Re: SVN still in use?

Ok, then it sounds like we are actually using https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ for releases. Thank you for confirming. Bruce On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:39 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > The https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo is already being used for > distributing releases and has been

Re: SVN still in use?

The https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo is already being used for distributing releases and has been for some time. It still appears to be the infra / foundation documented route for publishing releases. However https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ is itself a Subversion repo, is that causing

Re: SVN still in use?

Hi Bruce, When I did ActiveMQ 5.15.x releases, I didn’t use svn but dist.apache.org . What part of the release process use svn ? Regards JB > Le 30 mars 2020 à 22:13, Bruce Snyder a écrit : > > Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get

Re: SVN still in use?

Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get away from using Subversion and migrate to the use of https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ? Bruce On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder wrote: > It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for >

SVN still in use?

It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it possible to move our