Thank you to everyone who contributed to this board report. Thank you for
taking the time!
This report has been submitted.
Bruce
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:18 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I tweaked the draft report, inc removing mention of 5.15.10 from the
> prev quarter and adding the NMS AMQP
I tweaked the draft report, inc removing mention of 5.15.10 from the
prev quarter and adding the NMS AMQP and Artemis Native releases to
the releases section.
Robbie
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 21:22, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> FWIW, there is a 5.x release listed from early September. That's what was
FWIW, there is a 5.x release listed from early September. That's what was
confusing me as to the time period of the report.
Justin
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:19 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Yes, that is correct. Thank you, Justin!
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:53 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
Yes, that is correct. Thank you, Justin!
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:53 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> To be clear, this report covers October, November, and December 2019,
> right?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> > I'll add some notes for Artemis.
> >
To be clear, this report covers October, November, and December 2019, right?
Justin
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> I'll add some notes for Artemis.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:47 PM Bruce Snyder
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Krzysztof.
>>
>> Can someone
I'll add some notes for Artemis.
Justin
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:47 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Thank you, Krzysztof.
>
> Can someone please provide some details for the Artemis project? This
> report must be submitted tomorrow.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:34 PM Krzysztof wrote:
>
>
Thank you, Krzysztof.
Can someone please provide some details for the Artemis project? This
report must be submitted tomorrow.
Bruce
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:34 PM Krzysztof wrote:
> I don't have write have write access, so pasting it here:
>
> *ActiveMQ NMS:*
> - The first official release
I don't have write have write access, so pasting it here:
*ActiveMQ NMS:*
- The first official release of Apache ActiveMQ NMS.AMQP Client 1.8.0 (Nov
10)
- Apache.NMS.AMQP NuGet package published.
- Further work involve fixing bugs and making small improvements.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:45 PM
Hi Bruce,
I will prepare sth regarding NMS bits.
Krzysztof
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:23 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Can someone please provide an update on both the Artemis and the NMS
> sections in the board report?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:28 PM Bruce Snyder
> wrote:
>
> > Happy
Can someone please provide an update on both the Artemis and the NMS
sections in the board report?
Bruce
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:28 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone!
>
> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions to the
> latest report to the ASF
Hi All,
I'm happy to see that the report triggered a discussion regarding the JMS
2.0 impl.
Thank you to everyone for the hard work on this major new feature and the
JDK 9+ support!
Bruce
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Yes, so JDK 9+ on 5.16.0 and JMS 2.0 after
Hi JB,
As Robbie mentioned, the board has complained in the past when the ActiveMQ
report included a large amount of copy/paste from the Reporter tool. This
is why I am send emails to this list begging for contributions from the
folks who are currently toiling on the project.
Bruce
On Mon, Jan
Hi Robbie,
Thank you for your contributions! You are correct that the board does not
want a complete copy/paste from the Reporter tool, so I usually just grab a
few relevant stats from it and add them to the report.
Bruce
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:53 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> You mentioned on
Hi JB,
Thank you for your contributions! All the information you provided is very
helpful.
Bruce
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 12:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Happy new year to you as well !
>
> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall activity).
> Please
Yes, so JDK 9+ on 5.16.0 and JMS 2.0 after 5.16.0. Fair enough, I'm
moving forward like this.
Thanks for your feedback guys.
Regards
JB
On 06/01/2020 13:36, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> I agree with Robbie, it's a -1 from me to try and include JMS 2.0 at this
> point in 5.16.0 as it's way too
I agree with Robbie, it's a -1 from me to try and include JMS 2.0 at this
point in 5.16.0 as it's way too late to try and add such a big change. It
needs to be 5.17.0 or higher.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Even if it were almost complete, which it doesnt sound like
Even if it were almost complete, which it doesnt sound like it is,
such a significant change would still seem better positioned for a
5.17.0 at this point than dropped into an almost-ready 5.16.0 at the
last moment.
Either way I would suggest updating the draft report to be clearer as
it doesnt
JB,
The biggest problem is going to be the datastore for JMS 2.0 to support
shared subscriptions. You would need to track shared subscriptions in the
store so that will be a good amount of work to make sure it doesn't break
anything. This will also require a new openwire version for storing as
Hi,
agree, but I started the work about JMS 2.0 first simple support (both
broker and connection factory sides), and it seems to not be so
large/impacting.
That's why I proposed to support it if the effort is not so huge.
Regards
JB
On 06/01/2020 12:30, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> JMS 2.0 is
Hi Robbie,
yeah, 5.16.0 is still my top priority and it's almost ready. JDK 9+ is
OK (including on Karaf). JMS 2.0 is "optional" for 5.16.0 (but I think
it's worth to try to have it). So, it's more an indication in terms of
"best effort", not a strong commitment.
In term of timeline, 5.16.0 could
JMS 2.0 is definitely not going into 5.16.0 but maybe some future release
if someone wanted to do the work. However, I seriously doubt 5.x will
ever support it as it would be a lot of work to update the broker including
the datastores to support it and Artemis already has support.
On Mon, Jan
You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would
happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular
week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving.
Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0
very soon? I ask as the
Hi Bruce,
Happy new year to you as well !
I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall activity).
Please let me know if it's OK for you.
Regards
JB
On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone!
>
> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your
Happy New Year everyone!
Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions to the
latest report to the ASF board:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735
This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
24 matches
Mail list logo
