Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-16 Thread Clebert Suconic
Like Francesco just committed a doc changed on mapped journal. Mapped Journal is on 2.0.0 but the docs are out dated. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Andy Taylor wrote: > Personally, I would prefer a separate repo for the docs, its fine to have > versions linked to a

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-15 Thread Andy Taylor
Personally, I would prefer a separate repo for the docs, its fine to have versions linked to a release but then they are set in stone. Docs are usually the last thing to get written and sometimes rushed or maybe not even in time for a release. If they were in a separate repo you could still spend

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > I'd prefer to keep the latest versions of docs for each minor release. I'd > squash all the 1.5.x into just 1.5, but keep 1.0, 1.1 etc... The 1.5 docs > may not be applicable to 1.4 due to the introduction of new

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-15 Thread Robbie Gemmell
What we do for Qpid is to have a central documentation/download etc page that links to the latest release artifacts and documentation for each component, but then also have specific pages for each component release that includes the artifacts and docs for each specific release. Those are also

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-15 Thread Martyn Taylor
I'd prefer to keep the latest versions of docs for each minor release. I'd squash all the 1.5.x into just 1.5, but keep 1.0, 1.1 etc... The 1.5 docs may not be applicable to 1.4 due to the introduction of new features. 1.0 for example, is very different from 1.5, but we I feel we should still

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Let's make the links 2.x and 1.x. Immutable links makes it easier on google? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 03/13/2017 04:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Right now we have 10. And going up. > > > > 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 04:44 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: Right now we have 10. And going up. 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 I think John is saying the same thing I said earlier, only keep 1.5.4 and 2.0.0 as those are the latest supported releases, when 1.5.5 ships then drop 1.5.4 ...

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Right now we have 10. And going up. 1.0, 1.1, 1.5.0 1.5.11.5.4. 2.0 On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 03/13/2017 04:07 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. > > > > > > > > Just that it seems too much now. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 04:07 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. Just that it seems too much now. Isn't that just two instances? That doesn't seem like to much. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM Jiri Danek wrote: On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Sure. Latest 1.x and latest 2.x. Just that it seems too much now. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM Jiri Danek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I was wondering if we could / should update the docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Timothy Bish
On 03/13/2017 01:27 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: this made sense at first (at least I think it did), but now that We will have 10 versions (and counting) of Artemis... this seems a bit too much... http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs.html I was wondering if we could / should update the docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread nigro_franz
-version-docs-on-Artemis-tp4723714p4723717.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Jiri Danek
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I was wondering if we could / should update the docs page to only > include the latest version (that is 2.0.0)... The docs are still > maintained at the git, so you can always refer to the doc of the > version

[DISCUSS] Single version docs on Artemis

2017-03-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
this made sense at first (at least I think it did), but now that We will have 10 versions (and counting) of Artemis... this seems a bit too much... http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs.html I was wondering if we could / should update the docs page to only include the latest version (that is