GitHub user stanlyDoge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1594
ARTEMIS-1467 example showing the recommended approach for migrating
example showing the recommended approach for migrating messages from
ActiveMQ to Artemis
You can merge this pull
Github user adagys commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293
Rebased ð
---
GitHub user pkralik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1595
ARTEMIS-1466 Upgrade Node.js version to comply with GitBook 3.2.3
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
On 17 October 2017 at 15:37, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.2 release and it's ready for a vote.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
>
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145358049
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -149,16
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Oct 18, 2017, 12:56, at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>On 17 October 2017 at 15:37, Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.2 release and it's ready for a vote.
>>
+1
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 at 21:49 Timothy Bish wrote:
> +1
>
> * Checked each archive to License and Notice files
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Ran the binary broker build on linux, checked web console and sent
> some messages using Qpid JMS example
> * Built
GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1593
ARTEMIS-1463 - added SSL example + docs
also added support for anon login
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1463
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1534
> "Connection readTimeout has occurred.",
NETTY_READ_TIMEOUT = "read-timeout-seconds";
private int readTimeout;
Would a more descriptive name be better here for the
Github user stanlyDoge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1534
@mtaylor Thanks, changed.
---
Bruce,
> On Oct 18, 2017, at 2:04 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> There was a comment regarding Artemis added to the board report that
> mentioned the following:
>
> 'An embedded web management console was added'
>
> What embedded web management console is this? Was it
+1 (non-binding)
Upgraded from 5.15.1 to 5.15.2 in our staging environment; no issues, but
then again 5.15.1 was also working fine for us. Using the auto transport.
Clients tested were an ActiveMQ 5.14.1 Java client and a C# client using
NMS ActiveMQ 1.7.2. The NMS client sometimes takes up to 30
GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1597
ARTEMIS-1468 Fix delete address in console
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-1468
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145407343
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145416018
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@
Github user andytaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1593#discussion_r145416142
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/message-counters/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example/MessageCounterExample.java
---
@@
Github user ppatierno commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145434452
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -67,6
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
ARTEMIS-450 Deadlocked queues over AMQP after too many cancellations
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1597
---
Github user andytaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1593#discussion_r145415855
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/message-counters/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example/MessageCounterExample.java
---
@@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145424777
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1594
you could also use export, import?
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145408498
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ public
GitHub user cshannon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1598
ARTEMIS-1469 - Add support for trusting any client certificate
Added a new trustAll flag which will support trusting any client
keystore when doing testing against a broker. This
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145407743
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -67,6
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145416958
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ public
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@franz1981 I'm using an initialDelay = -1 by default now, and added some
code around on start.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1593#discussion_r145409876
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/message-counters/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example/MessageCounterExample.java
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145411963
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ public
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592
I just pushed the latest iteration with the suggestion from @franz1981
about using a new method as well as removing the system property and enforcing
a hard limit of 256 characters when
There was a comment regarding Artemis added to the board report that
mentioned the following:
'An embedded web management console was added'
What embedded web management console is this? Was it built from the ground
up or was it adopted from something else?
Bruce
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:28
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1595
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145417351
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ public
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145425664
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ public
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@franz1981 lets not waste time.. this is such a small component... you
added a new parameter that was clashing with previous usage.. all I'm doing is
fix it accordingly to the
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@franz1981 It's just that I changed the meaning of getInitialDelay... -1
meaning unset.. and use the previous semantic... the change you did broke some
usage.. so I had to have a
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@clebertsuconic I do not agree with that: the change I did was validated
with tests and the documentation says that when the initial delay isn't
specified is defaulted to period, so the
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@franz1981 nope.. you broke a test Franz.
---
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145437240
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -67,6 +76,8
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145438163
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -67,6
GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1599
ARTEMIS-1470 - fix console move message
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1470
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
using your own words.. the least astonishment way would be to have the
initialDelay nullable (or -1 on this case) I'm fixing what was broken
before.
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596#discussion_r145455314
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQScheduledComponent.java
---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ public
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
your test wasnât validating semantics. The change is good.
---
Github user ppatierno commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1592#discussion_r145441606
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTUtil.java
---
@@ -67,6
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@clebertsuconic It is not following the [principle of least
astonishment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment)
from the API (and doc) perspective: if you
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
@clebertsuconic It is a get of field after a set of the same that is not
getting the configured/expected value: it is not what a user could expect.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1596
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/262
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1598
Even though it's only for testing it would still be good to have a little
documentation on the option.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1593
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1599
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1594
I believe Clebert is referring to [this
tool](https://github.com/apache/activemq-cli-tools) which can be used to export
from 5.x and then the resulting XML file can be imported via the
53 matches
Mail list logo