Re: activeMQ compatibility with jdk and wildfly version

2023-11-09 Thread Bhargav Budida
Thanks for your responses. We are currently using *JDK 1.8 *and we understand the latest supported activeMQ-artemis version is 2.19.1 Actually, we can't upgrade the JDK 1.8 version immediately due to some backward compatibility issues. However, looking at the criticality of the vulnerability

Re: activeMQ compatibility with jdk and wildfly version

2023-11-09 Thread Clebert Suconic
The Artemis in wildfly is not affected by the CVE as openwire is not deployed in openwire. Also 2.31 requires jdk 11 but I think it’s a worth choice as there are many fixes in the broker. On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:40 AM Bhargav Budida wrote: > Hi Team, > > This is regarding a recent

[NuGet Gallery] Message for owners of the package 'Apache.NMS'

2023-11-09 Thread NuGet Gallery
User Sequiterr terry.sean...@gmail.com sends the following message to the owners of Package 'Apache.NMS 2.1.0 (https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS/2.1.0)'. Apache.NMS Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.1.0 is not working with C#, NET7, and ActiveMQ 5.17.3/5.18.3. Refer to this on StackOverflow:

Fwd: activeMQ compatibility with jdk and wildfly version

2023-11-09 Thread Bhargav Budida
Hi Team, This is regarding a recent vulnerability CVE-2023-46604 I am currently using *activeMQ-artemis 2.16.0*, (Jboss) *Wildfly 24.0.0 *and *JDK 1.8*. The latest version of activeMQ-artemis 2.31.2 is not supported by jdk1.8. So I need your assistance with the below queries 1. Will activeMQ

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 6.0.0

2023-11-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, Yesterday, we found a new issue (major) to fix for 6.0.0. I'm on it. Once done, I will submit the release to vote: probably tonight or tomorrow my time. Stay tuned! Regards JB On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 7:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys > > You might have seen I was pretty

Re: activeMQ compatibility with jdk and wildfly version

2023-11-09 Thread Emmanuel Hugonnet
It won't work out of the box: 2.31.2 uses SLF4 J not 2.16.0 There are quite a few changes in roles that I'm sure of. There might be also a few type changes long <-> int mostly and of course there is the new paging mode that you won't be able to configure at all. That's only from the top of my