you are right. I will fix that.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 2:06 AM Mendez, Sergio
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While browsing through the documentation, I went to the following URL:
>
> https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-getting-started
>
> If I scroll down
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:35 PM Havret wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it
> and vote accordingly.
>
> This release contains a single bugfix[1] by Iuliia Fatkullina! Thank you!
>
> Besides that I cherry-picked notice
ssive.
>
> --
> Étienne
> he/him/his
>
> On Sat, 7 May 2022, at 10:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
> > It's more to get consensus.
> >
> > I think we have a consensus.
> >
> >
The purpose is not really a formal vote (as for a release for instance).
It's more to get consensus.
I think we have a consensus.
+1 to proceed now :)
Regards
JB
Le dim. 8 mai 2022 à 05:14, Tetreault, Lucas
a écrit :
> Here is the summary of all the votes:
> [+1,1,-1,-1000,-1,-1]
Hi
Thanks for the details. Indeed it's related to the quotes in the name (in
order to able to display destinations with spaces etc in the console).
Lucas created a PR, I will review and merge. Then I will move forward on a
release soon.
Regards
JB
Le ven. 6 mai 2022 à 19:25, Chandan Singh
a
Hi
Unfortunately, the image is not displayed on the mailing list.
Can you please send the test case and image to me (jbono...@apache.org) ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:22 PM Chandan Singh
wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
>
>
> I recently did an Active MQ upgrade for Spring4Shell
-1 for leader/follower, it doesn't apply for current master/slave
mechanism, it's not the same semantic as in Kafka for instance
-1 for primary/backup, technically, this one could work, but it sounds
"confusing" to me
+1 for active/passive is probably the most accurate and describe the
behavior
uncements.
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 05:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, it's OK for me too, dlcdn is up to date.
> >
> > I'm moving forward on website and announcement.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
&g
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series, including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory leak on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ with pending STOMP
the announcement.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on confi
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
>
> This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
> - fix on configuration when wrapper is use
The Apache ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series, including:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19
- upgrade to XBean 4.21
- upgrade to Jackson 2.13.2/2.13.2.2
- upgrade to Jolokia 1.7.1
- upgrade to ASM 9.3 for
the files (the bin tar.gz) is still
> > > 404'ing for me on some occasions on 1 network and always on another.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 13:16, Robbie Gemmell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have asked on infras slack channel a
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.16.5 release to your vote.
This release is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series including:
- fix on configuration when wrapper is used
- fix memory lead on temp store
- avoid potential NPE when starting ActiveMQ
- add missing Jetty continuation artifact and
, website, reporter, etc). I will
do the announcement once all is done.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important release on
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
>
> This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
> major changes:
> - upgrade to Spring 5.3
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0 release.
>
>
> There are no new features on this release, however there are many
> improvements and bug fixes.
>
> In particular there's a default change
Hi guys,
I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release to your vote.
This release is an important release on the 5.17.x series, bringing
major changes:
- upgrade to Spring 5.3.19, fixing Spring4shell vulnerability (even if
ActiveMQ is not directly impacted)
- XBean 4.21 (supporting Spring 5.x) and ASM
Hi guys
We are finally almost ready for 5.17.1 release. Only two Jira with PRs are
under review.
I will work on these ones today.
I plan to submit 5.17.1 to vote tomorrow.
Thanks
Regards
JB
Le lun. 11 avr. 2022 à 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> Quick upd
Done:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/830
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
>
I agree. Let me create a PR to remove it ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> Why wait? Seems really quite odd to have a current release stream with
> one of its noted features having been an upgrade to Spring 5, and a
> coming 5.17.1 release
Hi guys,
Quick update about ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release.
We have the last update PRs to merge and a couple of fixes to do. I'm
working on it this week. I will submit 5.17.1 to vote by the end of
the week.
Regards
JB
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce;
&g
t; > > ref: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28260 <
> > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28260>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Pavlovich
> > >
> > >> On Mar 31, 2022, at 9:10 AM, Jean
att Pavlovich
>
> > On Mar 31, 2022, at 7:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I would like to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release this week, probably to
> > submit it to vote during the weekend or next week.
> >
> > One of the m
+1 to remove it in 5.18.x for me.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:56 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hi all-
>
> Is anyone aware of a use case or compelling reason to maintain the
> activemq-itests-spring31?
>
> If not, I’ll plan to remove in 5.18.x.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
Hi guys,
I would like to prepare ActiveMQ 5.17.1 release this week, probably to
submit it to vote during the weekend or next week.
One of the main reasons is to update to Spring 5.3.18 which includes
CVE fixes
(https://spring.io/blog/2022/03/31/spring-framework-rce-early-announcement).
I also
Hi Bruce,
I added the ActiveMQ "Classic" section.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:05 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Once again, it's time to contribute to the report for the ASF Board. Please
> take just a few minutes to offer up any activity you feel is worthy of
> inclusion by adding it to
er benefit to using the script is that when
> using the CDN link directly it means the links break when the release
> shuffles off the CDN when a new one arrives, whereas using the script
> the link now keeps working as the script directs to the archive
> instead.
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar
FYI, I just asked the question straight (between dlcdn or closer.cgi
preferred use) on #asfinfra. I will update the projects website
accordingly.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Why other Apache projects are using dlcdn di
ts.apache.org/list?us...@infra.apache.org:lte=6M:DLCDN
> Humbedooh 11:14 PM
> it is, yes
> Hans Van Akelyen 11:14 PM
> ack
> Humbedooh 11:15 PM
> I think JB's question was about the templating of it all
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
&
the announcement threads then
> where they said the opposite more than once.
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 06:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I talked with asfinfra last need to double check:
> >
> > 1. They confirm that dlcdn is the URL
gt; >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new fc6da54 Use "new" dlcdn download URLs
> > fc6da54 is described below
> >
> > commit fc6da54d8ff0f5972364a249803aa521a5ff4105
> > Author: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
sf/activemq-website.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new fc6da54 Use "new" dlcdn download URLs
> > fc6da54 is described below
> >
> > commit fc6da54d8ff0f5972364a249803aa521a5ff4105
>
+1 (binding)
I did few simple tests on this release:
- build and run artemis
- check hash and signatures
- check LICENSE and NOTICE files
- simple run on Karaf
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:32 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
If we distinguish the simple jira where the title is enough (I'm
thinking about the dependency updates where the title is enough, but
these Jiras are good for the tracking), I generally agree.
+1 to have some guidelines in the contributor guide (in source repo
and/or website) and also in PR
Just to be clear: just remove this from your activemq.xml:
You can see the change here:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/commit/472dcf84979f063a375e5413d794e56117e52a9f
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:58 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You are us
W 614-249-6672
> shan...@nationwide.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 9:48 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release (take
> #2)
>
> Nationwide
ppen to read a stale announcement /
> page / etc its good that they end up getting something newer instead.
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi again ;)
> >
> > As the announcement is specifically for 5.17.0, I think it's more
0/apidocs
> >
> > is already being watched through:
> > /.../activemq-website/src/maven/5.17.0/apidocs
> >
> > MORE INFO: https://github.com/guard/listen/blob/master/README.md
> > LiveReload: Browser connected
> >
> >
> >
lready being watched! **
>
> Directory: /../activemq-website/src/maven/5.17.0/apidocs
>
> is already being watched through:
> /.../activemq-website/src/maven/5.17.0/apidocs
>
> MORE INFO: https://github.com/guard/listen/blob/master/README.md
> LiveR
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce ActiveMQ 5.17.0 has been released.
ActiveMQ 5.17.0 is a major milestone in ActiveMQ roadmap, bringing lot of
changes, fixes and improvements, especially:
- JDK 11+ required for build and run now
- Spring 5.3.16
- Log4j 2.17.1
- Jetty 9.4.45 using atomic
hese tasks will probably need a day or so.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release (take #2) to your vote. Compared to the
> first attempt, we fixed geronimo jar version and shadin
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release (take #2) to your vote. Compared to the
> first attempt, we fixed geronimo jar version and shading of
> activemq-client, activemq-pool, ac
Hi guys,
I submit ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release (take #2) to your vote. Compared to the
first attempt, we fixed geronimo jar version and shading of
activemq-client, activemq-pool, activemq-jms-pool artifacts.
This release is an important milestone in ActiveMQ roadmap, including 200
issues, especially:
Hi guys,
due to AMQ-8533, I cancel this vote to prepare a new take.
The new take will include geronimo jar update and fix for AMQ-8533.
I will submit the release to vote tomorrow morning (my time).
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 6:24 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
o go ahead and merge in
> AMQ-8530
> > > (and some other test fixes)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:18 PM francois.papon <
> > francois.pa...@openobject.fr>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)Tested with some intern
1 (non-binding)Tested with some internal projects.Thanks
> > JB!regardsFrançois
> > Message d'origine De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > j...@nanthrax.net> Date : 07/03/2022 18:25 (GMT+01:00) À :
> > dev@activemq.apache.org Objet : [VOTE] Apache Acti
Hi guys,
*Finally*, after several weeks waiting, I'm pleased to submit Apache
ActiveMQ 5.17.0 release to your vote.
This release is an important milestone in ActiveMQ roadmap, including 200
issues, especially:
- support Spring 5.x
- support log4j 2.x (2.17.1)
- JDK 11+ support for both build and
emq/pull/786
> There were a couple of minor conflicts but nothing major to fix.
>
> I bumped the version on the main branch to 5.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> If CI is good I think we should be ok to proceed with the release.
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 9:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
&g
o set CI run: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/786
> There were a couple of minor conflicts but nothing major to fix.
>
> I bumped the version on the main branch to 5.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> If CI is good I think we should be ok to proceed with the release.
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 202
+1
I merged the Jetty PR in the meantime.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:29 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll open a PR for revert it
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
201 - 300 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
