Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Clebert Suconic
Ok, I will remove only vertx for now then. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > The AeroGear Connector Service is a useful component, if it's not working > then let's fix it up. It's a convenient way for users to integrate > traditional messaging systems

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Martyn Taylor
The AeroGear Connector Service is a useful component, if it's not working then let's fix it up. It's a convenient way for users to integrate traditional messaging systems with mobile applications. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Francesco Nigro wrote: > Good idea! > > Il

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Francesco Nigro
Good idea! Il ven 28 ott 2016, 15:37 Robbie Gemmell ha scritto: > On 28 October 2016 at 05:56, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I > > don't really think anyone will be using it: >

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 28 October 2016 at 05:56, Clebert Suconic wrote: > There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I > don't really think anyone will be using it: > > - aerogear: > * It's not working > * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear > *

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1, no reason to keep broken stuff around. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 > > Regards > JB > > ⁣​ > > On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen > wrote: > >+1 > > > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB ⁣​ On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen wrote: >+1 > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic > wrote: >> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I >> don't really think anyone will be

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-28 Thread Claus Ibsen
+1 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I > don't really think anyone will be using it: > > - aerogear: > * It's not working > * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear >

Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-27 Thread Bennet Schulz
no objections. > On 28 Oct 2016, at 06:56, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I > don't really think anyone will be using it: > > - aerogear: >* It's not working >* I am not sure about the status of

[DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module

2016-10-27 Thread Clebert Suconic
There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I don't really think anyone will be using it: - aerogear: * It's not working * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around. i.e. Aerogear consuming artemis -