Running Embedded server fails

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
I try to run an embedded server like described in this example [1] but getting the following error, is there anything missing on my side? Runtime is maven with java 11, no compile errors... java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:

Re: Running Embedded server fails

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
:31, Christoph Läubrich a écrit : I try to run an embedded server like described in this example [1] but getting the following error, is there anything missing on my side? Runtime is maven with java 11, no compile errors... java.lang.NoSuchMethodError

Re: Running Embedded server fails

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
at least artemis-server (as a regular jar type dependency), perhaps others. On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 13:40, Christoph Läubrich wrote: I'm using the following dependency so a plain vanilla artemis: org.apache.activemq

Re: Running Embedded server fails

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
the problem can be reproduced by this simple line in a main class: MessageLoadBalancingType type = MessageLoadBalancingType.OFF; I checked the dependencies but can't find anything unusual, any hint would be appreciated. Am 04.02.21 um 14:40 schrieb Christoph Läubrich: I'm using

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

2021-05-17 Thread Christoph Läubrich
Are there any schedule for the new release? Am 22.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Clebert Suconic: I'm being very meticulous on my testing with AMQP Mirror (it's getting out in a good shape).. and I'm pushing the release back for a week. (the PR is in good shape for a review already:

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
It might be too late, but I'm currently investigate in an issue related to [1] and like to provide a PR the next days that add support of providing sasl mechanism through java-service-loader is there any chance (assuming I got everything done in time) to include this in the next release?

Re: [HEADS-UP] Artemis release next week..

2021-02-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
adding a service loader without changing much at the server dependencies we can merge it... otherwise we can wait another release. (we don't need to wait 2 months for another release... we can make another whenever needed). On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:43 AM Christoph Läubrich wrote: It might be too

JMS Mix "Classic" Clients with "Artemis" Servers

2021-10-13 Thread Christoph Läubrich
We currently plan to switch from Classic>Artemis but there is one point not completely clear (or I have missed something?), is it possible to connect with a "activemq classic" JMSConnectionFactory to an artemis server (given that they both enable the tcp transport of course, same host and port

Re: I need help with Karaf / Artemis features

2021-11-12 Thread Christoph Läubrich
It seems org.apache.activemq.artemis-server-osgi requires the package org.glassfish.json this was probably provided previously by some of the now excluded dependencies. Am 12.11.21 um 22:11 schrieb Clebert Suconic: If you don't want to read the whole message: TL;DR: I need help with this

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis Release some time after next week

2021-07-18 Thread Christoph Läubrich
Just in case I missed it, is the release out already? Am 17.05.21 um 20:23 schrieb Clebert Suconic: I got stuck into an issue at work... and I'm reviewing my schedule now... I will update it later this week... sorry about any inconvenience. On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM Christoph Läubrich

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change OSGi packaging for ActiveMQ 5.19.x

2023-09-12 Thread Christoph Läubrich
this new major AMQ version soon, I have to find a more sustainable approach (to avoid 5+ external releases just for OSGi). Regards JB On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:26 AM Christoph Läubrich wrote: > I disagree on what particular point? > I don't understand why people are against uber bundle.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change OSGi packaging for ActiveMQ 5.19.x

2023-09-11 Thread Christoph Läubrich
Making "uberbundles" is really bad not only for file-size, OSGi was made with sharing in mind and embedding "everything" will make this impossible if you not at the same time rexport the packages what has other implications. Also keep in mind that he activemq could not participate in any

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change OSGi packaging for ActiveMQ 5.19.x

2023-09-11 Thread Christoph Läubrich
go private, not necessary all (I'm on a PoC right now). Regards JB On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:48 AM Christoph Läubrich wrote: Making "uberbundles" is really bad not only for file-size, OSGi was made with sharing in mind and embedding "everything" will make this impossible if

Re: [DISCUSS] Use a generic logger in ActiveMQ Artemis

2022-05-03 Thread Christoph Läubrich
SLF4J support the "Mapped Diagnostic Context" maybe this would be a good replacement here? you could even add more context infos then and people are free to format them as they like: https://logback.qos.ch/manual/mdc.html Am 03.05.22 um 22:30 schrieb Justin Bertram: The point here is that