Any update on this?
Thanks,
sv
-
Stephen Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-AcitveMQ-5-7-1-release-tp4658048p4659843.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think if we can build a list of of svn commits that we want to pull into
the 5.7.1 then can setup /w the needed changes. Any takers?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Steve.V. stephen.vinc...@sas.com wrote:
Any update on this?
Thanks,
sv
-
Stephen Vincent
--
View this message
Hello,
since most of the people here agreed with 5.7.1 release, I'm just wondering,
is there any concrete plan yet to release it? We are using 5.3 and are
planning to upgrade. If there will be a 5.7.1 soon than we would like to
wait. But if not, we will go for 5.7.0. Thanks.
Regards
Amex
--
+0
I'm neutral on this one. No strong feelings either way, unless there was a
show-stopper bug fixed in the core product (not counting the XSS problem in
the demos).
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Gaurav Sharma
gaurav.cs.sha...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
We might also consider rolling any patches
Hi
Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some
bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits
that has since been fixed.
As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move
stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc.
+1 ... we should branch off the tag and back port those improvements.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some
bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits
that
+1
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:01 +0200, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some
bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits
that has since been fixed.
As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core
+1
We might also consider rolling any patches for the lease db locker. When I had
tested the original patch against oracle, it was working okay but folks are now
reporting that the functionality is broken in 5.7
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:01, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Yes I
